A Freezone Bible Supporter



Here is a complete Level 0 Academy pack from the 1970s

being posted in 11 parts.  Contents below following the

FZ Bible mission statement.



Much Love,



Tech Lover





**************************************************



FREEZONE BIBLE MISSION STATEMENT



Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology

Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.



The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of

Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the

copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.



They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be

stamped out as heritics.  By their standards, all Christians, 

Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered

to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.



The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings

of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.



We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according

to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.



But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,

the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old 

testament regardless of any Jewish opinion.  



We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion

as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures

without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.



We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do

not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope

that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose

to aid us for that reason.



Thank You,



The FZ Bible Association



**************************************************





******** LEVEL ZERO ACADEMY COURSE PACK ********



Level 0 Academy Course Packs (2) circa 1974 and 1976,

Almost identical [Ed Note: differences noted like this]



Dark blue soft cardboard cover 

8 1/2 by 14 inch 4 hole punched & held together by 

double retainer clips. As issued by Pubs US.



This is complete including book excerpts but does not include

the complete book "Self Analysis" which is also part of the

level (it was posted to the internet last year).



This does not include transcripts of the level 0 tapes, but

we are working on those and will post them eventually.



Note that in the 1970s, HCOBs not written by Ron were converted

to BTBs (Board Technical Bulletins), resulting in the freequent

"reissued as BTB" designation.



Note that bulletins have a "distribution" near the top stating

where they are to be used.  A common distribution is "remimeo"

which means that the orgs may run copies on their mimeo machines.

Another, older, designation is "CenOcon" which means "Central

Orgs Continental".  Others such as "D of T" (director of training)

refer to posts in the Scientology organization.





********



CONTENTS:



