A Freezone Bible Supporter



Here is a complete Level 0 Academy pack from the 1970s

being posted in 11 parts.  Contents below following the

FZ Bible mission statement.



Much Love,



Tech Lover





**************************************************



FREEZONE BIBLE MISSION STATEMENT



Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology

Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.



The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of

Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the

copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.



They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be

stamped out as heritics.  By their standards, all Christians, 

Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered

to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.



The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings

of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.



We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according

to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.



But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,

the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old 

testament regardless of any Jewish opinion.  



We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion

as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures

without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.



We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do

not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope

that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose

to aid us for that reason.



Thank You,



The FZ Bible Association



**************************************************





******** LEVEL ZERO ACADEMY COURSE PACK ********



Level 0 Academy Course Packs (2) circa 1974 and 1976,

Almost identical [Ed Note: differences noted like this]



Dark blue soft cardboard cover 

8 1/2 by 14 inch 4 hole punched & held together by 

double retainer clips. As issued by Pubs US.



This is complete including book excerpts but does not include

the complete book "Self Analysis" which is also part of the

level (it was posted to the internet last year).



This does not include transcripts of the level 0 tapes, but

we are working on those and will post them eventually.



Note that in the 1970s, HCOBs not written by Ron were converted

to BTBs (Board Technical Bulletins), resulting in the freequent

"reissued as BTB" designation.



Note that bulletins have a "distribution" near the top stating

where they are to be used.  A common distribution is "remimeo"

which means that the orgs may run copies on their mimeo machines.

Another, older, designation is "CenOcon" which means "Central

Orgs Continental".  Others such as "D of T" (director of training)

refer to posts in the Scientology organization.





********



CONTENTS:



part 1



01. BPL   26 JAN 72R  SCIENTOLOGY LEVEL 0 STANDARD ACADEMY CHECKSHEET

02. HCOPL  7 FEB 65 reiss. 15 JUN 70 Keeping Scientology Working

03. HCOPL 17 JUN 70 Technical Degrades

04. HCOB  11 JUN 64 New Student Data

05. HCOB  25 JUN 71R rev. 25 NOV 74 Barriers To Study

06. HCOPL 31 MAY 68 Auditors

07. BPL   17 MAY 71RA r.13 NOV 72 r.10 JUN 74 Study Points and Conditions

08. HCOPL 27 MAY 65 Processing



part 2



09. HCOPL 15 DEC 65 Student's Guide To Acceptable Behavior

10. HCOPL 14 FEB 65 Safeguarding Technology

11. HCOB  27 SEP 66 The Anti-Social Personality

12. HCOPL 22 NOV 67 Rev. 18 JUL 70 Out Tech

13. HCOPL  8 JUN 70 Student Auditing

14. BPL   25 JUN 70RA Expanded Lower Grades

15. HCOB  25 SEP 71RA rev 4 APR 74 Tone Scale In Full

16. BTB   20 JUL 74 Basic Auditing Drills

17. HCOPL 14 OCT 68R rev 1 JAN 76 The Auditor's Code



part 3



18. BTB    6 NOV 72R rev 25 JUL 74 Admin 14R The Worksheets

19. BTB    6 NOV 72R rev 27 AUG 74 Admin 13R The Auditor Report Form

20. BTB    6 NOV 72R rev 28 JUL 74 Admin 12R The Summary Report Form

21. BTB   20 JUN 70 reiss 21 JUL 74 Summary Report

22. BTB    6 NOV 72RA rev 20 NOV 74 Admin 11RA The Exam Report

23. HCOPL  8 MAR 71 Examiner's Form

24. BTB    5 NOV 72R rev 9 SEP 74 Admin 7R The Folder Summary

25. BTB   24 APR 69R rev 8 SEP 74 Preclear Assessment Sheet

26. HCOPL 23 APR 68 Parent or Guardian Assent Forms

27. HCOB  16 AUG 71 Training Drills Modernized



part 4



28. HCOB  24 OCT 71 False TA

29. HCOB  24 OCT 71 False TA Addition 

30. HCOB  15 FEB 72 False TA Addition 2

31. HCOB  18 FEB 72 False TA Addition 3

32. HCOB  29 FEB 72R rev 23 NOV 73 False TA Checklist

33. HCOB  23 NOV 73 Dry and Wet Hands Make False TA

34. HCOB  21 OCT 68 Floating Needle

35. HCOB  11 FEB 66 Free Needles, How To Get Them On a PC

36. HCOB  21 SEP 66 ARC Break Needle

37. HCOB  20 FEB 70 Floating Needles and End Phenomena

38. HCOB   8 OCT 70 C/S Ser 20 Persistent F/N

39. HCOB  21 MAR 74 End Phenomena

40. HCOB  14 MAR 71R r. 25 JUL 73 F/N Everything

41. HCOB  14 OCT 68 Meter Position

42. BTB   14 JAN 63 Rings Causing "Rock Slams"

43. HCOB  18 MAR 74 E-Meter Sensitivity Errors

44. BTB   16 JUN 71R r. 22 JUL 74 Advanced E-Meter Drills

45. HCOB  11 MAY 69 Meter Trim Check

46. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 11 Metering

47. HCOB  10 DEC 65 E-Meter Drill Coaching



part 5



48. HCOB   7 APR 64 Q And A

49. HCOB   3 AUG 65 Auditing Goofs Blowdown Interruption

50. HCOB   5 FEB 66 Letting The PC Itsa

51. HCOB   7 MAY 69 The Five GAEs

52. HCOB  17 MAY 69 TRs and Dirty Needles

53. BTB    4 JUL 69 r. 6 JUL 74 Auditing of OT 3 Preclears

54. BTB   17 JUL 69 r. 28 JUN 74 Flagrant Auditing Errors

55. HCOB  29 JUL 64 Good Indicators At Lower Levels

56. BTB   26 APR 69 r. 7 JUL 64 Bad Indicators

57. HCOPL  4 APR 72 rev. 7 APR 72 Ethics And Study Tech

58. HCOB  14 NOV 65 Clearing Commands

59. BTB    2 MAY 72R r. 10 JUN 74 Clearing Commands

60. BTB   18 NOV 68R r. 9 JUN 74 Model Session

61. HCOB  12 AUG 69 Flying Ruds

62. HCOB  23 AUG 71 (24 May 70 rev) Auditors Rights

63. HCOB   6 NOV 64 Styles of Auditing



part 6



64. HCOB  30 APR 71 Auditing Comm Cycle

65. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 2R The Two Parts Of Auditing

66. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 3 Three Important Comm Lines

67. HCOB  23 MAY 71R aud ser 4R Comm Cycles Within the Auditing Cycle

68. HCOB  23 MAY 71R aud ser 5R The Comm Cycles In Auditing



part 7



69. HCOB  12 JAN 59 Tone of Voice - Acknowledgement

70. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 6 Auditor Failure To Understand

71. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 7 Premature Acknowledgements

72. HCOPL  1 JUL 65 Comm Cycle Additives

73. HCOB  29 SEP 65 Cyclical and Non-Cyclical Processes

74. HCOB  17 MAR 74 TWC, Using Wrong Questions

75. BOOK  Dianetics 55 Chapter 12 The 6 Basic Processes



part 8



76. HCOB  16 FEB 59 Staff Auditor's Conference



part 9



77. HCOB  20 OCT 59 An Experimental Process

78. HCOB  16 FEB 59 HGC Processes for those trained in Engram Running

79. HCOB   8 APR 58 A Pair Of Processes

80. HCOB   9 MAR 60 Expansion of OT-3A Procedure, Step Two

81. HCOB  20 APR 60 Processes

82. HCOB  27 SEP 68 ARC Straight Wire

83. BTB    9 OCT 71RA r. 28 JUN 74 ARC Straightwire Drills

84. BTB   15 NOV 76 ARC Straightwire Quads

85. BOOK  Creation of Human Ability R2-31

86. PAB    8 JUL 55 PAB 56 Axiom 51 and Comm Processing



part 10



87. PAB   18 JUN 55 PAB 54 Reality Level of Preclear

88. HCOB  17 MAR 60 Standardized Sessions

89. HCOB   4 MAY 59 An Affinity Process

90. HCOB   2 MAR 61 New Pre-Hav Command

91. HCOB  25 SEP 59 HAS Co-Audit

92. HCOB  21 JUL 59 HGC Allowed Processes

93. BOOK   Creation of Human Ability R2-60

94. HCOB  13 OCT 59 D.E.I. Expanded Scale

95. HCOB   7 MAY 59 New Process Theory

96. BOOK   Scn 8-8008 6 Levels of Processing Issue 5

97. HCOB  11 DEC 64 Scientology 0 Processes

98. HCOB  26 DEC 64 Routine 0-A Expanded



part 11



99. BTB    9 OCT 71RA r. 29 JUL 74 Level 0 Drills

100. BTB  15 NOV 76 Grade Zero Processes - Quads



******** 



77. HCOB  20 OCT 59 An Experimental Process





HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE



Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



HCO BULLETIN OF 20 OCTOBER AD9



HCO Secs



Franchise Holders



D of P Central Orgs



AN EXPERIMENTAL PROCESS



Recall Processes have always worked well. But it has been

hard to get the most fundamental processes that would reach

the lowest cases.



