A Freezone Bible Supporter



Here is a complete Level 0 Academy pack from the 1970s

being posted in 11 parts.  Contents below following the

FZ Bible mission statement.



Much Love,



Tech Lover





**************************************************



FREEZONE BIBLE MISSION STATEMENT



Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology

Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.



The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of

Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the

copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.



They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be

stamped out as heritics.  By their standards, all Christians, 

Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered

to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.



The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings

of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.



We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according

to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.



But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,

the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old 

testament regardless of any Jewish opinion.  



We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion

as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures

without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.



We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do

not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope

that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose

to aid us for that reason.



Thank You,



The FZ Bible Association



**************************************************





******** LEVEL ZERO ACADEMY COURSE PACK ********



Level 0 Academy Course Packs (2) circa 1974 and 1976,

Almost identical [Ed Note: differences noted like this]



Dark blue soft cardboard cover 

8 1/2 by 14 inch 4 hole punched & held together by 

double retainer clips. As issued by Pubs US.



This is complete including book excerpts but does not include

the complete book "Self Analysis" which is also part of the

level (it was posted to the internet last year).



This does not include transcripts of the level 0 tapes, but

we are working on those and will post them eventually.



Note that in the 1970s, HCOBs not written by Ron were converted

to BTBs (Board Technical Bulletins), resulting in the freequent

"reissued as BTB" designation.



Note that bulletins have a "distribution" near the top stating

where they are to be used.  A common distribution is "remimeo"

which means that the orgs may run copies on their mimeo machines.

Another, older, designation is "CenOcon" which means "Central

Orgs Continental".  Others such as "D of T" (director of training)

refer to posts in the Scientology organization.





********



CONTENTS:



part 1



01. BPL   26 JAN 72R  SCIENTOLOGY LEVEL 0 STANDARD ACADEMY CHECKSHEET

02. HCOPL  7 FEB 65 reiss. 15 JUN 70 Keeping Scientology Working

03. HCOPL 17 JUN 70 Technical Degrades

04. HCOB  11 JUN 64 New Student Data

05. HCOB  25 JUN 71R rev. 25 NOV 74 Barriers To Study

06. HCOPL 31 MAY 68 Auditors

07. BPL   17 MAY 71RA r.13 NOV 72 r.10 JUN 74 Study Points and Conditions

08. HCOPL 27 MAY 65 Processing



part 2



09. HCOPL 15 DEC 65 Student's Guide To Acceptable Behavior

10. HCOPL 14 FEB 65 Safeguarding Technology

11. HCOB  27 SEP 66 The Anti-Social Personality

12. HCOPL 22 NOV 67 Rev. 18 JUL 70 Out Tech

13. HCOPL  8 JUN 70 Student Auditing

14. BPL   25 JUN 70RA Expanded Lower Grades

15. HCOB  25 SEP 71RA rev 4 APR 74 Tone Scale In Full

16. BTB   20 JUL 74 Basic Auditing Drills

17. HCOPL 14 OCT 68R rev 1 JAN 76 The Auditor's Code



part 3



18. BTB    6 NOV 72R rev 25 JUL 74 Admin 14R The Worksheets

19. BTB    6 NOV 72R rev 27 AUG 74 Admin 13R The Auditor Report Form

20. BTB    6 NOV 72R rev 28 JUL 74 Admin 12R The Summary Report Form

21. BTB   20 JUN 70 reiss 21 JUL 74 Summary Report

22. BTB    6 NOV 72RA rev 20 NOV 74 Admin 11RA The Exam Report

23. HCOPL  8 MAR 71 Examiner's Form

24. BTB    5 NOV 72R rev 9 SEP 74 Admin 7R The Folder Summary

25. BTB   24 APR 69R rev 8 SEP 74 Preclear Assessment Sheet

26. HCOPL 23 APR 68 Parent or Guardian Assent Forms

27. HCOB  16 AUG 71 Training Drills Modernized



part 4



28. HCOB  24 OCT 71 False TA

29. HCOB  24 OCT 71 False TA Addition 

30. HCOB  15 FEB 72 False TA Addition 2

31. HCOB  18 FEB 72 False TA Addition 3

32. HCOB  29 FEB 72R rev 23 NOV 73 False TA Checklist

33. HCOB  23 NOV 73 Dry and Wet Hands Make False TA

34. HCOB  21 OCT 68 Floating Needle

35. HCOB  11 FEB 66 Free Needles, How To Get Them On a PC

36. HCOB  21 SEP 66 ARC Break Needle

37. HCOB  20 FEB 70 Floating Needles and End Phenomena

38. HCOB   8 OCT 70 C/S Ser 20 Persistent F/N

39. HCOB  21 MAR 74 End Phenomena

40. HCOB  14 MAR 71R r. 25 JUL 73 F/N Everything

41. HCOB  14 OCT 68 Meter Position

42. BTB   14 JAN 63 Rings Causing "Rock Slams"

43. HCOB  18 MAR 74 E-Meter Sensitivity Errors

44. BTB   16 JUN 71R r. 22 JUL 74 Advanced E-Meter Drills

45. HCOB  11 MAY 69 Meter Trim Check

46. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 11 Metering

47. HCOB  10 DEC 65 E-Meter Drill Coaching



part 5



48. HCOB   7 APR 64 Q And A

49. HCOB   3 AUG 65 Auditing Goofs Blowdown Interruption

50. HCOB   5 FEB 66 Letting The PC Itsa

51. HCOB   7 MAY 69 The Five GAEs

52. HCOB  17 MAY 69 TRs and Dirty Needles

53. BTB    4 JUL 69 r. 6 JUL 74 Auditing of OT 3 Preclears

54. BTB   17 JUL 69 r. 28 JUN 74 Flagrant Auditing Errors

55. HCOB  29 JUL 64 Good Indicators At Lower Levels

56. BTB   26 APR 69 r. 7 JUL 64 Bad Indicators

57. HCOPL  4 APR 72 rev. 7 APR 72 Ethics And Study Tech

58. HCOB  14 NOV 65 Clearing Commands

59. BTB    2 MAY 72R r. 10 JUN 74 Clearing Commands

60. BTB   18 NOV 68R r. 9 JUN 74 Model Session

61. HCOB  12 AUG 69 Flying Ruds

62. HCOB  23 AUG 71 (24 May 70 rev) Auditors Rights

63. HCOB   6 NOV 64 Styles of Auditing



part 6



64. HCOB  30 APR 71 Auditing Comm Cycle

65. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 2R The Two Parts Of Auditing

66. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 3 Three Important Comm Lines

67. HCOB  23 MAY 71R aud ser 4R Comm Cycles Within the Auditing Cycle

68. HCOB  23 MAY 71R aud ser 5R The Comm Cycles In Auditing



part 7



69. HCOB  12 JAN 59 Tone of Voice - Acknowledgement

70. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 6 Auditor Failure To Understand

71. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 7 Premature Acknowledgements

72. HCOPL  1 JUL 65 Comm Cycle Additives

73. HCOB  29 SEP 65 Cyclical and Non-Cyclical Processes

74. HCOB  17 MAR 74 TWC, Using Wrong Questions

75. BOOK  Dianetics 55 Chapter 12 The 6 Basic Processes



part 8



76. HCOB  16 FEB 59 Staff Auditor's Conference



part 9



77. HCOB  20 OCT 59 An Experimental Process

78. HCOB  16 FEB 59 HGC Processes for those trained in Engram Running

79. HCOB   8 APR 58 A Pair Of Processes

80. HCOB   9 MAR 60 Expansion of OT-3A Procedure, Step Two

81. HCOB  20 APR 60 Processes

82. HCOB  27 SEP 68 ARC Straight Wire

83. BTB    9 OCT 71RA r. 28 JUN 74 ARC Straightwire Drills

84. BTB   15 NOV 76 ARC Straightwire Quads

85. BOOK  Creation of Human Ability R2-31

86. PAB    8 JUL 55 PAB 56 Axiom 51 and Comm Processing



part 10



87. PAB   18 JUN 55 PAB 54 Reality Level of Preclear

88. HCOB  17 MAR 60 Standardized Sessions

89. HCOB   4 MAY 59 An Affinity Process

90. HCOB   2 MAR 61 New Pre-Hav Command

91. HCOB  25 SEP 59 HAS Co-Audit

92. HCOB  21 JUL 59 HGC Allowed Processes

93. BOOK   Creation of Human Ability R2-60

94. HCOB  13 OCT 59 D.E.I. Expanded Scale

95. HCOB   7 MAY 59 New Process Theory

96. BOOK   Scn 8-8008 6 Levels of Processing Issue 5

97. HCOB  11 DEC 64 Scientology 0 Processes

98. HCOB  26 DEC 64 Routine 0-A Expanded



part 11



99. BTB    9 OCT 71RA r. 29 JUL 74 Level 0 Drills

100. BTB  15 NOV 76 Grade Zero Processes - Quads



********



01. BPL   26 JAN 72R  SCIENTOLOGY LEVEL 0 STANDARD ACADEMY CHECKSHEET





B O A R D P O L I C Y L E T T E R



26 JANUARY 1972R ISSUE IV



REVISED AND REISSUED 11 OCTOBER 1974 AS BPL



CANCELS HCO POLICY LETTER OF 26 JANUARY 1972 ISSUE IV SAME TITLE



SCIENTOLOGY LEVEL 0 STANDARD ACADEMY CHECKSHEET



( HRS ) Hubbard Recognised Scientologist



Remimeo

Scn Orgs 

Academies 

Level 0 

Students 



THIS COURSE CONTAINS KNOWLEDGE VITAL TO SUCCESSFUL LIVING.



