      HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



    HCO BULLETIN OF 26 DECEMBER 1964



Remimeo

Franchise

Sthil Students

Sthil Co-audit





            SCIENTOL0GY ZERO



          ROUTINE 0A (EXPANDED)



     (Corrections to HCOB 11 Dec. 64,

    PROCESSES, and to HCOB 10 Dec. 64,

         LISTEN-STYLE AUDITING)





An additional command increases the usefulness of this routine. 

It is therefore rewritten as follows:



The auditor makes a list of things people generally can't talk to 

easily. That includes parents, policemen, governments and God. 

But it's a far longer list. The auditor must compile this list 

himself or herself out of session. It may be added to by the 

auditor from time to time. It must never be published as a 

"canned list." Scientology Instructors and Scientology personnel 

should not be listed on it as it leads to upset in sessions.



STEP 1. The auditor chooses one of the subjects off the list and 

uses it in Steps 2 and 3 below until the pc is comfortable about 

it. Subjects from the list can be chosen in sequence or at 

random. A chosen subject is not left until the pc is comfortable 

about it. By this is meant, the pc would not feel disturbed 

talking to the subject chosen.



The auditor does not ask the pc which subject or if it is all

right to choose that subject as the pc at the moment of selection

is not likely to feel comfortable about any of the listed

subjects and so will just reject. No, the auditor just chooses

one and starts on it.



STEP 2. The auditor asks, "If you could talk to ________ (chosen 

subject), what would you talk about?" Pc answers one or more 

things at greater or shorter length.



STEP 3. When the pc seems satisfied the question has been 

answered, the auditor then says, "All right, if you were talking 

to ________ (chosen subject in [1]) about that, what would you 

say, exactly?" The pc is expected to speak as though talking to 

the subject chosen in (1).



STEP 4. The auditor notes whether pc is comfortable about the 

subject chosen in Step 1, yet without asking pc. This is done by 

noting the voice tone or text of what the pc would say. If it is 

shy, diffident, or if it is belligerent or annoyed, the same 

subject is retained for a new go with Steps 2 and 3. If the pc 

seems bright and cheerful, a new subject is chosen from the list 

for a working over with Steps 2 and 3. If the subject in (1) is 

retained, the auditor again does Steps 2 and 3 above over and 

over until the pc is cheerful. A subject chosen in (1) is not 

left until the pc really can respond cheerfully. When this is 

accomplished, a new subject is chosen as Step I and the process 

is continued with Steps 2 and 3 using the new subject.



The whole of Routine 0A is flat when the pc feels far more 

comfortable about talking to specific items and isn't shying off 

from items on the list. It is flat, therefore, when an ability is 

regained on specific items on the list and the list items aren't 

producing big new changes in the pc's communication ability.



          LISTEN-STYLE CO-AUDIT



It is expected that by the time an auditor is permitted to do the 

Zero routines, individual listen style will have been entered 

upon.



Until the class seems able to run individual sessions, old R1C 

can be used by the Auditing Supervisor on a group basis using 

listen-style co-audit until the group has the idea of sessions.



Routines work best on individual listen style. The pc is always 

wondering, in listen-style co-audit, if the Auditing Supervisor 

is listening to him personally. The auditor is not the receipt 

point of the pc's comm in many instances.



Old R1C is the best training mechanism to get auditors to run 

sessions. In this process the Auditing Supervisor just chooses 

something for all the pcs to talk to the auditors about, like a 

dynamic or a common social problem.





L. RON HUBBARD

Founder



LRH.jw.rd.gm