part 1



01. BPL   26 JAN 72R  SCIENTOLOGY LEVEL 0 STANDARD ACADEMY CHECKSHEET

02. HCOPL  7 FEB 65 reiss. 15 JUN 70 Keeping Scientology Working

03. HCOPL 17 JUN 70 Technical Degrades

04. HCOB  11 JUN 64 New Student Data

05. HCOB  25 JUN 71R rev. 25 NOV 74 Barriers To Study

06. HCOPL 31 MAY 68 Auditors

07. BPL   17 MAY 71RA r.13 NOV 72 r.10 JUN 74 Study Points and Conditions

08. HCOPL 27 MAY 65 Processing



part 2



09. HCOPL 15 DEC 65 Student's Guide To Acceptable Behavior

10. HCOPL 14 FEB 65 Safeguarding Technology

11. HCOB  27 SEP 66 The Anti-Social Personality

12. HCOPL 22 NOV 67 Rev. 18 JUL 70 Out Tech

13. HCOPL  8 JUN 70 Student Auditing

14. BPL   25 JUN 70RA Expanded Lower Grades

15. HCOB  25 SEP 71RA rev 4 APR 74 Tone Scale In Full

16. BTB   20 JUL 74 Basic Auditing Drills

17. HCOPL 14 OCT 68R rev 1 JAN 76 The Auditor's Code



part 3



18. BTB    6 NOV 72R rev 25 JUL 74 Admin 14R The Worksheets

19. BTB    6 NOV 72R rev 27 AUG 74 Admin 13R The Auditor Report Form

20. BTB    6 NOV 72R rev 28 JUL 74 Admin 12R The Summary Report Form

21. BTB   20 JUN 70 reiss 21 JUL 74 Summary Report

22. BTB    6 NOV 72RA rev 20 NOV 74 Admin 11RA The Exam Report

23. HCOPL  8 MAR 71 Examiner's Form

24. BTB    5 NOV 72R rev 9 SEP 74 Admin 7R The Folder Summary

25. BTB   24 APR 69R rev 8 SEP 74 Preclear Assessment Sheet

26. HCOPL 23 APR 68 Parent or Guardian Assent Forms

27. HCOB  16 AUG 71 Training Drills Modernized



part 4



28. HCOB  24 OCT 71 False TA

29. HCOB  24 OCT 71 False TA Addition 

30. HCOB  15 FEB 72 False TA Addition 2

31. HCOB  18 FEB 72 False TA Addition 3

32. HCOB  29 FEB 72R rev 23 NOV 73 False TA Checklist

33. HCOB  23 NOV 73 Dry and Wet Hands Make False TA

34. HCOB  21 OCT 68 Floating Needle

35. HCOB  11 FEB 66 Free Needles, How To Get Them On a PC

36. HCOB  21 SEP 66 ARC Break Needle

37. HCOB  20 FEB 70 Floating Needles and End Phenomena

38. HCOB   8 OCT 70 C/S Ser 20 Persistent F/N

39. HCOB  21 MAR 74 End Phenomena

40. HCOB  14 MAR 71R r. 25 JUL 73 F/N Everything

41. HCOB  14 OCT 68 Meter Position

42. BTB   14 JAN 63 Rings Causing "Rock Slams"

43. HCOB  18 MAR 74 E-Meter Sensitivity Errors

44. BTB   16 JUN 71R r. 22 JUL 74 Advanced E-Meter Drills

45. HCOB  11 MAY 69 Meter Trim Check

46. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 11 Metering

47. HCOB  10 DEC 65 E-Meter Drill Coaching



part 5



48. HCOB   7 APR 64 Q And A

49. HCOB   3 AUG 65 Auditing Goofs Blowdown Interruption

50. HCOB   5 FEB 66 Letting The PC Itsa

51. HCOB   7 MAY 69 The Five GAEs

52. HCOB  17 MAY 69 TRs and Dirty Needles

53. BTB    4 JUL 69 r. 6 JUL 74 Auditing of OT 3 Preclears

54. BTB   17 JUL 69 r. 28 JUN 74 Flagrant Auditing Errors

55. HCOB  29 JUL 64 Good Indicators At Lower Levels

56. BTB   26 APR 69 r. 7 JUL 64 Bad Indicators

57. HCOPL  4 APR 72 rev. 7 APR 72 Ethics And Study Tech

58. HCOB  14 NOV 65 Clearing Commands

59. BTB    2 MAY 72R r. 10 JUN 74 Clearing Commands

60. BTB   18 NOV 68R r. 9 JUN 74 Model Session

61. HCOB  12 AUG 69 Flying Ruds

62. HCOB  23 AUG 71 (24 May 70 rev) Auditors Rights

63. HCOB   6 NOV 64 Styles of Auditing



part 6



64. HCOB  30 APR 71 Auditing Comm Cycle

65. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 2R The Two Parts Of Auditing

66. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 3 Three Important Comm Lines

67. HCOB  23 MAY 71R aud ser 4R Comm Cycles Within the Auditing Cycle

68. HCOB  23 MAY 71R aud ser 5R The Comm Cycles In Auditing



part 7



69. HCOB  12 JAN 59 Tone of Voice - Acknowledgement

70. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 6 Auditor Failure To Understand

71. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 7 Premature Acknowledgements

72. HCOPL  1 JUL 65 Comm Cycle Additives

73. HCOB  29 SEP 65 Cyclical and Non-Cyclical Processes

74. HCOB  17 MAR 74 TWC, Using Wrong Questions

75. BOOK  Dianetics 55 Chapter 12 The 6 Basic Processes



part 8



76. HCOB  16 FEB 59 Staff Auditor's Conference



part 9



77. HCOB  20 OCT 59 An Experimental Process

78. HCOB  16 FEB 59 HGC Processes for those trained in Engram Running

79. HCOB   8 APR 58 A Pair Of Processes

80. HCOB   9 MAR 60 Expansion of OT-3A Procedure, Step Two

81. HCOB  20 APR 60 Processes

82. HCOB  27 SEP 68 ARC Straight Wire

83. BTB    9 OCT 71RA r. 28 JUN 74 ARC Straightwire Drills

84. BTB   15 NOV 76 ARC Straightwire Quads

85. BOOK  Creation of Human Ability R2-31

86. PAB    8 JUL 55 PAB 56 Axiom 51 and Comm Processing



part 10



87. PAB   18 JUN 55 PAB 54 Reality Level of Preclear

88. HCOB  17 MAR 60 Standardized Sessions

89. HCOB   4 MAY 59 An Affinity Process

90. HCOB   2 MAR 61 New Pre-Hav Command

91. HCOB  25 SEP 59 HAS Co-Audit

92. HCOB  21 JUL 59 HGC Allowed Processes

93. BOOK   Creation of Human Ability R2-60

94. HCOB  13 OCT 59 D.E.I. Expanded Scale

95. HCOB   7 MAY 59 New Process Theory

96. BOOK   Scn 8-8008 6 Levels of Processing Issue 5

97. HCOB  11 DEC 64 Scientology 0 Processes

98. HCOB  26 DEC 64 Routine 0-A Expanded



part 11



99. BTB    9 OCT 71RA r. 29 JUL 74 Level 0 Drills

100. BTB  15 NOV 76 Grade Zero Processes - Quads



********



28. HCOB  24 OCT 71 False TA





HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



HCO BULLETIN OF 24 OCTOBER 1971



Remimeo

Add to E-Meter Books,

studies,

Checksheets





FALSE TA



Some pcs have a very difficult time in auditing due solely

to can (electrode) outnesses.