PREREQUISITE: (1) Word Clearing Method 1 with all words

taken to FN.



(2) Applied Scholastics Basic Study Manual

( Unless the student has already done a non- 

superliterate Student Hat or PRD & 

M1 with each word fully cleared to FN.)



ORGANIZATION:_____________________________



STUDENT'S NAME:__________________________ POST:___________________



DATE STARTED:____________________ DATE COMPLETED:______________



This checksheet contains the vital survival knowledge of

Scientology Sub-Zero and Zero Level technology.



It covers the technology dealing with "memory" and "communication".



REQUIREMENTS:



Full Study Tech is to be used throughout this course.

Standard classroom Word Clearing methods are required. The

course is done fast flow per HCO PL 31 Aug 74 Issue II Fast

Flow Training Reinstated.



CERTIFICATE:



Completion of this checksheet entitles you to a

"Provisional Hubbard Recognized Scientologist Certificate".

A Provisional Certificate is only valid for one year at

which time it must be validated.



When you have completed through to Class IV training you

should Intern in this Organization under the professional

guidance of our Technical Experts. When you can then apply

the processes of the grade flublessly you will be awarded

your full permanent Hubbard Recognised Scientologist

Certificate.



For Classification a minimum of completing one person on

the Expanded Grade is required. This is best done on a 3

way Co-Audit where student A audit student B who audits

student C who audits student A.



Study the data in checksheet order. Do not go past a word

you do not understand. Use a dictionary and for Scientology

(R) terms, use a Scientology dictionary and refer to the

Symbols and Definitions list (HCOB 23 Aug 65 -

Abbreviations and Symbols of Dianetics (R) and Scientology).



* = 100% knowledge of and understanding and ability to apply.



Not starred = read and listened to the data and understanding of.



A demonstration of any of the materials may be requested to

give you full understanding of them.



The checksheet is one time through materials and practical.



WORD CLEARING METHOD NO. 1 TO END PHENOMENA HAS BEEN DONE, WITH



ALL WORDS TAKEN TO FN.



________________



A. ORIENTATION SECTION



* HCO PL 15 Jun 70 Keeping Scientology working ____ ____ ___



* HCO PL 17 Jun 70 Technical Degrades ____ ____ ___



* HCO PL 11 Jun 64 New Student Data ____ ____ ___



HCOB 25 Jun 71 The Three Barriers to Study ____ ____ ___



* HCO PL 31 May 68 Auditors ____ ____ ___



HCO PL 31 Aug 74 Fast Flow Training Re- instated ____ ____ ___





B. POINT SYSTEM



BPL 17 May 71 RA II Rev. 10 Jun 74 Study Points & Conditions ____ ____ ___





C. GENERAL COURSE DATA



* HCO PL 27 May 65 Processing ____ ____ ___



* HCO PL 15 Dec 65 Student's Guide to Acceptable Behaviour ____ ____ ___



* HCO PL 14 Feb 65 Safeguarding Technology Reissued 7 Jun 67 ____ ____ ___



HCO PL 27 Sep 66 The Anti- Social Personality ____ ____ ___



* HCO PL 22 Nov 67 Out Tech ____ ____ ___



* HCO PL 8 Jun 70 Student Auditing ____ ____ ___





D. BOOKS ( to be read by end of course )



Dianetics 55 ____ ____ ___



Self Analysis ____ ____ ___



Axioms & Logics ( Axioms Section ) ____ ____ ___





E. CHARTS



BPL 25 Jun 70R Classification & Gradation Chart Level 0 Section ____ ____ ___



HCOB 25 Sep 71R Tone Scale in Full Rev. 4 April 74 ____ ____ ___





DRILL :



REF: BTB 20 July 74 Auditor Expertise Drills

Series No. 1 Basic Drills



ED 3 Observing the Obvious Unbullbaited ____ ____ ___



ED 4 Observing the Obvious Bullbaited ____ ____ ___



ED 5 Learning the Tone Scale Unbullbaited ____ ____ ___



ED 6 Learning the Tone Scale Bullbaited ____ ____ ___



ED 7 Obnosis and the Tone Scale Unbullbaited ____ ____ ___



ED 8 Obnosis and the Tone Scale Bullbaited ____ ____ ___





F. CODES



* HCO PL 14 Oct 68 Auditors Code AD18 ____ ____ ___



* HCO PL 2 Nov 68 Auditors Code AD18 Additions ____ ____ ___



CLAY DEMO : Each point of the Auditors Code. ____ ____ ___





G. AUDITOR ADMIN SECTION



BTB 6 Nov 72 Auditor Admin series No. 14 The Worksheets ____ ____ ___



BTB 6 Nov 72 Auditor Admin Series No. 13 Auditors Report Form ____ ____ ___



BTB 6 Nov 72 Auditor Admin Series No. 12 Summary Report Form ____ ____ ___



BTB 6 Nov 72 Auditor Admin Series No. 11 Exam Report ____ ____ ___



BTB 6 Nov 72 Auditor Admin Series No. 7 Folder Summary ____ ____ ___



BTB 24 Apr 69R PC Assessment Sheet Rev. 8 Sept 74 ____ ____ ___



BPL 23 Apr 68 Parent/Guardian Consent Form ____ ____ ___



DRILL : Make up a " Dummy " PC Folder with all the proper

forms and worksheets filled out and in correct order

in the folder ____ ____ ___



DO IT : Check your PC's folder to see if the folder summary

is up to date and accurate ; if it is not, then bring it up

to date accurately ____ ____ ___



H. TRs



HCOB 16 Aug 71 Training Drills Modernised ____ ____ ___



CLAY DEMO: Axiom 28 ____ ____ ___



Listen to an LRH Demo tape of an Auditing Session before

and while drilling each TR. Listen specifically for the aspects

of TR 0 ( presence ), TR 1, TR 2, TR 3 and TR 4 for each Tr

as you get to it.



* OT TR 0 ____ ____ ____



* TR 0 ____ ____ ____



* TR 0 BB ____ ____ ____



* TR 1 ____ ____ ____



* TR 2 ____ ____ ____



* TR 3 ____ ____ ____



* TR 4 ____ ____ ____





I. FALSE__TA



* HCOB 24 Oct 71 False TA ____ ____ ___



* HCOB 12 Nov 71 False TA Addition 1 ____ ____ ___



* HCOB 15 Feb 72 False TA Addition 2 ____ ____ ___



* HCOB 18 Feb 72R False TA Addition 3 ____ ____ ___



* HCOB 29 Feb 72R False TA Checklist Rev. 23 Nov 73 ____ ____ ___



* HCOB 23 Nov 73 Dry and Wet Hands make False TA ____ ____ ___



DRILL : Identifying and handling False TA. ____ ____ ___





J . FN_DATA



* HCOB 21 Oct 68 Floating Needle ____ ____ ___



* HCOB 11 Feb 66 Free needles & how to get them on a PC ____ ____ ___



* HCOB 21 Sep 66 ARC Break Needle ____ ____ ___



* HCOB 20 Feb 70 Floating Needles and End Phenomena ____ ____ ___



* HCOB 8 Oct 70 Persistent FN ____ ____ ___



* HCOB 21 Mar 74 End Phenomena ____ ____ ___



* HCOB 14 Mar 71 FN Everything ____ ____ ___



CLAY DEMO : A full EP showing PC's Bank etc. ____ ____ ___





K. METER_DATA



* The Book "Introducing the E- Meter" ____ ____ ___



* HCOB 14 Oct 68 " You must never never . . ." ____ ____ ___



HCOB 11 May 69 Meter Trim Check ____ ____ ___



BTB 14 Jan 63 Rings causing Rockslams ____ ____ ___



* HCOB 18 Mar 74 E- Meter Sensitivity Errors ____ ____ ___





DRILL :