Here are some Recall Processes that work way down South of

the Auks:



COMM RECALL PROCESS:



"Recall a Communication"





KNOW MYSTERY RECALL PROCESSES:



"Recall an Unconsciousness"



"Recall Waiting"



"Recall a Mystery"



"Recall Sex"



"Recall Eating" (or a variation



"Recall Food")



"Recall a Symbol"



"Recall Thinking"



"Recall an Effort"



"Recall an Emotion"



"Recall Looking"



"Recall Knowing"



"Recall Not-Knowing"





These are very good, especially on bad off cases. They all work.



When the lowest seems flat one can go to one above.

Probably there is an E-Meter tellingness that denotes

flatness. I'm working on this and will have the gen soon.



The earliest experiments of this were on "Recall a Mystery"

as a method of raising IQ and the pc was spouting poetry

he'd "forgotten".



There are many possible versions of these simplicities as

one can run them on terminals and significances. Also,

remember that these things (Recall Processes) take the pc

out of PT and put him back in. You stop one with the PC

back in PT. The Comm bridge to be used on this process is:

"When you next get an answer close to present time we will

end this process if it is all right with you." Then don't

go on for an hour or two, catch it with 8 or 10 commands by

seeing the pc is doing a short cycle at the time and has

started back up.



"Recall Exhaustion" is a simple, very effective version of

a work process.



"Recall Creating" is a good way, apparently, to mop up Step

6 flubs.



Therefore you can use these processes in the HGC or you

can, when it is okayed, use them in training. These are

individual processes and not co-audit. As a note on

co-audit, the process, the only basic affinity process,

"What would you like to confront," could cut your co-audit

attendance losses. It is now allowed, having been carefully

tested. Man, do they get interested in cases and hence into 

session. This is a fine individual process for pcs that 

"have no reality on pictures".





L. RON HUBBARD



LRH :js.rd

Copyright c 1959

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED





******** 



78. HCOB  16 FEB 59 HGC Processes for those trained in Engram Running





HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

WASHINGTON, D.C.



HCO BULLETIN OF 16 FEBRUARY 1959



HGC PROCESSES FOR THOSE TRAINED IN ENGRAM RUNNING

OR TRAINED IN THESE PROCESSES





STARTING A CASE: BEGIN EVERY SESSION AS FOLLOWS WITH THESE

RUDIMENTS.



USE RUDIMENTS. FIND THE AUDITOR, FIND THE PC, FIND

THE AUDITING ROOM.



ESTABLISH A GOAL FOR THE SESSION. ASK FOR PRESENT

TIME PROBLEM.





PRESENT TIME PROBLEM:



If PTP exists then run it as follows and in no other way.

Do not yak around about it. Just ask if there is one, see

if one registers on the meter. On the PT PROBLEM THAT

REGISTERS ON THE METER (not some other one) do the following.



Ask for and write down all the persons connected with this

problem. That problem includes the preclear. On each of

these persons, one after the other, beginning with the one

most real to the pc, run this:



"Think of something you have done to (selected person)."

"Think of something you have withheld from (selected person)."



These commands are run one after the other until the

selected person chosen is somewhat flat. (Pc begins to

repeat things he has recalled before.)



Do this to each person involved in the problem.



PT PROBLEMS WERE CUT OUT OF HGC BECAUSE AUDITORS BURNED UP

HALF AN INTENSIVE ON THEM. A PT PROBLEM NEVER REQUIRES MORE THAN A

COUPLE OF HOURS TO FLATTEN. NO "WHEN" IS USED WITH PT PROBLEM BY

SELECTED PERSONS.



USE RUDIMENTS AND CHECK PT PROBLEM EACH SESSION AND HANDLE

AS ABOVE.





DYNAMIC STRAIGHT WIRE:



Do a survey, one time on the pc, not every session, to

discover any errors in their dynamics. This is done with an

E-Meter. On pcs not familiar with Sci. terms use the

following words: Self, sex, family, children, groups,

mankind, the animal kingdom, birds, beasts, fish,

vegetables, trees, growing things, matter, energy, space,

time, spirits, souls, gods, God.



Assess with this question only, "Tell me something that

would represent (each of the above, one after the other)."

When one changes the pattern of the needle action or when

it is definitely balmy, write it down. When list is

completed, take those items written down and run: "Think of

something you have done to (selected terminal you wrote

down)." "Think of something you have withheld from

(selected terminal, same one)." Run these questions on

each, one after the other, until pc seems flat.



IF NO DAFFY TERMINALS ARE FOUND ON SURVEY, SURVEY IT ALL AGAIN.

IF NONE ARE FOUND THIS SECOND TIME, SKIP THIS PROCESS.

DO THIS ONLY ONCE PER AUDITOR PER PC.





PAST AND FUTURE EXPERIENCE:



This process goes rapidly into engrams but can be continued

even if engrams are contacted.



Run these two questions one after the other, one time per each.



"What part of your life would you be willing to re-experience?"



"What part of the future would you be willing to experience?"



KEEP AN ACCURATE RECORD OF ANY ENGRAMS CONTACTED. WHEN

ENGRAMS PERSIST IN THE PC'S VIEW, CAREFULLY SPOT THEM IN TIME 

FOR HIM.





ENGRAM RUNNING:



Find the engram necessary to resolve the case. ONCE YOU

HAVE CHOSEN IT AND HAVE BEGUN TO RUN IT, BE SURE YOU HAVE

THE MOTIVATOR AND THE OVERT AND THEN DO NOT DO NOT DO NOT 

DO NOT DEPART FROM THAT INCIDENT TO RUN ANOTHER THAT 

"DROPS BETTER" OR COMES UP. IN OTHER WORDS ONCE

YOU HAVE FOUND AN INCIDENT STAY ON IT UNTIL IT IS FLAT.





NOT-IS STRAIGHT WIRE:



When you have flattened an engram thoroughly with all five

commands gone over twice, run Not-Is Straight Wire between

incidents. In other words, flatten an engram, then run

Not-Is Straight Wire, get that a bit flat and locate and

run the next incident.



Selected Person Overt Withhold, and General Overt and

Withhold can be run on a pc only if they are biting. This

is also true of Not-Is Straight Wire.



L. RON HUBBARD



LRH:-.rd

Copyright c 1959

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



********



79. HCOB   8 APR 58 A Pair Of Processes





HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE



WASHINGTON, D.C.



HCO BULLETIN OF 8 APRIL AD 8



Issue II



A PAIR OF PROCESSES



Now and then I overhaul some old process once in use and

see what can be done to make it work.



Op Pro by Dup and Forgetting are a pair that recently

showed up as having a possible specific value—i.e. to

create a specific effect upon a specific difficulty.



Evidently Admiration and Critical are a dichotomy. Maxine

Kozak suggests that Duplication is Admiration. From this I

looked over Critical on the APA (OCA) profile and saw that

the low critical might be influenced by Op Pro by Dup. A

test should be made of this.



The other process is less nebulous in action. The specific

for a bad memory is Forgetting run in Brackets. You will

ordinarily find an automaticity of forgetting when you ask

"Recall something you wouldn't mind other people

forgetting." This is a "bad memory". Nothing like a good

conscience to retain a good memory.



The commands of Forgetting would be a 6-way bracket.



Recall (or think of) something you wouldn't mind



1. Forgetting yourself



2. Another person forgetting



3. Forgetting about another



4. Another forgetting about you



5. Other people forgetting



6. Another person forgetting about another person.



Each command is cleared. The commands are run in sequence

rather than repetition.



This is a low scale process. Goes lower than "Not know" but

graduates into it.



This is a basic on unknowns and fields of whatever kind.



L. RON HUBBARD

LRH:bt.cden

Copyright c 1958

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



[Ed Note: This bulletin was also reproduced verbatim in

PAB 143]





******** 



80. HCOB   9 MAR 60 Expansion of OT-3A Procedure, Step Two





HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE



Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



HCO BULLETIN OF 9 MARCH 1960



Fran Hldrs

Central Orgs





EXPANSION OF OT-3A PROCEDURE, STEP TWO



HGC ALLOWED PROCESSES



Step Two of OT-3A Procedure is as follows:



Run Cause ARC Straight Wire to give pc a win on getting

audited. Once each over and over. End process only with pc

in present time on cycle.