Some auditors have heavy losses because they do not realize

the troubles that can come from electrodes and thus remedy

them.





TA USE



The TA must be between 2 and 3 for a correct F/N.



When the TA is reading falsely a pc can be butchered.



Example: Auditor talking the TA down. It gets to "3.1" by

his meter. So he gets the pc to talk a bit more to get the

TA between 2 and 3 and F/N. The TA suddenly rises to 3.8.



Pc and Auditor go desperate. What has happened is that the

TA was a false read. It was really reading 2.9 and F/Ning

but for reasons given below it read "3.1". Thus the auditor

overran the F/N and by keeping on invalidated the release,

pulled the pc's attention out of session and demanded more

than the pc had to give.



Example: Auditor 2 way communicating with pc to get the TA

up from "1.8". The TA suddenly sinks to 1.6, pc goes into

apathy.



What happened was a missed F/N. For reasons covered below

the TA at 1.8 was false and was really at 2.1 and F/Ning.



Example: Pc being asked for an earlier similar incident

because TA is at "4.0". Pc can't get one, gets desperate,

TA goes to 5.0.



For reasons given below the TA was at 3.0 but was reading

falsely at "4.0".



Some cases get upset at the very idea of F/N when these

mistakes are made.



More than one case has missed all his wins for a year

because of a false TA.



So it is very important to know how a false TA comes about

and how to avoid it.



A properly set up meter with cans (electrodes) fitted to a

pc who is holding them properly IS ALWAYS CORRECT.



However, totally false Tone Arm readings can exist and an

auditor must know how these come about.





TRIM



A meter can be improperly trimmed (not set at 2.0 with the

trim knob) and can give a false TA position.



Further, when a meter is not left on a minute or two before

trimming, it can drift in the session and give a slightly

false TA.



The trim can be quietly checked in mid-session by snapping

out the jack where the cord goes into the box and putting

the TA on 2, seeing if the needle is now on SET. If not,

the trim knob can be moved to adjust it. The jack is

quietly slipped back in. All without distracting the pc.





DISCHARGED



A cadmium cell meter discharges very suddenly when it does go flat.



In mid-session the meter can run out of battery. The TA

will cease to act well and may go very false.



The remedy is to keep a meter charged at least one hour for

every 10 of auditing for 240 AC volt charging current, or 2

hours for every 10 of auditing on a 110 AC volt charging

current.



A meter lasts much longer than this in practice but the

above is very safe.



Before each session snap the knob over to TEST. The needle

should hit hard on the right side of the face. It can even

bounce. This guarantees lots of charge in the battery and

no chance of a meter going flat in session.



If the needle doesn't snap to the right hard or if it

doesn't quite get there on TEST, then that meter will go

flat in mid-session and give false TA and no reads or TA on

hot subjects.





ONE HAND ELECTRODE



A single hand electrode with two terminals separated by a

rubber works. BUT it always gives a falsely high TA.



A Solo auditor who does not know this can get a release

point and go half mad wondering why he is F/Ning at 4.0!



The answer is to make a "single hand" electrode out of two

small cans (about 33 inches by 21/8 inches or 91/2 cm by

51/2 cm) (or even smaller for a very small-handed pc). Glue

a thin circle of foam rubber solidly to the bottom of one

can so it reaches out slightly around the bottom. (Don't

glue it up the sides.)



Put the alligator jaw clips one to each can. Now put the

can bottoms together and hold them in one hand. Mark the TA

(1)—meaning one hand (such as 3.75 (1) ). Now take the cans

one in each hand and mark the TA (2)—meaning two hands

(such as 3.0



Audit with them in one hand. Keep your worksheet with (1)

marks (such as 3.5 (1) ).



Check at start and middle and end by taking a can in each

hand and putting down the 2 can read (such as 2.5 (2) ).