BTB 16 Jun 71 Advanced E - Meter Drills Trim Check Drill ____ ____ ___



* HCOB 11 May 69R Meter Trim Check Rev. 8 Jul 78 ____ ____ ___





L. METER_DRILLS



HCOB 23 May 71 IX Metering ____ ____ ___



* HCOB 10 Dec 65 E - Meter Coaching ____ ____ ___



* 1. ____ ____ ___ * 10. ____ ____ ___ * 19. ____ ____ ___



* 2. ____ ____ ___ * 11. ____ ____ ___ * 20. ____ ____ ___



* 3. ____ ____ ___ * 12. ____ ____ ___ * 21. ____ ____ ___



* 4. ____ ____ ___ * 13. ____ ____ ___



* 5. ____ ____ ___ * 14. ____ ____ ___



* 6. ____ ____ ___ * 15. ____ ____ ___



* 7. ____ ____ ___ * 16. ____ ____ ___



* 8. ____ ____ ___ * 17. ____ ____ ___



* 9. ____ ____ ___ * 18. ____ ____ ___





M. AUDITOR MUST NOTS



* HCOB 7 Apr 64 All Levels Q & A ____ ____ ___



* HCOB 3 Aug 65 Auditor Goofs - Blowdown Interuptions ____ ____ ___



* HCOB 5 Feb 66 II "Letting the PC Itsa" The 

Properly Trained Auditor ____ ____ ___



* HCOB 7 May 69 5 GAEs ____ ____ ___



* HCOB 17 May 69 TRs & Dirty Needles ____ ____ ___



BTB 4 July 69 Auditing of OT III Preclears ____ ____ ___



BTB 17 July 69 Flagrant Auditing Errors ____ ____ ___



* CLAY DEMO : 



(a) The 5 GAEs. ____ ____ ___

(b) The effect on the PC of Blowdown interuption. ____ ____ ___

(c) Three examples of Q & A. ____ ____ ___





N. INDICATORS



* HCOB 29 Jul 64 Good Indicators at Lower Levels ____ ____ ___



* BTB 26 Apr 69 Bad Indicators at Lower Levels ____ ____ ___



DRILLS: BTB 20 Jul 74 Auditor Expertise Drills Series No. 1

Basic Auditing Drills



ED 13 Unbullbaited ____ ____ ___



ED 14 Bullbaited ____ ____ ___





O. MODEL SESSION & RUDIMENTS



* HCO PL 4 Apr 72R Ethics and Study Tech Rev. 7 Apr 72 ____ ____ ___



* HCOB 14 Nov 65 Clearing Commands ____ ____ ___



* BTB 2 May 72R Clearing Commands Rev. 10 Jun 74 ____ ____ ___



* BTB 18 Nov 68R Model Session ____ ____ ___



* HCOB 15 Aug 69 Flying Ruds ____ ____ ___



* BTB 11 Apr 74 Handling ARC Breaks ____ ____ ___



* HCOB 23 Aug 71 C/S Series No. 1 Auditors Rights ____ ____ ___



DRILLS: BTB 15 Dec 74 Auditor Expertise Drills Series No. 2



Basic Sessions Actions Drills



ED 21 Flying Ruds Unbullbaited ____ ____ ___



ED 22 Flying Ruds Bullbaited ____ ____ ___



DO IT : Fly Ruds on another student; turn your PC's folder in

to the Academy C/S when done. ____ ____ ___





P. THEORY OF THE COMM CYCLE



HCOB 6 Nov 64 Styles of Auditing ____ ____ ___



* HCOB 30 Apr 71 Auditing Comm Cycle ____ ____ ___



* HCOB 23 May 71 II The 2 Parts of Auditing ____ ____ ___



* HCOB 23 May 71 III The Three Important Comm Lines ____ ____ ___



* HCOB 23 May 71 IV Communication Cycles

Within the Auditing Comm Cycle ____ ____ ___



* HCOB 23 May 71 V The Communication Cycle in Auditing ____ ____ ___



* HCOB 12 Jan 59 Tone of voice acknowledgements ____ ____ ___



* HCOB 17 Oct 62 Auditor Failure to Understand ____ ____ ___



* HCOB 7 Apr 65 Premature Acknowledgements ____ ____ ___



* HCO PL 1 Jul 65 Comm Cycle Additives ____ ____ ___



HCOB 29 Sep 65 Cyclical & Non-Cyclical

Process Conclusions ____ ____ ___





Q. TAPES



* 24 May 62 E-Meter Data: Instant Reads Part I ____ ____ ___



* 24 May 62 E-Meter Data: Instant Reads Part II ____ ____ ___



* 25 July 63 Comm Cycles in Auditing ____ ____ ___



* 6 Aug 63 Auditing Comm Cycles ____ ____ ___



* 20 Aug 63 Itsa Line ____ ____ ___



* 21 Aug 63 Itsa Line ( Cont'd ) ____ ____ ___



* 6 Feb 64 The Communication Cycle in Auditing ____ ____ ___



CLAY DEMO : 1. The Auditing Comm Cycle and what

happens in the bank. ____ ____ ___



2. Axiom 28. ( Ref: HCO PL 7 Apr 74

Ethics and Study Tech. ) ____ ____ ___



3. The purpose of Level 0. ____ ____ ___



4. The Full End Phenomena of Grade 0 Ability Attained. ____ ____ ___





R. ARC STRAIGHTWIRE PROCESSES



NOTE: See HCOB 17 Mar 74 TWC Checksheets. " TWC Using

Wrong Questions " before studying, Drilling and using the

processes.