"Recall communicating to someone"



"Recall a time you felt affinity for someone"



"Recall something that is really real to you"



Now people do have time tracks, the time span of the

individual from beingness to present time on which lies the

sequence of events of his total existence. And when the

preclear is in session and is being run on a recall type

process, he, with his attention, goes up and down this time

track. He may recall things only from this life or he may

recall things from his whole past track; but however that

may be, his attention cycles from early on the track to

present time or from present time to early on the track to

present time. This is known as the cycle aspect of recall

type processes. In ending such a process, it is of utmost

importance that the auditor end it with the preclear in

present time on the cycle. The auditor wants to watch

ending the process when the preclear has not made a smooth

cycle into present time, but has made a big jump from way

back in the past to present time. In such a case, the

preclear has really bounced out of the past incident into

present time, and it is only an apparency that the preclear

is in present time.



So when ending such a process, the auditor must exert

caution to be certain the preclear is in present time.

Being left with one's attention back on the track is not a

comfortable sensation and sometimes can be quite painful,

despite any justification offered by an auditor who himself

has no reality on the time track, and I hope there are no

such auditors.



With Cause ARC Straight Wire, the auditor must forget his

fastidiousness about ending the process precisely so on the

last command, "Recall something that is really real to

you." He ends the process, no matter on what command of

Cause ARC Straight Wire, when the preclear's attention has

come into or close to present time, close to present time

being the last day or two.



In ending such a process the communication bridge used is

as follows: "The next time you come close to present time I

am going to end this process." He continues to give the

commands using the question, "When was that?", after each

answer the preclear gives and before the acknowledgement.

When the preclear gives an answer close to present time, he

says, "That was the last command of that process; end of

process." Bang. With processes that cycle, there can be no

communication bridges like, "If it's alright with you in a

few more commands I am going to end this process." It could

take fifty more commands until the preclear is close to

present time; and by that time, the preclear has entirely

forgotten that there ever was any intention on the

auditor's part to end the process as it seems to him that

the auditor must have changed his mind and decided to run

the process longer than a few commands.



An auditor should not get upset with a preclear when the

auditor, in an effort to get the preclear to give an answer

right in present time, starts the preclear back down the

time track again. Remember it is the auditor who calls the shot, 

and if he misses, then he had better learn to gage it a bit

better. A good auditor allows himself time in which to

properly end a process.



Now two further cyclic processes which can be seen under

Step Two of OT-3A are: 1. "What would it be all right for

you to make forgotten?"



2. "What would you permit to have happen again?"



These are called Cause Elementary Straight Wire and are two

separate processes which are not to be run alternately.



The first process puts the preclear at cause over

forgetting, and the second process rehabilitates the

preclear's ability to duplicate. These are both terrific

processes in turning on recall in the preclear. All

processes under Step Two are unlimited, with the "make

forgotten" one only slightly less unlimited as it has a bit

of a tendency to run down havingness.



Havingness, however, should be checked upon in each session

and run as needed.



The auditor should not consider Step Two of OT-3A lightly.

These processes are, in reality, very potent and will

certainly do more for CCH-step cases than anything we have

had before. An example of this is how preclears broke

through from psychosis to neurosis to sanity with the

simplified version of ARC Straight Wire as given in the

original Self Analysis. So use these processes and win faster.



Note: On second thoughts for purposes of differentiation,

the first process, "What would it be all right for you to

make forgotten?", should be termed Cause Elementary

Straight Wire; and the second process, "What would you

permit to have happen again?", shall be called Duplication

Straight Wire. These two processes were first used in early

Advanced Clinical Courses in Phoenix and were called at

that time "Elementary Straightwire". The commands of

"Elementary Straightwire" as given in Dianetics 1955 were:

"Give me something you wouldn't mind remembering" and "Give

me something you wouldn't mind forgetting". As the ability

to recall depends upon the mechanisms of forgetting and

remembering (the ability to duplicate) you can easily

understand the importance of these in Step Two of OT-3A.



L. RON HUBBARD



LRH:js.rd

Copyright © 1960

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED





********



81. HCOB  20 APR 60 Processes



[Ed. Note: This was an HCOB and is on the checksheet but it was

not by Ron and therefore is not in the Tech volumes.  It is

present in the 1974 pack but missing from the 1976 one.]



HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



HCO BULLETIN OF APRIL 20, 1960



CenO.

Franchise Holders



PROCESSES



Dick Halpern, in charge of the First South African ACC in

Johannesburg, has sent a dispatch to Ron in which he states

that Cause Elementary Straight Wire is most suitable for

raising low tone arms, while Duplication Straight Wire is

most suitable for lowering high tone arm.  Dick has tested

this on ACC students, and found the results excellent.



The command of Cause Elementary Straight Wire is "What

would it be all right for you to make forgotten?"



The command of Duplication Straight Wire is: "What would

you permit to have happen again?"



Issued by:- PETER HEMERY

HCO Secretary WW



for L. RON HUBBARD



LRH:js:mb

Copyright c. 1960

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED





********



82. HCOB  27 SEP 68 ARC Straight Wire





HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



HCO BULLETIN OF 27 SEPTEMBER 1968

Issue II



Remimeo

All Dianetic

Courses





ARC STRAIGHT WIRE



(Corrects HCO B 30 June 1962 and also

in the HDA Course book. Corrects p. 102

[soft-cover edition] of Self Analysis.)

(Paste over HDA Course page 15.)

(Corrects earlier HCO B of same date & title.)





The correct commands for ARC Straight Wire, as researched

and as successful in test in cracking even neurotic cases,

with one command added to modernize it, were and are:



Recall a time that was really real to you.



Recall a time you were in good communication with someone.



Recall a time you really felt affinity for someone.



Recall a time you knew you understood something.



Run ONLY on a Meter.



Run ONLY to Floating Needle and NOT beyond. (Don't abruptly

cut pc's Comm.) 



A true fact is that ARC always must precede

an ARC Break.



Also ARC = Understanding and Time.



A = Space and the willingness to occupy the same space of.



R = Mass or agreement.



C = Energy or Recognition.





L. RON HUBBARD

Founder



LRH:jp.ei.rd

Copyright c 1968

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED





******** 



83. BTB   9 OCT 71RA r. 28 JUN 74 ARC Straightwire Drills





B O A R D T E C H N I C A L B U L L E T I N



9 OCTOBER 1971 RA

REVISED 8 AUGUST 1973

REVISED & REISSUED 28 JUNE 1974 AS BTB

( REVISION IN ITALICS )



Remimeo 

Level 0 

Chksht

Level VI 

Chksht 



CANCELS

HCO BULLETIN OF 9 OCTOBER 1971 R

SAME TITLE





Auditor Drills Series No. 1RA





ARC STRAIGHTWIRE DRILLS





WITH PARTICULAR EMPHASIS ON CORRECT APPLICATION OF SELF

ANALYSIS PROCESSING.



PURPOSE: To improve the quality of auditing by

familiarizing Auditors with the exact procedure of each

auditing action through the use of drills.



HOW TO USE: These drills are in order by levels . The first

number indicates the level taught on. Those that begin with

TR 00 - ( drill No . ) are Level Zero Drills . The double

zero is to differentiate the drills from TR 0-4.

Unbullbaited drills end in odd numbers; and bullbaited end

in even numbers.



Most drills are done within the basic formats as laid out.

Any that don't will be fully covered in the specific drills

themselves.



Simply start with the first actions and work through the

drills in the order given as it's the same order as the ARC

ST. Wire Expanded Grade BTB 4 Jan 72 RA. Each drill is done

until you know you can do it flawlessly, even while being

bullbaited.



If a student has trouble on a drill, locate whether the

student has a misunderstood or has a skipped gradient and

handle either or both with standard Study Tech. This can

lead back to outnesses on basics such as TRs, codes or

scales. Whatever it is, find out why and handle.



NOTE: If coach upset occurs because of restimulation, fruit

words should be inserted in the place of the process Key

Words, for bullbaited drills only.





FORMAT FOR UNBULLBAITED DRILLS



NAME: Auditing on a doll unbullbaited.



COMMANDS: As for each separate process.



PURPOSE: To train the student to be able to coordinate and

apply the commands and procedures of each separate auditing

action with the actual doingness of auditing.



POSITION: Student seated at a table with E-Meter,

worksheets and auditing forms as needed.



In the chair opposite the student is a doll occupying the

position of the PC. (During drill the coach is seated or

standing beside the Auditor. He does not take the position

of the doll.) TRAINING STRESS: This drill is coached. The

student sets up the E-Meter and worksheets exactly as in a

session - as follows:



1. Set up E-Meter as for E-Meter drills.



2. Set up shield to prevent TA and admin being seen by PC (doll).



3. Have extra pens under the E-Meter.



4. Have C/S face down between the bottom of the E-Meter and

the table.



5. Have W/S and Lists readily available in sequence

required for the session.