USE: BTB 9 Oct 71R ARC Straightwire Drills ____ ____ ___





REMEMBER SOMETHING



* BOOK: Dianetics 55! Chapter on Six Basic Processes ____ ____ ___



DRILL: TR 00-1 ____ ____ ___



TR 00-2 ____ ____ ___





RECALL A TIME



* HCOB 16 Feb 59 Staff Auditors Conference ____ ____ ___



DRILL: TR 00-3 ____ ____ ___



TR 00-4 ____ ____ ___





COMM RECALL PROCESS



* HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process ____ ____ ___



DRILL: TR 00-5 ____ ____ ___



TR 00-6 ____ ____ ___





THE ONLY BASIC AFFINITY PROCESS



* HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process ____ ____ ___



DRILL: TR 00-7 ____ ____ ___



TR 00-8 ____ ____ ___





EXHAUSTION



* HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process ____ ____ ___



DRILL: TR 00-9 ____ ____ ___



TR 00-10 ____ ____ ___





PAST AND FUTURE EXPERIENCE



* HCOB 16 Feb 59 HGC Processes for Those Trained in Engram 

Running ( applicable parts only ) ____ ____ ___



* HCOB 16 Feb 59 Staff Auditors Conference ____ ____ ___



DRILL: TR 00-11 ____ ____ ___



TR 00-12 ____ ____ ___





FORGETTING SIX WAY BRACKET



* HCOB 8 Apr 58 A Pair of Processes ____ ____ ___



PAB 143 ____ ____ ___



DRILL: TR 00-13 ____ ____ ___



TR 00-14 ____ ____ ___





CAUSE ELEMENTARY STRAIGHTWIRE



* HCOB 9 Mar 60 Expansion of OT-3A Procedure

Step Two HGC Allowed Processes ____ ____ ___



* HCOB 20 Apr 60 Processes ____ ____ ___



DRILL: TR 00-15 ____ ____ ___



TR 00-16 ____ ____ ___





DUPLICATION STRAIGHTWIRE



* HCOB 9 Mar 60 Expansion of OT-3A Procedure



Step Two HGC Allowed Processes ____ ____ ___



DRILL: TR 00-17 ____ ____ ___



TR 00-18 ____ ____ ___





KNOW TO MYSTERY RECALL PROCESS



* HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process ____ ____ ___



* BOOK: Scientology 0 - 8 Expanded Know to Mystery Scale

____ ____ ___



DRILL: TR 00-19 ____ ____ ___



TR 00-20 ____ ____ ___





SELF ANALYSIS



BOOK: Self Analysis * and run per instructions

in book, Lists 1 - 12 ____ ____ ___



DRILL: TR 00-21 ____ ____ ___



TR 00-22 ____ ____ ___





ARC STRAIGHTWIRE TRIPLES



* HCOB 27 Sep 68 ARC Straightwire ____ ____ ___



DRILL: TR 00-23 ____ ____ ___



TR 00-24 ____ ____ ___





HAVINGNESS



BTB 4 Jan 72R 0 - IV Expanded Grades Processes - Triples Part A

Rev. 28 June 74 ARC Straightwire Havingness ____ ____ ___



DRILL: TR 00-25 ____ ____ ___



TR 00-26 ____ ____ ___







S. LEVEL 0 PROCESSES



BTB 5 Jan 72R Grade 0 Processes



USE: BTB 9 Oct 71R Level 0 Drills ____ ____ ___





R2-31 BEINGNESS PROCESSING



* BOOK Creation of Human Ability - R2-31 ____ ____ ___



DRILL: TR 00-27 ____ ____ ___



TR 00-28 ____ ____ ___





AXIOM 51 COMM PROCESSING



* PAB 56 ____ ____ ___



DRILL: TR 00-29 ____ ____ ___



TR 00-30 ____ ____ ___





PAB 54 COMM PROCESS



* PAB 54 ____ ____ ___



DRILL: TR 00-31 ____ ____ ___



TR 00-32 ____ ____ ___





AN OBVIOUS BASIC PROCESS



* HCOB 17 Mar 60 Standardised Sessions ____ ____ ___



DRILL: TR 00-33 ____ ____ ___



TR 00-34 ____ ____ ___





AN AFFINITY PROCESS



* HCOB 4 May 59 An Affinity Process ____ ____ ___



DRILL: TR 00-35 ____ ____ ___



TR 00-36 ____ ____ ___





IN SEQUENCE



* HCOB 2 MAR 61 New Pre-hav Command ____ ____ ___



DRILL: TR 00-37 ____ ____ ___



TR 00-38 ____ ____ ___





UNIVERSE PROCESSING



* HCOB 25 Sep 59 HAS Co-Audit ____ ____ ___



DRILL: TR 00-39 ____ ____ ___



TR 00-40 ____ ____ ___





LOCATIONAL BODY COMM



* HCOB 21 Jul 59 HGC Allowed Processes ____ ____ ___



DRILL: TR 00-41 ____ ____ ___



TR 00-42 ____ ____ ___





A CLEARING PROCEDURE



* HCOB 21 Jul 59 HGC Allowed Processes ____ ____ ___



DRILL: TR 00-43 ____ ____ ___



TR 00-44 ____ ____ ___





PROCESS S-2



* HCOB 21 Jul 59 HGC Allowed Processes ____ ____ ___



DRILL: TR 00-45 ____ ____ ___



TR 00-46 ____ ____ ___





R2-60 THE HIDDEN COMMUNICATION



* BOOK: Creation of Human Ability - R2-60 ____ ____ ___



* BOOK: Scientology 0 - 8 ____ ____ ___



DRILL: TR 00-47 ____ ____ ___



TR 00-48 ____ ____ ___





R2-60 KNOW TO MYSTERY PROCESS



* BOOK: Creation of Human Ability - R2-60 ____ ____ ___



DRILL: TR 00-49 ____ ____ ___



TR 00-50 ____ ____ ___





EXPANDED CDEI COMM PROCESS



* HCOB 13 Oct 59 DEI Expanded Scale ____ ____ ___



* BOOK: Scientology 0 - 8 ____ ____ ___



DRILL: TR 00-51 ____ ____ ___



TR 00-52 ____ ____ ___





LOCATIONAL COMM PROCESS



* HCOB 7 May 59 New Process ____ ____ ___



DRILL: TR 00-53 ____ ____ ___



TR 00-54 ____ ____ ___





REMEDY OF COMM SCARCITY



* BOOK: 8 - 8008 ( six levels of processing ) ____ ____ ___



DRILL: TR 00-55 ____ ____ ___



TR 00-56 ____ ____ ___





GRADE ZERO TRIPLE



* HCOB 11 Dec 64 Scientology 0 Processes ____ ____ ___



* HCOB 26 Dec 64 Routine 0- A Expanded ____ ____ ___



BTB 5 Jan 72R 0 - IV Expanded Grade



Processes Triples Part B



Grade 0 Triple Processes ____ ____ ___



DRILL: TR 00-57 ____ ____ ___



TR 00-58 ____ ____ ___





HAVINGNESS



BTB 5 Jan 72R Grade 0 Processes



Havingness Process ____ ____ ___



DRILL: TR 00-59 ____ ____ ___



TR 00-60 ____ ____ ___





T. AUDITING SECTION



Audit a minimum of one person to Expanded

Grade 0 Release ____ ____ ___



STUDENT ATTEST : _________________________ DATE: ____________________



ACADEMY C/S : ____________________________ DATE: ____________________





U. STUDENT COMPLETION



I have completed the requirements of this checksheet and I

know and can apply this material.



STUDENT ATTEST : _______________________ DATE: ____________________





V. SUPERVISOR



I have trained this student to the best of my ability and

he/she has completed the requirements of this checksheet

and knows and can apply the checksheet data.



SUPERVISOR : ____________________________ DATE: ____________________





W. STUDENT ATTEST AT C&A



I attest:



A. I have enroled on the course.



B. I have paid for the course.



C. I have studied and understand all the materials

on the checksheet.



D. I have done all the drills on this checksheet.



E. I can produce an Expanded Grade 0 Release.





STUDENT ATTEST : ________________________ DATE: ___________________



C&A : _______________________________________





X. CERTS AND AWARDS



Provisional Class 0 Certificate issued.



C&A : _____________________________________ DATE:____________________



Route to Course Admin for filing in the students folder.





Training and Services Aide

Revised by

W/O Ron Shafran, CS-4

and Flag Mission 1234

Reissued as BPL

by Flag Mission 1234

I/C: CPO Andrea Lewis

2nd: Molly Harlow

Authorised by AVU

for the

BOARDS OF DIRECTORS

of the

CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY



BDCS:HH:BW:RS:AL:MH:mh 

Copyright c 1972, 1974 

by L. Ron Hubbard 

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 



********



02. HCOPL  7 FEB 65 reiss. 15 JUN 70 Keeping Scientology Working



HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE



Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



HCO POLICY LETTER OF 7 FEBRUARY 1965



REISSUED 15 JUNE 1970



(Corrected per Flag Issue 28.1.73)



Remimeo 

Sthil Students

Assn/Org Sec Hat

HCO Sec Hat

Case Sup Hat

Ds of P Hat

Ds of T Hat

Staff Member Hat

Franchise

(issued May 1965)



Note: Neglect of this Pol Ltr has caused great hardship on

staffs, has cost countless millions and made it necessary

in 1970 to engage in an all out International effort to

restore basic Scientology over the world. Within 5 years

after the issue of this PL with me off the lines, violation

had almost destroyed orgs. "Quickie grades" entered in and

denied gain to tens of thousands of cases. Therefore

actions which neglect or violate this Policy Letter are

HIGH CRIMES resulting in Comm Evs on ADMINISTRATORS and

EXECUTIVES. It is not "entirely a tech matter" as its

neglect destroys orgs and caused a 2 year slump. IT IS THE

BUSINESS OF EVERY STAFF MEMBER to enforce it.



ALL LEVELS



KEEPING SCIENTOLOGY WORKING



HCO Sec or Communicator Hat Check

on all personnel and new personnel

as taken on.





We have some time since passed the point of achieving

uniformly workable technology.



The only thing now is getting the technology applied.



If you can't get the technology applied then you can't

deliver what's promised. It's as simple as that. If you can

get the technology applied, you can deliver what's promised.



The only thing you can be upbraided for by students or pcs

is "no results". Trouble spots occur only where there are

"no results". Attacks from governments or monopolies occur

only where there are "no results" or "bad results".



Therefore the road before Scientology is clear and its

ultimate success is assured if the technology is applied.



So it is the task of the Assn or Org Sec, the HCO Sec, the

Case Supervisor, the D of P, the D of T and all staff

members to get the correct technology applied.



Getting the correct technology applied consists of:



One: Having the correct technology.



Two: Knowing the technology.



Three: Knowing it is correct.



Four: Teaching correctly the correct technology.



Five: Applying the technology.



Six: Seeing that the technology is correctly applied.



Seven: Hammering out of existence incorrect technology.



Eight: Knocking out incorrect applications.



Nine: Closing the door on any possibility of incorrect technology.



Ten: Closing the door on incorrect application.



One above has been done.



Two has been achieved by many.



Three is achieved by the individual applying the correct

technology in a proper manner and observing that it works

that way.



Four is being done daily successfully in most parts of the world.



Five is consistently accomplished daily.



Six is achieved by instructors and supervisors consistently.



Seven is done by a few but is a weak point.



Eight is not worked on hard enough.



Nine is impeded by the "reasonable" attitude of the not

quite bright.



Ten is seldom done with enough ferocity.



Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten are the only places Scientology

can bog down in any area.



The reasons for this are not hard to find. (a) A weak

certainty that it works in Three above can lead to weakness

in Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten. (b) Further, the

not-too-bright have a bad point on the button

Self-Importance. (c) The lower the IQ, the more the

individual is shut off from the fruits of observation. (d)

The service facs of people make them defend themselves

against anything they confront good or bad and seek to make

it wrong. (e) The bank seeks to knock out the good and

perpetuate the bad.



Thus, we as Scientologists and as an organization must be

very alert to Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten.



In all the years I have been engaged in research I have

kept my comm lines wide open for research data. I once had

the idea that a group could evolve truth. A third of

Century has thoroughly disabused me of that idea. Willing

as I was to accept suggestions and data, only a handful of

suggestions (less than twenty) had long run value and none

were major or basic; and when I did accept major or basic

suggestions and used them, we went astray and I repented

and eventually had to "eat crow".



On the other hand there have been thousands and thousands

of suggestions and writings which, if accepted and acted

upon, would have resulted in the complete destruction of

all our work as well as the sanity of pcs. So I know what a

group of people will do and how insane they will go in

accepting unworkable "technology". By actual record the

percentages are about twenty to 100,000 that a group of

human beings will dream up bad technology to destroy good

technology. As we could have gotten along without

suggestions, then, we had better steel ourselves 

to continue to do so now that we have made it.

This point will, of course, be attacked as "unpopular"

"egotistical" and "undemocratic". It very well may be. But

it is also a survival point And I don't see that popular

measures, self- abnegation and democracy have done anything

for Man but push him further into the mud. Currently,

popularity endorse degraded novels, self- abnegation has

filled the South East Asian jungles with stone idols and

corpses, and democracy has given us inflation and income tax.



Our technology has not been discovered by a group. True, if

the group had no supported me in many ways I could not have

discovered it either. But it remains that in its formative

stages it was not discovered by a group, then group

efforts, one can safely assume, will not add to it or

successfully alter it in the future. I can only say this

now that it is done.



There remains, of course, group tabulation or co-ordination

of what has been done, which will be valuable-only so long

as it does not seek to alter basic principles and

successful applications.



The contributions that were worth while in this period of

forming the technology were help in the form of friendship,

of defence, of organization, of dissemination, of

application, of advices on results and of finance. These

were great contributions and were, and are, appreciated.

Many thousands contributed in this way and made us what we

are. Discovery contribution was not however part of the

broad picture.



We will not speculate here on why this was so or how I came

to rise above the bank.



We are dealing only in facts and the above is a fact-the

group left to its own devices would not have evolved

Scientology but with wild dramatization of the bank called

"new ideas" would have wiped it out. Supporting this is the

fact that Man has never before evolved workable mental

technology and emphasizing it is the vicious technology he

did evolve-psychiatry, psychology, surgery, shock

treatment, whips, duress, punishment, etc, ad infinitum.



So realize that we have climbed out of the mud by whatever

good luck and good sense, and refuse to sink back into it

again. See that Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten above are

ruthlessly followed and we will never be stopped. Relax

them, get reasonable about it and we will perish.



So far, while keeping myself in complete communication with

all suggestions, I have not failed on Seven, Eight, Nine

and Ten in areas I could supervise closely. But it's not

good enough for just myself and a few others to work at this.



Whenever this control as per Seven, Eight. Nine and Ten has

been relaxed the whole organizational area has failed.

Witness Elizabeth, N.l., Wichita, the early organizations

and groups. They crashed only because I no longer did

Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten. Then, when they were all messed

up you saw the obvious "reasons" for failure. But ahead of

that they ceased to deliver and that involved them in other

reasons.



The common denominator of a group is the reactive bank.

Thetans without banks have different responses. They only

have their banks in common. They agree then only on bank

principles. Person to person the bank is identical. So

constructive ideas are individual and seldom get broad

agreement in a human group. An individual must rise above

an avid craving for agreement from a humanoid group to get

anything decent done. The bank-agreement has been what has

made Earth a Hell-and if you were looking for Hell and

found Earth, it would certainly serve. War, famine, agony

and disease has been the lot of Man. Right now the great

governments of Earth have developed the means of frying

every Man, Woman and Child on the planet. That is Bank.

That is the result of Collective Thought Agreement. The

decent, pleasant things on this planet come from individual

actions and ideas that have somehow gotten by the Group

Idea. For that matter, look how we ourselves are attacked

by "public opinion" media.



Yet there is no more ethical group on this planet than ourselves.



Thus each one of us can rise above the domination of the

bank and then, as a group of freed beings, achieve freedom

and reason. It is only the aberrated group, the mob, that

is destructive.



When you don't do Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten actively, you

are working for the Bank dominated mob. For it will surely,

surely (a) introduce incorrect technology and swear by it,

(b) apply technology as incorrectly as possible, (c) open

the door to any destructive idea, and (d) encourage

incorrect application.



It's the Bank that says the group is all and the individual

nothing. It's the Bank that says we must fail.



So just don't play that tune. Do Seven. Eight, Nine and Ten

and you will knock out of your road all the future thorns.



Here's an actual example in which a senior executive had to

interfere because of a pc spin: A Case Supervisor told

Instructor A to have Auditor B run Process X on Preclear C.



Auditor B afterwards told Instructor A that "It didn't

work." Instructor A was weak on Three above and didn't

really believe in Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten. So Instructor

A told the Case Supervisor "Process X didn't work on

Preclear C." Now this strikes directly at each of One to

Six above in Preclear C, Auditor B, Instructor A and the

Case Supervisor. It opens the door to the introduction of

"new technology" and to failure.



What happened here? Instructor A didn't jump down Auditor

B's throat, that's all that happened. This is what he

should have done: Grabbed the Auditor's report and looked

it over, When a higher executive on this case did so she

found what the Case Supervisor and the rest missed: that.

Process X increased Preclear C's TA to 25 TA divisions for

the session but that near session end Auditor B Qed and Aed

with a cognition and abandoned Process X while it still

gave high TA and went off running one of Auditor B's own

manufacture, which nearly spun Preclear C. Auditor B's IQ

on examination turned out to be about 75. Instructor A was

found to have huge ideas of how you must never invalidate

anyone, even a lunatic. The Case Supervisor was found to be

"too busy with admin to have any time for actual cases".



All right, there's an all too typical example. The

Instructor should have done Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten.

This would have begun this way. Auditor B: "That process X

didn't work." Instructor A: "What exactly did you do

wrong?" Instant attack. "Where's your auditor's report for

the session? Good. Look here, you were getting a lot of TA

when you stopped Process X. What did you do?" Then the Pc

wouldn't have come close to a spin and all four of these

would have retained certainty.



In a year, I had four instances in one small group where

the correct process recommended was reported not to have

worked. But on review found that each one had (a) increased

the TA, (b) had been abandoned, and (c) had been falsely

reported as unworkable.



Also, despite this abuse, in each of these four cases the

recommended, correct process cracked the case. Yet they

were reported as not having worked!



Similar examples exist in instruction and these are all the

more deadly as every time instruction in correct technology

is flubbed, then the resulting error, uncorrected in the

auditor, is perpetuated on every pc that auditor audits

thereafter. So Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten are even more

important in a course than in supervision of cases.



Here's an example: A rave recommendation is given a

graduating student "because he gets more TA on pcs than any

other student on the course!" Figures of 435 TA divisions a

session are reported. "Of course his model session is poor

but it's just knack he has" is also included in the

recommendation. A careful review is undertake because

nobody at levels O to IV is going to get that much TA on

pcs. It is found that this student was never taught to read

an E-Meter dial! And no instructor observed his handling of

a meter and it was not discovered that he "overcompensated"

nervously swinging the TA 2 or 3 divisions beyond where it

needed to go to place the needle at "set". So everyone was

about to throw away standard processes and model session

because this one student "got such remarkable TA". They

only read the reports and listened to the brags and never

looked at this student. The pcs in actual fact were making

slightly less than average gain, impeded by a rough model

session and misworded processes.



Thus, what was making the pcs win (actual Scientology) was

hidden under a lot of departures and errors.



I recall one student who was squirreling on an Academy

course and running a lot of off-beat whole track on other

students after course hours. The academy students were in a

state of electrification on all these new experiences and

weren't quickly brought under control and the student

himself never was given the works on Seven, Eight, Nine and

Ten so they stuck.



Subsequently, this student prevented another squirrel from

being straightened out and his wife died of cancer

resulting from physical abuse. A hard, tough instructor at

that moment could have salvaged two squirrels and saved the

life of a girl. But no, students had a right to do whatever

they pleased.



Squirreling (going off into weird practices or altering

Scientology) only comes about from non-comprehension.

Usually the non-comprehension is not of Scientology but

some earlier contact with an off-beat humanoid practice

which in its turn was not understood.



When people can't get results from what they think is

standard practice, they can be counted upon to squirrel to

some degree. The most trouble in the past two years came

from orgs where an executive in each could not assimilate

straight Scientology under instruction in Scientology they

were unable to define terms or demonstrate examples of

principles. And the orgs where they were got into plenty of

trouble. And worse, it could not be straightened out easily

because neither one of these people could or would

duplicate instructions. hence, a debacle resulted in two

places, directly traced to failures of instruction earlier.