Auditor starts the session and runs a standard session with

the particular auditing action being taken up on the doll,

keeping full session admin and using all standard

procedures of the auditing action. Coach watches drill and

points out any outnesses noted giving a"that's it"and a

re-start. Outnesses should be handled one at a time until

none exist..



The drill is done on a steeper and steeper gradient until

the student can very quickly do the action correctly.



The drill is passed when the student can do the drill

flawlessly with good TRs 0-4, correct procedure and

commands, without comm lags or confusion; ie. flawlessly!





FORMAT TO BE USED FOR BULLBAITED DRILLS



NAME: Auditing _____________ Bullbaited.



COMMANDS: As for each separate auditing action.



PURPOSE: To train the student to be able to coordinate and

apply the commands and procedures of each separate auditing

action in a drill similar to a real auditing session and

thereby become flawless in applying it.



POSITION: Student seated at a table with E-Meter and

Auditor forms, as needed. In the chair opposite the Auditor

is a doll as PC. Coach sits beside doll and is the

bullbaiter and gives answers as PC, not about his own case.



TRAINING STRESS: The drill is the same as for auditing on a

doll except that the "PC"coach bullbaits the student

Auditor using "fruit"answers during the session in an

attempt to throw the student off session. On any list, the

coach squeezes the cans to simulate reads. He still uses

"fruit"answers (six apples, blue pears) when asked to

speak, but as the student Auditor reads off the list items

(eg. L3RF) he squeezes the cans for reads.



When bullbaiting an auditing action the coach should THROW

IN VARIOUS SIGNS OF PC OUT OF SESSIONNESS. (Per HCOB on

Good Indicators and BTB on Bad Indicators.) The student 

Auditor must:



1. Obnose the out of sessionness.



2. Align this to the process run.



3. Handle.



An example is, on a Listing and Nulling procedure an out of

sessionness is observed, the Auditor queries and follows

through with an L4BRA at once. (An L4BRA is a repair list.)

The PC bullbaiter can throw in situations, originate

troubles or gains, be tricky, etc. But he must never lose

sight of HCOB 24 May 1968 "Coaching", especially the second

paragraph -" Coach with reality".



Once the coach throws out a situation, etc. he must allow

the student Auditor to carry it out, and handle the

situation before the coach calls a new situation.



Stress is on training the student Auditor to have his TRs 0

- 4 in on the bullbaiter.



The coach (bullbaiter) does the "start", flunking or

"That's it". Flunks are given for any improper commands,

procedure, comm lags, break in TRs or improper session admin.



Each drill is to be done thoroughly, building up the speed

of Auditor commands and actions. ("It's the number of

auditing commands per unit of auditing time which makes

gains in a session." LRH)



When the student Auditor has done these steps to his

satisfaction, he gets a starrate checkout. The drill is

passed when the student can do the drill flawlessly with

excellent TRs 0 -4, correct procedure and commands, without

comm lags or confusion. These are the drills that train the

student Auditor to handle all the elements in a session, so

be exact and be real.



NOTE: Clearing of commands is per BTB 2 May 72R and other

Bulletins and PLs on the subject (ie. clearing each word of

command backwards).





TR 00-1 "REMEMBER SOMETHING" UNBULLBAITED.



TR 00-2 "REMEMBER SOMETHING" BULLBAITED.



Ref. Dianetics ‘55



STEPS:



1. R- factor to PC that you are going to run ARC

Straightwire Expanded processes. Clear "ARC", "What 

does ARC mean to you?" Then clear the words 

"Straightwire and expanded" in the same way. Use a 

Scientology and regular dictionary do clear up

any the PC doesn't know or has confusion on. Make sure the

PC understands what is going to happen and is happy to be

run on the processes, and that a good Auditor - PC- Auditor

Comm Cycle is in.



2. Tell the PC "The first process of ARC SW Expanded is a

repetitive process." Clear the word "repetitive"so that the

PC understands how the process is to be run. Tell the PC

that when he has carried out the auditing command he should

tell you what he recalled or thought of, not just an answer

like "yes"to the command (ref. HCOB 30 June 62). This

applies to all processes of this level and PC must

understand this.



3. Clear the command with the PC - "What is the definition

of the word ___________ ?" Clear the word "something"first

- then the word "remember".



4. Run the process repetitively, same command over and

over, to F/N Cog VGIs.





TR 00-3 "RECALL A TIME" UNBULLBAITED



TR 00-4 "RECALL A TIME" BULLBAITED



Ref: Staff Auditors Conference of 18 Feb 59



STEPS:



l. R-factor - "We are going to run an ARC SW process. This

is a repetitive process." 2. Clear the command - "What is

the definition of the word __________ ?" clear "Time, A,

Recall" in that order.



Be sure to use the Scientology Dictionary definition of"recall".



3. Run the process repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs.







TR 00-5 COMM RECALL PROCESS UNBULLBAITED.



TR 00-6 COMM RECALL PROCESS BULLBAITED.



Ref: HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process



STEPS:



1. R- factor - "We are going to run a process called Comm

Recall Process. "Make sure PC understands that "Comm" is

short for "Communication". Tell PC - "This is a repetitive

process."



2. Clear the command word by word backwards as in the above drills.



3 . Run the process command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs .





TR 00-7 THE ONLY BASIC AFFINITY PROCESS UNBULLBAITED



TR 00-8 THE ONLY BASIC AFFINITY PROCESS BULLBAITED



Ref: HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process



STEPS:



1. R-factor - "We are going to run a process called The

Only Basic Affinity Process." 2. Tell PC "This process has

three commands, each is run separately in a repetitive manner."



3. Clear the first command as in the earlier drills.



4. Run the first process command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs.



5. R-factor - "Now we'll run the second command."



6. Clear the second command as in the earlier drills.



7. Run the second command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs.



8. R-factor - "Now we'll run the third command."



9. Clear the third command as in the earlier drills.



10. Run the third command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs.





TR 00-9  EXHAUSTION     UNBULLBAITED

TR 00-10 EXHAUSTION     BULLBAITED



Ref: HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process



STEPS:



1. R-factor - "We are going to run a process called

'Exhaustion'.  This is a repetitive process with one

command.



2. Clear the command as in the earlier drills.



3. Run the process command repetititvely to F/N Cog VGIs.





TR 00-11 PAST AND FUTURE EXPERIENCE UNBULLBAITED



TR 00-12 PAST AND FUTURE EXPERIENCE BULLBAITED



Ref: HCOB 16 Feb 59 HGC Processes for those trained in

engram running or trained in these processes.



STEPS:



1. R- factor - "We are going to run a process called "Past

and Future Experience".



This process has two commands which are run alternately,

one after the other, over and over.



2. Clear the first command as in earlier drills. Then clear

the second command.



3. Run the process commands alternately (1-2-1-2, etc. )

over and over until the PC has F/N Cog VGIs.





TR 00-13 FORGETTING - 6 WAY BRACKET UNBULLBAITED



TR 00-14 FORGETTING - 6 WAY BRACKET BULLBAITED



Ref: HCOB 8 April 58 A Pair of Processes



PAB 143



STEPS:



1 . R-factor - "We are going to run a process called

'Forgetting'. It has six commands, each of which is run by

itself repetitively."



2. Clear the first command as in earlier drills. PC must

understand that he is to recall when he himself forgot

something.



3. Run the first command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs .



4. R-factor. "Now we'll run the second command."



5. Clear the second command.



6. Run the second command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs.



7. Repeat steps 4 - 7 on each command 3 through 6 in turn 

(R - factor each time refers to "third command", "fourth

command", etc.)





TR 00-15 CAUSE ELEMENTARY STRAIGHTWIRE UNBULLBAITED



TR 00-16 CAUSE ELEMENTARY STRAIGHTWIRE BULLBAITED



Ref: HCOB 9 Mar 60 Expansion of OT-3A Procedure, step two

HGC allowed processes.



HCOB 20 April 60 Processes.



STEPS:



1. R - factor - "We are going to run a process called

'Cause Elementary Straightwire'. Clear the words "Cause" 

and "Elementary". This process has three commands; each is 

run by itself repetitively. 



2 . Clear the first command.



3. Run the first command of the process repetitively to F/N

Cog VGIs.



4. R-factor "Now we are going to run the second command."



5. Clear the second command.



6. Run the second command of the process repetitively to

F/N Cog VGIs.



7. R - factor - "Now we are going to run the third command."



8. Clear the third command.



9. Run the third command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs.





TR 00-17 DUPLICATION STRAIGHTWIRE UNBULLBAITED



TR 00-18 DUPLICATION STRAIGHTWIRE BULLBAITED



Ref: HCOB 9 Mar 60 Expansion of OT-3A Procedure, step two

HGC Allowed



Processes.



STEPS:



1. R-factor - "We are going to run a process called

‘Duplication Straightwire'." Clear the word "Duplication"

with the PC.



"This process has three commands , each run by itself

repetitively."