So proper instruction is vital. The D of T and his

Instructors and all Scientology Instructors must be

merciless in getting Four, Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten into

effective action. That one student, dumb and impossible

though he may seem and of no use to anyone, may yet some

day be the cause of untold upset because nobody was

interested enough to make sure Scientology got home to him.



With what we know now, there is no student we enrol who

cannot be properly trained.



As an instructor, one should be very alert to slow progress

and should turn the sluggards inside out personally. No

system will do it, only you or me with our sleeve rolled up

can crack the back of bad studenting and we can only do it

on an individual student, never on a whole class only. He's

slow = something is awful wrong. Take fast action to

correct it. Don't wait until next week. By then he's got

other messes stuck to him. If you can't graduate them with

their good sense appealed to and wisdom shining graduate

them in such a state of shock they'll have nightmares if

they contemplate squirreling. Then experience will

gradually bring about Three in them and they'll know better

than to chase butterflies when they should be auditing.



When somebody enrols, consider he or she has joined up for

the duration of the universe- never permit an "open-minded"

approach. If they're going to quit let then quit fast. If

they enroled, they're aboard, and if they're aboard,

they're here on the same terms as the rest of us- win or

die in the attempt. Never let them be half-minded about

being Scientologists. The finest organizations in history

have been tough dedicated organizations. Not one

namby-pamby bunch of panty-waist dilettantes have ever made

anything. It's a tough universe. The social veneer makes it

seem mild. But only the tigers survive-and even they have a

hard time. We'll survive because we are tough and are

dedicated. When we do instruct somebody properly he becomes

more and more tiger. When we instruct half-mindedly and are

afraid to offend, scared to enforce, we don't make students

into good Scientologists and that let's everybody down.



When Mrs. Pattycake comes to us to be taught, turn that

wandering doubt in he eye into a fixed, dedicated glare and

she'll win and we'll all win. Humour her and we all die a

little. The proper instruction attitude is, "You're here so

you're a Scientologist Now we're going to make you into an

expert auditor no matter what happens. We'd rather have you

dead that incapable." Fitting that into the economics of

the situation and lack of adequate time and you see the

cross we have to bear.



But we won't have to bear it forever. The bigger we get the

more economics and time we will have to do our job. And the

only things which can prevent us from getting that big fast

are areas in from One to Ten. Keep those in mind and we'll

be able to grow. Fast. And as we grow our shackles will be

less and less. Failing to keep One to Ten, will make us

grow less.



So the ogre which might eat us up is not the government or

the High Priests. It's our possible failure to retain and

practise our technology.



An Instructor or Supervisor or Executive must challenge

with ferocity instances of "unworkability". They must

uncover what did happen, what was run and what was done or

not done.



If you have One and Two, you can only acquire Three for all

by making sure of all the rest.



We're not playing some minor game in Scientology. It isn't

cute or something to do for lack of something better.



The whole agonized future of this planet, every Man, Woman

and Child on it, and your own destiny for the next endless

trillions of years depends on what you do here and now with

and in Scientology.



This is a deadly serious activity. And if we miss getting

out of the trap now, we may never again have another chance.



Remember, this is a our first chance to do so in all the

endless trillions of years of the past. Don't muff it now

because it seems unpleasant or unsocial to do Seven, Eight,

Nine and Ten.



Do them and we'll win.



L. RON HUBBARD



Founder



LRH:jw.rr.nt.rd



Copyright c 1965, 1970

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



********



03. HCOPL 17 JUN 70 Technical Degrades





HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE



Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



HCO POLICY LETTER OF 17 JUNE 1970



Remimeo

Applies to all

SHs and 

Academies 

Franchises



URGENT AND IMPORTANT



TECHNICAL DEGRADES



(This PL and HCO PL Feb 7, 1965 must be made part of every

study pack as the first items and must be listed on

checksheets. )



Any checksheet in use or in stock which carries on it any

degrading statement must be destroyed and issued without

qualifying statements.



Example: Level 0 to IV Checksheets SH carry "A. Background

Material - This section is included as an historical

background, but has much interest and value to the student.

Most of the processes are no longer used, having been

replaced by more modern technology. The student is only

required to read this material and ensure he leaves no

misunderstood." This heading covers such vital things as

TRs, Op Pro by Dup! The statement is a falsehood.



These checksheets were not approved by myself, all the

material of the Academy and SH courses IS in use.



Such actions as this gave us "Quickie Grades", ARC Broke

the field and downgraded the Academy and SH Courses.



A condition of TREASON or cancellation of certificates or

dismissal and a full investigation of the background of any

person found guilty, will be activated in the case of

anyone committing the following HIGH CRIMES.



1. Abbreviating an official Course in Dianetics and

Scientology so as to lose the full theory, processes and

effectiveness of the subjects.



2. Adding comments to checksheets or instructions labelling

any material "background" or "not used now" or "old" or any

similar action which will result in the student not

knowing, using, and applying the data in which he is being

trained.



3. Employing after 1 Sept 1970 any checksheet for any

course not authorized by myself and the SO Organizing

Bureau Flag.



4. Failing to strike from any checksheet remaining in use

meanwhile any such comments as "historical", "background",

"not used", "old", etc. or VERBALLY STATING IT TO STUDENTS.



5. Permitting a pc to attest to more than one grade at a

time on the pc's own determinism without hint or evaluation.



6. Running only one process for a grade between 0 to IV.



7. Failing to use all processes for a level.



8. Boasting as to speed of delivery in a session, such as

"I put in Grade zero in 3 minutes." Etc.



9. Shortening time of application of auditing for financial

or laborsaving considerations.



10. Acting in any way calculated to lose the technology of

Dianetics and Scientology to use or impede its use or

shorten its materials or its application.



REASON: The effort to get students through courses and get

pcs processed in orgs was considered best handled by

reducing materials or deleting processes from grades. The

pressure exerted to speed up student completions and

auditing completions was mistakenly answered by just not

delivering.



The correct way to speed up a student's progress is by

using 2 way comm and applying the study materials to students.



The best way to really handle pcs is to ensure they make

each level fully before going on to the next and repairing

them when they do not.



The puzzle of the decline of the entire Scientology network

in the late 60s is entirely answered by the actions taken

to shorten time in study and in processing by deleting

materials and actions.



Reinstituting full use and delivery of Dianetics and

Scientology is the answer to any recovery.



The product of an org is well taught students and

thoroughly audited pcs. When the product vanishes, so does

the org. The orgs must survive for the sake of this planet.



L. RON HUBBARD



Founder

LRH:nt.rd

Copyright c 1970

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



********



04. HCOB  11 JUN 64 New Student Data





HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE



Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



HCO POLICY LETTER OF 11 JUNE 1964



Sthil Students



NEW STUDENTS DATA



STAR RATED FOR NEW STUDENTS





Tape Passes



On those live lectures you hear, when you take the Friday

tape examination and keep your exam paper when it is handed

back, and present it to Theory as evidence, any live

lecture you have so heard is credited on your check sheet

by Theory where the lecture appears on the check sheet.



Not all the lectures I give appear later on check sheets

but many do and you should get credit for those you have heard.



If you have a Friday exam paper on any lecture you have

heard live and the grade is above 90% for star rated and

above 75% for a 75, any grade for a zero rate, if the

lecture appears as a tape on your check sheets it will be

marked off as passed and initialled by a Theory Instructor.





Auditing Assignments



In auditing before the Level VI Co-audit, it is customary

to split up teams that will eventually co-audit to OT.



The reasons for this are



1. Auditing skill tends to become adapted to one pc and

deteriorate. This does not make a good pro, it makes only a

co- auditor. I'm making you into a pro, not a co auditor

regardless of classification status. I can't do that by

giving you just the pc you are already educated to run.

You'd be a one pc auditor.



2. Mutual withholds develop in teams and restrain auditing results.



3. Your auditing skill tends to look better or worse than it is.



We don't even wholly guarantee you and your co-auditor that

you will co-audit in the Level Vl Co-audit for one team

member may be Case type A and the other B. A Case type A

can run through anything. A Case type B stops at a comma.

Thus one gets too far out of pace with the other and it's

just too hard on one member of the team who would be, of

course, the Type B and already in trouble. It would be

selfish indeed of a Type A to force a Type B to run GPMs

far beyond where he or she has had them run. We will try to

put the team together in this Level VI Co-audit and mostly

do but this AB factor is a technical one and we can't do

anything about it short of good auditing.





Student Rules



A lot of students come a cropper on the rules and try to

carry on without concurrence.



You are only here for a few months. In your hands is your

next multi-trillion years.



The rules are there to get you through. Breaking them, in

my opinion, is too pricey.





Rapidity of Progress



A few new students arrive here in a high state of "know it

all, just want a few new gimmicks".



Students who have this state of mind just don't learn or

progress. And they really get stuck in. We're not doing it

to them. They are trying to learn over the top of their own

postulate that they already know it (when they don't) and

so get into a ridge. They're not stuck in the course.

They're stuck in this conflict.



In the first place, no new student at Saint Hill has ever

been known to give a standard session on arrival, despite

all the data being available. But they don't know enough

about auditing to know whether they're doing well or not,

much less know how to audit. Factually they usually look

pretty pitiful. There they are making Gross Auditing Errors

in an avalanche, missing comm cycles, feet in the pc's face

with their meter upside down, telling the Class Vl auditor

who is his Instructor "I know all about it. We had a course

in Slobovia much better than this one. The pcs audited the

auditor and it . . . ."



Well you can't blame the instructor if he seems to be

having a hard time to keep from laughing in the new

student's face. It's only their courtesy that keeps them

from reaching over and connecting the unconnected cans this

new genius has failed to plug into the meter as a fitting

touche.



Some auditors trained elsewhere with great ARC but precious

little "do it", don't have enough training to know they

aren't trained. And it's always the very worst trained

auditors who how; the loudest about how they don't need to

know. The majority relaxedly study and improve their skill,

get results and there it is.



I myself periodically study auditing and put a polish on my

own skill. I don't have to say "I don't know", but I'm not

so arrogant as to believe I'm above knowing how to do things.



So if every year or two I can study how to audit without

going into a long rigmarole about how I'm above all that, I

can reasonably expect others to have a sane view of their

own skill too.



Any skill can be improved—one can know more about an

subject—unless one has already decided he or she already

knows all about it.



The successful progress of a student is inversely

proportional to the student preconception of knowing it

already. An arrogant assumption of total knowing without

inspection is the surest way to make no progress.



One does or does not know the data before him. That's

elementary. Why should it become involved with emotionalism?



The fast student is not concerned with necessities to

maintain status by asserting how much he or she already

knows. The fast student is only interested in knowing what

he does not know, studying it and then knowing that he

knows it.



The slow student is so busy putting on that he knows that

he never finds out he doesn't in fact know. To do this

before a lot of experts such as Saint Hill Instructors

seems pretty pointless.



Results today are by the text book. Lack of results are

always attended by departures.



One can or cannot get results with auditing. This means

that one is or is not doing a text book job.



In our case the text book has 14 years of hard won

experience behind it. So text book auditing gets the best

results. It's that simple.



The statement "I know all about Scientology but I don't get

very good results" is a pretty silly statement today. It's

saying in fact "I pretend to more than I know and the flubs

show up in my results".



Well, that's getting right down to the reasons for slow

progress and calling a spade a spade, but it's awful true.

It's really the only reason back of slow progress on course.



The speed with which you complete your course and get to OT

is entirely regulated by the speed with which you discover

there's something here to learn.



Most students handle this very early. I'm sure you will.



I give you my good wishes for a fast progress.



L. RON HUBBARD



LRH:nt.rd

Copyright c 1964

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



********



05. HCOB  25 JUN 71R rev. 25 NOV 74 Barriers To Study



HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE



Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



HCO BULLETIN OF 25 JUNE 1971 R

REVISED 25 NOVEMBER 1974



Remimeo 

Tech & Qual

All Students

Supervisors Word Clearing Series 3R

Supervisor's Course

Cramming

Word Clearers





BARRIERS TO STUDY



There are three different sets of physiological and mental

reactions that come from 3 different aspects of study. They

are three different sets of symptoms.



( 1 ) Education in the absence of the mass in which the

technology will be involved is very hard on the student.



It actually makes him feel squashed. Makes him feel bent,

sort of spinny, sort of dead, bored, exasperated.



If he is studying the doingness of something in which the

mass is absent this will be the result.



Photographs help and motion pictures would do pretty good

as they are a sort of promise or hope of the mass but the

printed page and the spoken word are not a substitute for a

tractor if he's studying about tractors.



You have to understand this data in its purity—and that is

that educating a person in a mass that they don't have and

which isn't available produces physiological reactions.

That is what I am trying to teach you.



It's just a fact.



You're trying to teach this fellow all about tractors and

you're not giving him any tractors—well he's going to wind

up with a face that feels squashed, with headaches and with

his stomach feeling funny. He's going to feel dizzy from

time to time and very often his eyes are going to hurt.



It's a physiological datum that has to do with processing

and the field of the mind.



You could therefore expect the greatest incidence of

suicide or illness in that field of education most devoted

to studying absent masses.



This one of studying the something without its mass ever

being around produces the most distinctly recognizable

reactions.



If a child felt sick in the field of study and it were

traced back to this one, the positive remedy would be to

supply the mass—the object or a reasonable substitute— and

it would clear it up.



(2) There is another series of physiological phenomena that

exist which is based on the fact of too steep a study gradient.



That's another source of physiological study reaction

because of too steep a gradient.



It is a sort of a confusion or a reelingness that goes with

this one.



You've hit too steep a gradient.



There was too much of a jump because he didn't understand

what he was doing and he jumped to the next thing and that

was too steep and he went too fast and he will assign all

of his difficulties to this new thing.



Now differentiate here—because gradients sounds terribly

like the 3rd one of these study hang-ups, definitions—but

remember that they are quite distinctly different.



Gradients are more pronounced in the field of doingness but

they still hang over into the field of understanding. In

gradients however it is the actions we are interested in.

We have a plotted course of forward motion of actions. We

find he was terribly confused on the second action he was

supposed to do. We must assume then that he never really

got out of the first one.



The remedy for this one of too steep a gradient is cutting

back. Find out when he was not confused on the gradient,

then what new action he undertook to do. Find what action

he understood well. Just before he was all confused what

did he understand well—and then we find out that he didn't

understand it well.



It's really at the tail end of what he understood and then

he went over the gradient you see.



It is most recognizable and most applicable in the field of

doingness.



That's the gradient barrier and one full set of phenomena

accompanies that.



(3) There is this third one. An entirely different set of

physiological reactions brought about through—a bypassed

definition. A bypassed definition gives one a distinctly

blank feeling or a washed-out feeling. A not-there feeling

and a sort of nervous hysteria will follow in the back of that.



The manifestation of "blow" stems from this 3rd aspect of

study which is the misunderstood definition or the not

comprehended definition, the undefined word.



That's the one that produces the blow.



The person doesn't necessarily blow on these other two—they

are not pronouncedly blow phenomena. They are simply

physiological phenomena.



This one of the misunderstood definition is so much more

important. It's the make-up of human relations, the mind

and subjects. It establishes aptitude and lack of aptitude

and it's what psychologists have been trying to test for

years without recognizing what it was.



It's the definitions of words.



The misunderstood word.



That's all it goes back to and that produces such a vast

panorama of mental effects that it itself is the prime

factor involved with stupidity and the prime factor

involved with many other things.



If a person didn't have misunderstoods his talent might or

might not be present but his doingness would be present.



We can't say that Joe would paint as well as Bill if both

were unaberrated in the field of art, but we can say that

the inability of Joe to paint compared with the ability of

Joe to do the motions of painting is dependent exclusively

and only upon definitions—exclusively and only upon

definitions.



There is some word in the field of art that the person who

is inept didn't define or understand and that is followed

by an inability to act in the field of the arts.



That's very important because it tells you what happens to

doingness and that the restoration of doingness depends

only upon the restoration of understanding on the

misunderstood word—misunderstood definition.



This is very fast processing. There is a very swift wide

big result obtainable in this.



It has a technology which is a very simple technology.



It enters in at the lower levels because it has to. This

doesn't mean it is unimportant, it means it has to be at

the entrance gates of Scientology.



It IS a sweepingly fantastic discovery in the field of

education and don't neglect it.



You can trace back the subject a person is dumb in or any

allied subject that got mixed up with it. The psychologist

doesn't understand Scientology. He never understood a word

in psychology so he doesn't understand Scientology.



Well that opens the gate to Education. Although I've given

this one of the misunderstood definition last it is the

most important one.



L. RON HUBBARD

Founder



LRH:nt.rdjh

Copyright c 1971, 1974

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



********



06. HCOPL 31 MAY 68 Auditors





HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE



Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



HCO POLICY LETTER OF 31 MAY 1968



Issue II



(Reissued from Flag Order 808)



Remimeo



AUDITORS



Auditors have since the first session of Scientology been

the only individual on this planet, in this Universe

capable of freeing man.



An Auditor is one who has been trained in the technology of

Scientology. An Auditor applies standard technology to

pre-clears.



At times some will forget or chose to ignore the fact that

the Auditor is not just another fellow or a guy who works

in Scientology. An Auditor is a highly trained specialist,

no matter what level of Auditor. He or she is the only one

who can give man the truth, that man knows.