2. Clear the first command.



3. Run the first command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs.



4. R - factor "Now we are going to run the second command."



5. Clear the second command.



6. Run the second command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs.



7. R - Factor "Now we are going to run the third command."



8. Clear the third command.



9. Run the third command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs.





TR 00-19 KNOW TO MYSTERY RECALL PROCESS UNBULLBAITED



TR 00-20 KNOW TO MYSTERY RECALL PROCESS BULLBAITED



Ref: HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process



Scn 0-8 Expanded Know to Mystery Scale



STEPS:



1. R- factor "We are going to run the ‘Know to Mystery

Recall Process'. This process is used with a scale called

the Know to Mystery Scale. It has a number of commands,

each of which is run by itself repetitively."



2. Clear the first command.



3. Run the first command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs.



4. R- factor - "Now we are going to run the second command."



5. Clear the second command.



6. Run the second command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs.



7. Do steps 4 - 6 on each command in turn 3 through 13 ( R

- factor on each matches the number of the command"third

command","fourth command", etc. Also that command is the

one cleared and then run).





TR 00-21 SELF ANALYSIS LISTS UNBULLBAITED



TR 00-22 SELF ANALYSIS LISTS BULLBAITED



Ref: Book - Self Analysis

PAB 46



R-FACTOR TO AUDITOR: It is very important that the Auditor

have a fuIl understanding of the purpose and technique of

Self Analysis processing. This data is contained in the

book and must be thoroughly studied with particular

attention to the "Processing Section." 



THESE PROCESSES PREPARE THE PC'S CASE FOR AUDITING ON DIANETICS. 

In running these lists the Auditor directs the PC to moments

action took place, not when somebody said it took place or

merely the concept that it did happen. YOU GET THE ACTUAL

PHYSICAL OCCURRENCE. Each time you ask the PC to recall an

incident of a certain kind you then ask, after he recalls

it, to pay attention to a certain sense channel which was

present during the time he experienced it. The circular

disc is provided for the purpose of directing which sense

to pay particular attention to. You place the disc over the

question you are going to ask and the sense perception at

the top is asked for. When you go to the next list question

you move the disc over it and rotate it one sense

counter-clock- wise so that you have a new sense to ask for.



When you go to a new page of questions in the book you turn

over the disc so that you have a new set of senses to ask

for. If you don't have a disc use the same senses as listed

on the bottom of each page and tick them off one after the

other as you go along.



The Auditor should make sure that the PC speaks aloud the

things he is recalling. The preclear's nod or "yes" to

signify that he has recalled something is insufficient.

Have him select an actual moment in his life called for by

the question. Try to get him to re-sense that moment with

the perceptic called for on the disc.



If the PC finds it extremely difficult to recall any one

question in these lists, simply pass over it and go to the

next question. You can go over a list more than once if the

PC does not reach EP the first time through.



STEPS:



1. R- factor to PC - "We are now going to run the Self

Analysis lists from the book Self Analysis. I will be

asking you to recall specific incidents in your life. Try

to recall the moment it actually occurred, not just the

concept that it did occur. When you have recalled it tell

me what it is. Then I will ask you to pay particular

attention to a certain sense perception in the incident.

Try to re-sense that moment with the perceptic called for."



2. Clear the sense perceptics with the PC.



Clear "emotion"as that emotion the PC felt at the time of

the incident. Clear "loudness" as the loudness of the

various sounds in the incident.



Clear "body position" as the position of his own body at

the time the incident occurred.



Clear "sound" as those sounds in the incident.



Clear "weight" as the heaviness of the things , including

the pull of gravity on the PC and the weight of anything he

may actually be supporting in the incident such as his

clothes, a ball or and other thing which he is actually

holding at the time the incident occurred.



Clear "personal motion" as the motion which the PC himself

was undertaking at the time the incident occurred.



Clear "sight" as what the PC actually saw at the time the

incident was taking place.



Clear "smell" as what odors were present during the scene

he is recalling.



Clear "touch" as anything he was actually touching at the

time with the sensation of touch including pressure.



Clear "colour" as the actual colour contained in the scene

called for.



Clear "tone" as the quality of the sound present when the

scene occurred.



Clear "external motion" as the motion of other people or

objects or of energy.



3. Clear the commands for List 1, clearing each word of the

basic question backwards.



"What is the definition of the word ____________?"



Clear - "Can you recall a time when _____________ ?"



"Can you recall another time when ____________ ?"



"Can you recall the earliest time when ____________ ?"



4. R- factor to PC "We will clear the additional words to

each list question as we go along."



5. To PC - "This is the process."



6. Place the disk over the first question.



7. Clear the first question - "What is the definition of

the word _________ ?" Clear "happy" and "were". "You" has

already been cleared so needn't be again. In clearing the

list questions the words that are repeated need only be

cleared the first time they come up.



8. Ask PC - "Can you recall a time when you were happy?"



9. PC answers and Auditor acknowledges. If PC only nods or

says "yes"Auditor asks "What was it?", gets the answer and

acknowledges PC.



10. Auditor says "Try to see what you saw in the incident."

( Or whatever perceptic you start with. )



11. PC indicates he has , Auditor acks and then asks -

"What did you ‘see' at that time?" 12. PC answers and

auditor acks.



13. Auditor asks PC - "Can you recall another time when you

were happy ?" 14. PC answers and auditor acks and then says

- "Try to ‘see' what you saw in the incident."



15. PC indicates that he has, Auditor acks and then asks

"What did you ‘see' at that time?" 



16. PC answers and Auditor acks.



17. Auditor asks PC - "Can you recall the earliest time

when you were happy?" 18. PC answers and Auditor acks and

then says - "Try to 'see' what you saw in the incident."



19. PC indicates he has, auditor acks and then asks "What

did you ‘see' at that time?" 



20. PC answers and auditor acks.



21. Auditor moves the disc down to question 2 and rotates

the disc one perceptic counter - clockwise.



22. Clear the new words that are in question No.2 - "What

is the definition of _______?" (Clear - something, constructing, 

finished, just, had).



23. Auditor asks PC - "Can you recall a time when you had

just finished constructing something?"



24. PC answers by telling auditor what it is and auditor acks.



25. Auditor says to PC - "Recall the odors that you smelled

in the incident." 



26. PC indicates he has, Auditor acks and then asks - "What 

odors did you smell at that time?"



27. Auditor continues as above handling each list question-

by rotating the disc for each new question and asking for

an incident, another incident and the earliest incident

that he can recall. The questions to direct the PC to re -

sense the different perceptions are not all the same exact

patter as each must communicate as itself. The questions -

would be:



SIGHT: "Try to ‘see' what you saw in the incident."



"What did you 'see' at that time?"



SMELL.: "Recall the odors that you smelled in the incident"



"What odors did you smell at that time?"



TOUCH: "Recall what you were touching in the incident."



"What were you touching at that time?;'



COLOR: "Try to perceive the colors in the incident."



"What colors did you perceive at that time?"



TONE: "Try to contact the tone of the sounds present in the

incident."



"What tones were present at that time?"



EXTERNAL "Try to perceive the external motion in the incident."



MOTION: "What external motion did you perceive at that time?"



EMOTION: "Try to recall and feel again the emotion you felt

in the incident." "What emotion did you feel at that time?"



LOUDNESS: "Pay particular attention to the loudness of the

sounds in the incident."



"What was the loudness of the sounds at that time?"



BODY "Pay particular attention to your own body position in the



POSITION: incident."



"What was your body position at that time?"



SOUND: "Pay particular attention to the sounds in the incident."



"What sounds were there at that time?"



WEIGHT: "Pay attention to the weight of things in the incident."



"What was the weight of things at that time?"



PERSONAL "Pay attention to your personal motion in the incident."



MOTION: "What personal motion was there at that time?"



Each list is run to F/N Cog VGIs. You would then go on to

the next list.



In List 2 each list question has sub-questions which are

also asked, such as - "Can you recall an incident which

happened a long time ago?" "What year was it?" "What was

the month?" "What was the date?" "What was the hour?" You

would then direct him to pay particular attention to one of

the senses and so on as in the earlier list.



All new words must be cleared as you go along, clearing the

words of the questions backwards.



When starting List 5 give the PC an R-factor:



"In answering these questions particular attention should

be paid to happier incidents.



(See preface to List 5)





TR 00-23 ARC STRAIGHTWIRE TRIPLES UNBULLBAITED



TR 00-24 ARC STRAIGHTWIRE TRIPLES BULLBAITED



Ref: HCOB 27 Sept 68 ARC Straightwire



STEPS:



1. R- factor - "We are going to run an ARC SW Expanded

process called ‘ARC SW Triples'. This process has three

sets of commands with 4 commands in each set. Each set will

be run separately with the commands in that set run

alternately, one after the other, over and over."



2. Clear the first set of commands starting with the first

command clearing each word going backwards through the

command .