An Auditor is to be respected. An Auditor is very important

in Clearing this Planet, and this Universe. It's a big job

and the Auditor will do it. All Auditors are appreciated.



Special designations and insignia are to be developed to

distinguish the Auditor from others and signalize his class.



L. RON HUBBARD

Founder



LRH:sb.js

Copyright c 1968

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



********



07. BPL  17 MAY 71RA r. 13 NOV 72 r. 10 JUN 74 Study Points and Conditions





B O A R D P O L I C Y L E T T E R



17 MAY 1971 RA



ISSUE II RA



REVISED 13 NOVEMBER 1972



REVISED & REISSUED 10 JUNE 1974 AS BPL



CANCELS HCO POLICY LETTER OF 17 MAY 1971R

ISSUE II SAME TITLE



Remimeo 

All Staff 

All Students





STUDY POINTS AND CONDITIONS



(Revises and replaces HCO PL 25 Oct 70

of same title for all checksheets)



GOES INTO EFFECT WEEK ENDING 27 JUNE 1974.



This revised issue has been designed to even out earlier

inequities which gave artificial surges and slumps in

students' graphs, and adds points for handling

misunderstoods to further reward application of Study Tech.



The following point system is the standard point system and

is to be used on all Scientology and Dianetics Courses. It

cancels all previous point systems.



A point system is used so that students may accurately

measure their progress through a course. It further

provides a quantitative measurement of the production of a

course, Academy or Org.



The system itself is based on (1) how long a particular

study action takes and (2) the type of action it is. Thus

the practical is more heavily weighted than the theory,

since the purpose of study is application.



ALL POINTS MUST BE EARNED.



The point system assumes that the student knows and can

apply all the data for which he has gotten points. (See HCO

PL 26 May 1961 "Quality Counts".)



PARTICULAR EMPHASIS ON TOUGH EXCELLENT TRS AND METERING AND

UNDERSTANDING OF AUDITORS CODE IS REQUIRED.



SUPERLITERATES (those who have completed PRD) count their

points exactly the same as others. Eg. .an item marked

starrate on a checksheet is so counted by the SUPERLITERATE

even though not checked out by another.



STUDY ACTION  -------------------  POINTS



0. Misunderstood word from         1 point per word.

materials defined and cleared.



or



Word defined and cleared           3 points per word.

on the PRD



1. Any written material (except    O-rate 3 points per page

as noted otherwise below).         *-rate 5 points per page



2. Tapes                           O-rate 60 (60 min tape)

                                   O-rate 90 (90 min tape)

                                   *-rate 75 (60 min tape)

                                   *-rate 100 (90 min tape)





3. Clay demonstrations (only       25

credited if done precisely

per HCO B 11 Oct 67 "Clay

Table Training". Demos must

be of good large size and show

what's being demonstrated.

Points are counted per demo

rather than per item on check-

sheet where any one item re-

quired more than one demo.)



4. Essays                         10



5. Study LRH C/Sed Sessions       10 per session



6. TRs (Wherever TRs are done,the

following is required):



OT TR-O to major stable win       50 per hour plus

                                  50 for passing



TR-O to a major stable win

nonbullbaited pass.               50 per hour plus

                                 100 for passing



TR-O Bullbaited to a major        50 per hour plus

stable win                        50 for passing



Other TRs to 10 unflunked         60 each

consecutive actions. Each

previous TR to be in.



TR 101                            25



TR 102 (All done thoroughly.      50



TR 103 All TRs to be in.)         75



TR 104                           100



7. E-Meter Drills (except for     15 per drill

the following)



E-Meter Drills 17, 20, 21, 26     25 per drill



Instant Read and Assessment       50 per drill

Drills



Dating drills                    120 per drill





8. Doll Drills - All thoroughly   30

done to a good pass - thoroughly

done with TRs in.



Bullbaited Drills coached to      75

a flubless pass.





9. Films                         O-rate same as for tapes

                                 *-rate same as for tapes





10. Codes and Axioms- To         O-rate 1 per code or Axiom

be thoroughly under-             *-rate 10 per code or Axiom

stood. If clay demos

done, the clay demo

points apply.



11. Scales - To be               O-rate 15 per scale

thoroughly understood.           *-rate 25 per scale

If clay demos done,

the clay demo points

apply.



12. Charts                       *-rate 75

                                 O-rate 25



1 column of a chart or           *-rate 15

1 level                          O-rate 10





13. Student Auditing

requirements:



Flunked Session                  0

Not Flunked Session             60 per auditing hr

Well Done Session              100 per auditing hr

Very Well Done Session         120 per auditing hr



14. Student Folder Error        10 per session

Summaries



Student PC Program -           100

correct and accepted.



Dianetic Flow table            100





15. Student C/S - correct and   15 per C/S

accepted. (includes session

admin time)



16. Coaching another student   same points as student

through a drill                for that drill



Completing a student fully     500 point bonus -

on Dianetics or on Ex-         provided student

panded Grade                   delivered at a

                               minimum rate of 25

                               WDAHs in the chair per

                               week in delivering the

                               grade.



Coaching another student       0

but failure to complete

to a pass





17. Twin Checkouts - not       5 per checkout given

coaching                       whether flunked or

                               passed



M3 on another student          3 points for each

                               word found and cleared



18. Official Examinations      200 for exam passed

                                   or

                               100 for attest



19. Specialist Training -      60 points per hour

practical, not other-

wise covered.



ADDITIONAL:



A. Hat checkouts, etc.         follow study points system

                               for individual items



B. Full Org Board drawn        120

up and posted - for

any purpose.





STUDENT CONDITIONS



FULL TIME STUDY = 8 hours a day, 7 days a week.



PART TIME STUDY = 2 1/2 hours a day, 7 days a week.





CONDITION     POINTS          POINTS

              PART TIME       FULL TIME



POWER         1800 or above   5600 or above



AFFLUENCE     1600 - 1799     5000 - 5599



NORMAL        1400 - 1599     4500 - 4999



EMERGENCY     1200 - 1399     4000 - 4499



DANGER        1000 - 1199     3400 - 3999



NON-EXISTENCE Less than 1000  Less than 3400





NOTE: The trend of the student's stat graph is always

taken into account per HCO PL 3 October 1970

" Stat Interpretation ".



Revised by

Training & Services Aide



Approved by

L. RON HUBBARD

FOUNDER



for the

BOARDS OF DIRECTOTRS

of the

CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY



BDCS:LRH:RS:rs 

Copyright c 1971, 1972, 1974 

by L. Ron Hubbard 

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 



********



08. HCOPL 27 MAY 65 Processing





HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE



Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



HCO POLICY LETTER OF 27 MAY 1965



Qual & Tech Divs

ALL HATS

HCO Div

ALL HATS



Remimeo 

Sthil Cl VII Course 

Students

Sthil Staff 

Ethics Hats 





PROCESSING



Since 1950 we have had an iron bound rule that we didn't

leave pcs in trouble just to end a session.



For fifteen years we have always continued a session that

found the pc in trouble and I myself have audited a pc for

nine additional hours, all night long in fact, just to get

the pc through.



Newer auditors, not trained in the stern school of running

engrams, must learn this all over again.



It doesn't matter whether the auditor has had a policy on

this or not—one would think that common decency would be

enough as to leave a pc in the middle of a secondary or an

engram and just coolly end the session is pretty cruel.

Some do it because they are startled or afraid and "Rabbit"

(run away by ending the session).



Auditors who end a process or change it when it has turned

on a heavy somatic are likewise ignorant.



WHAT TURNS IT ON WILL TURN IT OFF.



This is the oldest rule in auditing.



Of course people get into secondaries and engrams, go

through misemotion and session because things are running

out. To end off a process or a session because of the clock

is to ignore the real purpose of auditing. The oldest rules

we have are



(a) GET THE PC THROUGH IT.



(b) WHAT TURNS IT ON WILL TURN IT OFF.



(c) THE WAY OUT IS THE WAY THROUGH.



These now are expressed as POLICY.



A falsified auditor's report is also subject to a Court of Ethics.



Any auditor violating this policy letter is liable to an

immediate Court of Ethics convened within 24 hours of the

offence or as soon as is urgently possible.



Auditing at all levels works well when it is done by the book.



The purpose of Ethics is to open the way for and get in Tech.







Then we can do our job.



THERE IS NO MODERN PROCESS THAT WILL NOT WORK WHEN EXACTLY



APPLIED.



Therefore in the eyes of Ethics all auditing failures are

Ethics failures—PTS, Suppressive Persons as pcs, or

non-compliance with tech for auditors.



And the first offence an auditor can commit is ceasing to

audit when he is most needed by his pc.



Hence it is the first most important consideration of

Ethics to prevent such occurrences.



Then we'll make happy pcs, Releases and Clears.



L RON HUBBARD



LRH:nt:rd

Copyright c 1965

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



********