3. Run the first set of commands alternately, over and over

1-2-3-4, 1-2-3-4, etc. ) to F/N Cog VGIs. End off the

series of commands for that flow when F/N Cog VGIs is reached.



4. R - factor "Now we are going to run the second set of commands."



5. Clear the commands of Flow 2 in the same way as in Step 2.



6. Run the second Flow in the same way as in Step 3 to F/N

Cog VGIs.



7. R-factor "Now we are going to run the third set of commands"



8. Clear the commands of Flow 3 as in Step 2.



9. Run Flow 3 as in Step 3.





TR 00-25 HAVINGNESS UNBULLBAITED



TR 00-26 HAVINGNESS BULLBAITED



Ref: HCOB 3 Dec 56 B. Scn - HAA Techniques

PAB 54





STEPS:



1. R- factor "We are going to run the Havingness process

for ARC SW." Clear the word "Havingness". "This process has

three commands; each is run by itself repetitively."



(NOTE: As with the other processes PC is to tell you what

he found when he did the command. )



2. Clear the first command.



3. Run the first command repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs.



4 . R- factor - "Now we are going to run the second command."



5. Clear the command of Flow 2.



6. Run Flow 2 repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs.



7. R-factor - "Now we are going to run the third command."



8. Clear the command of Flow 3.



9 . Run Flow 3 repetitively to F/N Cog VGIs .



Mark Ingber

Flag Tech Compilations



Revised & Reissued as BTB

By Flag Mission 1234

I/C: CPO Andrea Lewis

2nd: Molly Harlow

Authorized by AVU

for the

BOARDS OF DIRECTORS

of the

CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY



BDCS:SW:AL:MH:MI:mh

Copyright c 1971, 1974 

by L. Ron Hubbard 

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 



[Ed Note: The later 1976 pack has the identical BTB with the

name Mark Ingber, which appears in the 1974 pack, removed from

the signature]



******** 



84. BTB   15 NOV 76 ARC Straightwire Quads



[Ed. Note: This is the QUAD version from the 1976 pack. 

The 1974 pack contained the TRIPLES version.



This Quad version adds a 4th flow (flow 0, you to yourself)

command to processes 4, 6, 7, 8, 11, and 12 below but is 

otherwise identical to the previous Triples version.



The triples version was 4 JAN 72RA revised 14 JUL 73,

revised & reissued 28 JUN 74 as BTB cancelling HCOB

of 4 JAN 72R same title.]





B O A R D T E C H N I C A L B U L L E T I N



15 NOVEMBER 1976

ISSUE I



Remimeo





CANCELS BTB 4 JANUARY 1972RB

"0-IV EXPANDED GRADE PROCESSES - TRIPLES

PART A ARC STRAIGHTWIRE"



( Revisisions in script. )



O-IV EXPANDED GRADE PROCESSES - QUADS



PART A



ARC STRAIGHTWIRE



This Bulletin gives a checklist of the Expanded Quad Grade

Process Commands. It is not all the possible processes for

this level. If more are needed to attain full EP for the

level, additional processes can be found in LRH Bulletins,

Books, Tapes, PABs and other issues.



Each process is run to its full End Phenomena of F/N, Cog,

VGIs. Any previously run are rehabbed or completed and and

missing flows run.



A copy of this checklist is placed in the folder of a pc

being run on Expanded Grades and the processes checked off

with the date each is run to EP.



On any of these processes where the pc answers only" yes"

or that he did it, find out what it was by asking" What was

it?" This keeps in the itsa line from pc to auditor.

(Reference HCOB 30 June 62.)



This Bulletin does not replace Source data.





1. REMEMBER SOMETHING



Ref: Dianetics 55 (page 129 in 1971 Edition)



"Remember something." Repetitive to EP. __________





2. RECALL A TIME



Ref: Staff Auditors Conference of 16 Feb 59



(refers to HCOB of 16 Feb 59 HGC

processes for those trained in engram

running or trained in these processes).



"Recall a time." Repetitive to EP. __________





3. COMM RECALL PROCESS



Ref: HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process.



"Recall a communication." Repetitive to EP. __________





4. THE ONLY BASIC AFFINITY PROCESS



Ref: HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process.



"What would you like to confront?"



Repetitive to EP. __________



"What would another like to confront?"



Repetitive to EP. __________



"What would others like to confront?"



Repetitive to EP. __________



"What would you like to confront in yourself?"



Repetitive to EP. __________





4A. EXHAUSTION



Ref: HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process.



"Recall exhaustion."



Repetitive to EP. __________





5. PAST AND FUTURE EXPERIENCE



Ref: HCOB 16 Feb 59 HGC Processes for those

trained in engram running or trained in

these processes.



HCOB 16 Feb 59 Staff

Auditors Conference.



"What part of your life would you be willing to re-experience?"



"What part of the future would you be willing to experience?"



Run Alternately to EP. __________





6. FORGETTING - 6 WAY BRACKET



Ref: HCOB 8 Apr 58 A Pair of Processes.

PAB 143.



"Recall (or think of) something you wouldn't mind"



Run the bracket in sequence to EP.



1."Forgetting yourself." __________



2."Another person forgetting." __________



3."Forgetting about another." __________



4."Another forgetting about you." __________



5."Other people forgetting." __________



6."Another person forgetting about another person."

__________





7 . CAUSE ELEMENTARY STRAIGHTWIRE



Ref: HCOB 9 Mar 60 Expansion of OT-3A Procedure,

step two HGC allowed processes.



HCOB 20 Apr 60 Processes.



"What would it be all right for another to make forgotten?"



Repetitive to EP. __________



"What would it be all right for you to make forgotten?"



Repetitive to EP . __________



"What would it be all right for others to make forgotten?"



Repetitive to EP . __________



"What would it be alright for you to make forgotten about

yourself ?"



Repetitive to EP. __________





8 . DUPLICATION STRAIGHTWIRE



Ref: HCOB 9 Mar 60 Expansion of OT-3A Procedure,

step two HGC allowed processes



"What would another permit to have happen again ?"



Repetitive to EP. __________



"What would you permit to have happen again ?"



Repetitive to EP. __________



"What would others permit to have happen again ?"



Repetitive to EP. __________



"What would you permit to have happen to yourself again ?"



Repetitive to EP. __________





9. KNOW TO MYSTERY RECALL PROCESS



Ref: HCOB 20 Oct 59 An Experimental Process



Scn 0-8 Expanded Know to Mystery Scale



"Recall an unconsciousness." to EP __________



"Recall waiting." to EP __________



"Recall a mystery." to EP __________



"Recall sex." to EP __________



"Recall eating" to EP __________



"Recall a symbol." to EP __________



"Recall thinking." to EP __________



"Recall an effort." to EP __________



"Recall an emotion." to EP __________



"Recall looking." to EP __________



"Recall knowing about." to EP __________



"Recall not knowing." to EP __________



"Recall knowing." to EP __________







10. SELF ANALYSIS LISTS



Ref: PAB 46

Book Self Analysis (Run per instructions in book.)





List One. to EP __________



List Two. to EP __________



List Three: Time Sense to EP __________



  Sight to EP __________



  Relative Sizes to EP __________



  Sound to EP __________



  Olfactory to EP __________



  Touch to EP __________



  Personal Emotion to EP __________



  Organic Sensation to EP __________



  Motion Personal to EP __________



  Motion External to EP __________



  Body Position to EP __________



List Four. to EP __________



List Five. to EP __________



List Six. to EP __________



List Seven. to EP __________



List Eight. to EP __________



List Nine. to EP __________



List Ten. to EP __________



List Eleven. to EP __________



List Twelve. to EP __________





11. ARC STRAIGHTWIRE TRIPLES



Ref: HCOB 27 Sept 68 ARC Straight Wire



SW Fl. 



"Recall a time that was really to you."



"Recall a time someone was in good communication with you."



"Recall a time someone really felt affinity for you."



"Recall a time anothor knew he/she understood you."



to EP __________





SW. F2. 



"Recall a time that was really real to another."



"Recall a time you were in good communication with someone."



"Recall a time you really felt affinity for someone"



"Recall a time you knew you understood someone."



to EP __________





SW. F3. 



"Recall a time that was really real for others."



"Recall a time another was in communication with others."



"Recall a time another really felt affinity for others."



"Recall a time another knew he/she understood others."



to EP __________





SW. F0. 



"Recall a time you were really real to yourself."



"Recall a time you were in good communication with yourself."



"Recall a time you really felt affinity for yourself."



"Recall a time you knew you understood yourself."



to EP __________





12. HAVINGNESS



Ref: HCOB 3 Dec 56 B. Scn - HAA Techniques

PAB 54



SWH F1. "Look around here and find something

that is really real to you."



to EP __________



SWH F2. "Look around here and find something

that would be really real to another."



to EP __________





SWH F3. "Look around here and find something

that would be really real to others."



to EP __________



SWH F0. "Look around here and find something

that you could make really real to yourself."



to EP __________





Reissued as BTB

by Flag Mission 1234

I/C: CPO Andrea Lewis

2nd: Molly Harlow



Revised by FMO 1689 I/C

for Tr & Serv Aide

Approved by Snr C/S Flag, CS-5

Authorized by AVU

and LRH Pers Com



for the

BOARDS OF DIRECTORS

of the

CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY



BDCS:KU:DM:JE:JG:PD:AL:MH:lf

Copyright c 1973, 1974, 1976

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



[Ed Note: The previous TRIPLES version mentioned at the

begining had W/O (Warrant Officer) Mark Ingber as the

author followed by the begining of the signature above

up to but not including FMO 1689.]



******** 



85. BOOK Creation of Human Ability R2-31





R2-31: BEINGNESS PROCESSING



Exerpted from the Book: Creation of Human Ability



The cardinal rule where mental or physical compulsions are

concerned follows: WHATEVER THE THETAN IS DOING OBSESSIVELY

OR COMPULSIVELY, HAVE HIM DO IT ON A SELF-DETERMINED BASIS.



This applies to machines, habits, twitches, etc.



There is a gradient scale of exteriorization which could be

described as follows: first, the thetan without contact

With a universe then a thetan in full contact with a

universe then a thetan in contact with part of a universe,

who considers the remainder of the universe barred to him

then a thetan in a universe without any contact with any

part of the universe then a thetan unknowingly in contact

with a large part of a universe. The first condition would

be a true Static, the last condition is called colloquially

in Scientology, ‘buttered all over the universe. As it is

with a universe such as the physical universe, so it is

with physical bodies. The thetan who has already gone

through the cycle on the universe itself may be in contact

with a physical body in the same order. At first he would

be without association with a physical body then with

occasional contact with bodies then with a fixed contact on

one body, but exteriorized then interiorized into a body,

but easy to exteriorize then in contact with and

interiorized into a body, but withdrawn from the various

parts of the body and then obsessively ‘buttered all

through the body' then obsessively and unknowingly drawn

down to some small portion of the body, and so forth. This

is the gradient scale which includes inversion and then

inversion of the inversion. The auditor will discover

preclears are very variable in the matter of exteriorization.



Some preclears, even when they have a dark field,

exteriorize rather easily. Others, after a great deal of

work, are still found to be difficult to exteriorize. The

matter of exteriorization is the matter of which level of

inversion the preclear is in. One of the more difficult

levels to work is so inverted that he thinks that a thetan

is running him. In other words, here is a thetan

functioning in a body and actually running it through

various covert communication lines, who yet believes he is

a body to such an extent that he considers himself, or any

life around him to be some other being. When discussing the

matter of a thetan, this preclear is likely to tell the

auditor, ‘I'm over there'. This is about the only signal

the auditor gets from such a case which tells him that the

preclear is being a body, and considers that he is being

run by another thetan.



Very often an auditor will "exteriorize" such a person, he

thinks, only to have the preclear say, "I'm over there". A 

thetan who knows he is a thetan is always "here" and never 

"there".



The diagnostic manifestation, however, which the auditor

first encounters in any case where he is having difficulty

with exteriorization is contained in Beingness. Those on

lower levels of inversion are having a great deal of

difficulty being anything. Such people are below the level

of being a body, therefore it would be far up-scale for

this person to be able to be a body with certainty. A

person who cannot exteriorize easily must be brought up to

the level where he can be a body before he can then be

exteriorized from the body. In other words, an auditor

exteriorizing anyone has to follow such a scale as

Beingness Processing.



Oddly enough, Beingness Processing is an excellent

exteriorization tool, and I say



‘Oddly enough' because, in one sense, Beingness Processing

is an Alter-is-ness process.



When a case is extremely inverted it is necessary to get

the case up to a level where it can identify itself with

something. Beingness is essentially an identification of

self with an object.



The commands used in Beingness Processing should begin with

the environment and the vicinity of the preclear. One has

the preclear look around the auditing room and select an

object, let us say a chair. The auditor does this by saying

‘Look around the room and discover some object which you

don't mind being present'. Remember always, that when an

auditor asks a question, that question has to be answered

by the preclear. It is the auditor's bad luck if he asks a

question which introduces an enormously long communication

lag in the preclear.



The preclear must still answer the question. At this

question, then, ‘Discover something you don't mind being

present', it is necessary that the preclear actually locate

something, even if a dust mote. The auditor then asks the

preclear to ‘Locate something else you don't mind being

present'. And when all communication lag is gone from this

level of process, the auditor then picks out an object

which the preclear was comfortable about and says: ‘Now see

this (chair) here', ‘All right, what else wouldn't you mind

this (chair) being?' And then, as the preclear answers

this, and using this same object, the auditor continues to

ask the same question until all communication lag is gone

from the question: ‘What else wouldn't you mind this

(chair) being?'



The auditor then selects other objects in the area and uses

the same question on them:



‘What wouldn't you mind this (couch) being?', ‘What else

wouldn't you mind this (couch) being?' When the preclear 

is perfectly willing to have anything in the room be 

a large number of things, including the walls, the 

ceiling, and the floor the auditor asks: 'Now what 

wouldn't you mind your body being?' And whatever

the preclear answers, 'And now what else wouldn't you mind

your body being?' Finally, when the preclear is able to do

all the foregoing in Beingness Processing, the auditor

commands him: 'Now let's find something you wouldn't mind

being', and, as this is the question for which the auditor

has been working, he uses this question for a very long

period of time, asking over and over, 'What else wouldn't

you mind being?'



It will be discovered in working Beingness Processing that

the entire mechanism of winning Valences occurs. Here, for

instance, is a thetan who is caught in a theta trap. After

a while he will consider that the trap itself is surviving,

which is to say that the motions of the trap have

themselves set the thetan into motion so that he now thinks

of himself totally as a trap. (This is how anybody gets to

be anything -- by getting set into motion by the vibrations

in his vicinity.)



At first the thetan is willing to be the trap, but after a

while, if asked to be the trap and then asked to be the

thetan (and this is not a process), the most terrible

apathy will be found to intervene between the two steps.

The thetan, while fairly comfortable being the trap, on

beginning to recover some of his own identity, will be

found to be at a point on the tone scale so low as to

contain an unbearable and agonizing apathy.



Beingness Processing recovers the various valences which

the thetan is trying to avoid.



As a practical example in life, we find a housewife who is

incapable of keeping house.



Although intelligent and able in most things, we find she

cannot sweep, make beds, or even shop for the house. We

discover that her mother was an excellent housekeeper, an

excellent cook, and could shop very well. If this is the

case, then we would also discover that the one person in

this world our preclear does not want to be is her mother.

In other words, by being unable to be her mother, she is

also unable to be all those things which her mother could

do or be. In other words, the matter of valences is also a

matter of packages of abilities, and where an individual is

unable to be something which has certain definite

abilities, he also cannot achieve those abilities, and

this, in itself, is the heart of disability.



In running Beingness Processing it will be discovered that

the imagination of the preclear revives to a marked extent.

This is a process which requires a skilled auditor, a

patient auditor, and one who is willing to level every

communication lag he encounters by repeating the same

question over and over, each time waiting to receive a

definite answer. It is not a process which one starts and

leaves uncompleted.





******** 





86. PAB   8 JUL 55 PAB 56 Axiom 51 and Comm Processing



P.A.B. No. 56



PROFESSIONAL AUDITOR'S BULLETIN



From L. RON HUBBARD



Via Hubbard Communications Office



163 Holland Park Avenue, London W.11



_____________________________________



8 July 1955



AXIOM 51 AND COMMUNICATION PROCESSING



Let me give you a small review on communication. Axiom 51

says that MEST cannot change MEST, and we find that

postulates and live communication do change MEST. MEST

cannot change MEST, therefore a pair of forceps cannot

basically change a tooth condition.



This is sweeping and I want you to realize how sweeping it

actually is. A medical doctor would not be able to alter

completely a broken leg. You may say, "That's silly, of

course he could. He could come in and snap the bone back

into place and the fellow would feel a lot better." No, I'm

sorry, a medical doctor cannot over a period of time change

a broken leg. Do you know what will happen? Let's look at

it from the standpoint of life, now, and we find out that

the individual got attention for his broken leg, didn't he?

It will emerge as rheumatism some day.



In the next life it will emerge as two broken legs! We're

going to get a repetition of this because as soon as you

attempt to change MEST with MEST in one fashion or another

you are going to get persistence, and that is all.

Persistence of what?



In view of the fact that all conditions are postulated

conditions, and that the consideration behind them that

they are bad or good is simply again a consideration, if we

say persist it doesn't mean that it is either bad or good,

it simply means that condition. What condition is it? The

condition we are trying to change. And whenever we try to

change MEST with MEST we get a persistence of that

condition. It will crop up one way or another, and you will

see this time after time.



Dealing as we are in a very high echelon of live

communication, when we try to alter a condition with MEST

we get this persistence. Restimulation is the condition

persisting in the auditor, as an auditor who goes around

altering energy masses gets restimulated. The auditor comes

along and says, "Now all I have to do is change this energy

mass one way or the other," and he may succeed in doing so

as far as he can see for the moment. So he goes off

restimulated. That is the condition persisting. It's going

to persist, one way or the other. The only motto back of

MEST is "PERSIST."



But we have this licked. Hence Axiom 51. Postulates and

live communication actually can bring about a permanent

change and can actually stop a persistence.



Now, this process, "What wouldn't you mind ____ communicating 

with?"



"What wouldn't mind you communicating with?" is actually

not a low echelon process. A low-echelon preclear, one with

no mock-ups and very little reality, one who is not well

off, will not be touched by this process. He cannot

assimilate the process. Why? Because, to run this process,

you have to have the cooperation of the preclear's ability

to as-is. You have to have the ability of the preclear to

have a cognition and the ability of the preclear to as-is a

piece of energy, that is, to make a perfect duplicate of it.



Where, then, does that leave this process to be totally

functional? It leaves it upstairs, because when you run it

downstairs, the individual begins to "chew energy." Just

"chewing the energy around" doesn't make it persist, but,

with all this chewing, he isn't as-ising anything.



All he is doing is moving mass "A" to position "B." Anybody

who is doing this gets no cognition out of it at all. He is

waiting for that piece of energy to tell him something, and

this tells you a great deal about the preclear who couldn't

run an engram. He was waiting for the MEST to say something.



The preclear who could run engrams could still play a game

well enough to make the MEST say over and over again what

the MEST had imprinted on it. That is exactly why an engram

could run and why we had success in running engrams, and

when an engram disappeared that is exactly what happened.

It was up there all right, it was up there in lights, but

it wasn't saying anything. It was a bunch of sound waves

imprinted on a bunch of molecules of one kind or another,

and the preclear had to sort of pretend it was saying these

things over and over. In other words, he made it talk. Now

today an individual gets an engram in front of his face and

you just tell him to make it talk. Make it say, if you

please, exactly what is in the engram, or make it say

anything—it doesn't matter which.



As we look over this running of an engram, let us say that

we are getting an individual to run birth. What we are

doing is to get an energy mass called birth to articulate

to an individual, and it would run very handsomely indeed

if we had the preclear saying Okay. This is actually a

terrifically effective way to run an engram. If we wanted

to start today running engrams, we could, full out, and

achieve tremendously superior successes because we could

certainly run any kind of an engram in the bank. We could

dream it up, and the preclear could dream it up, could do

anything he wanted to, just to make these energy masses talk.



Of course very strange phenomena happen on an occluded case

when you have him dream up the fact that he has the concept

of an engram in front of him. You just look at him and you

say, "Now let's make believe that you have birth in

restimulation in front of you." (This would be a roughie,

and a weird way to go about it.) "And now let's pick up the

engram at the point where the doctor is saying, 'If you

will just take this pint of strychnine, mamma, the child

will be born much earlier.' " You have him to make this

concept say this, and have him say Okay to that.



The strange part of it is that you don't have to pay any

attention to whether birth shows up or not. I counted the

number of births on an individual one time and it was

several thousand, believe me, and they all go back to Fac

Ones and things like that. So we just have him get the idea

that he has birth in front of him and have it articulate.

Quite often this totally occluded case will have a complete

birth show up and begin to run off. But, he was totally

occluded, wasn't he? He couldn't run an engram.



We could just buckle right down at that point and actually

run that engram with Okays from the preclear, just as it

showed up, or we could go on running a synthetic engram. In

either case facsimiles would go out of restimulation in the

individual. As long as we have communication those energy

masses will disintegrate and you will stop the persistence

of the condition.



So let's look at the optimum way that I know of at this

moment—the best way I know of—to separate universes, on

which I have had considerable success and to date have had

no failures as long as the preclear could at least

articulate anything. As long as you can make him do

anything at all you can make him do this. You have seen the

process already.



"Give me some things you could say to your mother." If you

wanted to make this very perfect, if he is unable to play a

game you don't have to (very often the preclear is unable

to play a game), you would say, "Now get the idea mamma is

out there saying Okay to all of this." "Now give me

something else you could say to your mother." Then you say, 

"Get the idea mamma is out there and have her say 'Okay.' " 

"Now give me some things that mamma could say to you."



Now you will get a positive blow-apart in a fairly rapid

order of the interiorization of the universe. We know very

well that people interiorize into a body, into other

bodies, into MEST objects, into planets. So, if you were to 

run this one all the way backward you would take somebody 

who is obviously seen to be interiorized into earth, and 

what would you have him do?



You would say, "All right now, give me something earth

could say to you." If he is really interiorized into earth

he'll think up something. Then you have him say Okay.



The next thing you know he will get the ball of earth 'way

out there somewhere. Maybe it's the first picture he has

ever had! You will say, "That's fine. Now give me some more

things that earth could say to you." "Now give me some

things you could say to earth," and very ordinarily he will

come right on up the tone scale. You will never see such

perfect behavior of a tone scale as when you use a MEST object.



Then we would pick out (if we really were bent on exteriorizing 

Mr. Doakes and Mr. Doakes was interiorized into the interiorizations) 

another universe when we knew that we had the first one blown, and

we would know that because his physiological condition

would very definitely alter. We would go on to the next

likely universe.



We find this fellow who has been a linotype operator for

eight thousand seven hundred and sixty-two months, or

something of the sort. We don't have to be specific. We

pick a linotype machine, and we say if he got into earth he

certainly got there via some sort of apparatus he was

controlling, so we say, "All right, what could a linotype

machine say to you?" He would think it over for a moment. A

very literal-minded fellow would probably say, "It could

say 'clank.' "



"Okay, have it say clank."



"You know, I don't get any sonic on this," he'd say. (I've

had this happen.) "Well, just get the idea of its saying

clank."



"Well, it's going clank, all right."



("Oh no you don't," says the auditor, aside and to

himself.) "Have it SAY clank." "Have it SAY clank? A

linotype machine can't . . . well, I guess it could. On

thinking it over I guess a linotype machine could.... All

right, I'll have it say clank." "All right. Now have it say

something else." He does, and we blow him out of the

universe of the linotype machine.



Now let's pick the wife he hates worst, or something like

that. What could she say? etc.



Admittedly this is not a short process, but it keeps going

faster and faster. Next we would pull him out of papa and

mamma, and maybe grandma and grandpa, and so on. We are

doing one of these schoolbook, by the table, separations.

Then we say, "Now give me something your body could say to

you."



"My body say something to me?"



And away we would go, and we would blow him out of his head.



It will work with almost that mechanical ease. The question

is, how many hours of auditing would it take to bring

somebody who is totally interiorized into a planet out

through these various stages and finally out of his head?

As far as I'm concerned it is the minimum number of hours

he could be audited for maximum result.



We could do a tremendous number of things for him. We could

do a momentary patch-up on a lot of things, we could do

this and we could do that, but if we were going straight

toward the goal of making this individual into the highest

level of condition that we could make him

into, we would follow a process just about like this. It

would be slow, and it would be arduous, but we would get

better, and better, and better. He would finally get to a

point where he could feel these things blow off and blow

out on him.



I went so far one time as to try to exteriorize a fellow

from his engram bank. I think I exteriorized a lot of

thetans from that bank, but I never got the fellow out of

it entirely because I didn't have the time. His track

finally stretched out in all directions and he could view

it clearly, and then he was terribly interested and wanted

to run and have to do with each individual engram and there

were about seventy-six trillion years worth of them. Then

there was the whole GE line. So I abandoned that attempt.

He felt wonderful, though, and went around telling

everybody he was cleared. Compared to his earlier state he

sure was. He was cleared easily from eight or nine heavy

engrams in about eight or nine hours' auditing.



The articulation of the actual communication would be

something you would do on an individual who is having the

vaguest difficulty playing a game, who couldn't as-is birth

at a glance. And this is the conclusion I have reached

rather arduously over these past weeks on this. I give you

data when I have it.



Axiom 51 is right. It says you can't change MEST with MEST,

but postulates and live communication can change it. But

realization on the part of a preclear with no cognition is

not possible. So if he can't realize, that means he can't

as-is, so if he can't as-is, there he is. But I have seen

preclears pass right on up the line from cognition zero to

almost instantaneous cognition. In the Air Force they have

ceiling zero. We have cognition zero, but it's the same

thing—total fog.



It is immensely safe for an auditor to change by

communication. There is no restimulation involved.



(the following is handwritten)



Text: R-39 Conceiving Something Interesting.  Interest

is the keynote of attachment.





******** 