It is too much trouble to totally change cans and the

distraction can change the TA read.



This two small can arrangement is not quite accurate. It

gives a lower TA than big cans.



But the difference is slight. It can scare you with a 1.9

when trim is 2.0 and real TA is 2.0. If this happens check

with big cans.



(As an added tip a solo auditor usually keeps the back of

his hand on his leg while solo auditing. The small 7 1/2

volt current gives a tingle to the leg that is distracting

when one's hand is moist. Put a piece of foam rubber in a 

plastic sack. Lay the sack on the leg, put your hand on this 

pad. It insulates the area and is very comfortable.)





MOIST HANDS



When a pc's hands sweat a lot you will get a low TA.



Contrary to 19th Century superstition the meter does not

work on sweat. Very sweaty hands as found on nervous

persons give a false TA. It goes low.



Many "low TA cases" are just sweaty hand cases.



Paper handkerchiefs (Kleenex) are a standard item for an

auditing room—for grief charges and burning eyes, etc.

These should be available.



If the TA is low, check if the pc's hands are wet. If so,

have him wipe them and get a new read. It is usually found

that the 1.6 was really 2.0. Or the 1.6 was really 1.8 and

the trim was 1.8 = 2.0.



Have the pc wipe hands, check and correct trim before you

by-pass all a "low TA's" F/Ns!



TAs can go low. Invalidation of the pc, lousy TRs can drive

one low. If so the TA comes back up on repair.



But don't brand a case a low TA case until you make sure

his hands are dried and the meter trimmed.



Also, very small cans or cans too small for the pc can give

a slightly low reading.





DRY HANDS



Some pcs have extremely dry hands, usually from industrial

chemicals such as chlorine in dishwater or skin scale.



This can give a wildly high TA.



The pc can be worried to death with high TA repairs when in

fact he just doesn't have contact with the electrode.



Metal foot plates connected to the meter and the pc

barefooted in session will usually handle.



A quick test is have the pc put the cans under his armpits

and you'll see if it's his calloused or chemically

dried-out hands.





ARTHRITIC HANDS



A rare pc is so crippled with arthritis that he doesn't

make contact fully with the cans.



This gives a high TA.



Use foot plates or wide wrist straps and you'll get a right read.





SLACK GRIP



Sometimes a rare pc lets his hands go slack on the cans,

particularly if they are the wrong size cans, too big.



This gives a mysterious "high TA". It is false. The TA will

come down only to 3.2 and F/N and of course an overrun then

really gives a high TA. And the pc goes a bit frantic and

begins to believe things don't erase or release.



Keep the pc's hands in sight. Check the pc's grip. Get

smaller cans.





CAN SIZE



The most common fault is wrong can size.



For a normal or large-handed pc the can size is about 4 7/8

inches by 2 5/8 inches or 121/2 cm by 7 cm. This can be

altered as big as 41/2 inches by 3 inches diameter or 11 cm

by 8 cm. This is Standard.



This can is too large for people with small hands. These

should use a can 33/4 inches by 2 1/8 inches or 9 cm by 5

cm diameter or thereabouts.



A small child would be lost even with that can. So a small

35 mm film can could be used.



This is 2 inches long by 1 3/16 inches diameter or 5 cm by

3 cm. This works but watch it as these cans are aluminum.

They do work but test for true read with a slightly larger

can and then trim to adjust for the aluminum if any different.



Cans of course should be STEEL with a thin tin plating.

Regular soup cans.



Can size to match the pc avoids slack can grip or tiring

the hands into going slack, giving the auditor 3.2 F/Ns and

trouble.





COLD PC



A pc who is too cold sometimes has a falsely high TA.



Wrap him in a blanket or get a warmer auditing room.



The auditing environment is the responsibility of the auditor.





LATE AT NIGHT



Between 2 and 3 AM or late at night a pc's TA may be very

high. The time depends on when he sleeps usually.



This TA will be found normal in regular hours.





RINGS



Rings on the pc's hands must always be removed. They don't

influence TA but they give a false Rockslam.





FLOATING TA



Many an auditor before now has gone a bit mad trying to

handle a floating TA. They are not very common and are

startling.



What happens is the pc is so released the needle can't be

gotten onto the dial. The needle is swinging wider than the

meter dial both ways from center and appears to lay first

on one side then the other. The TA can't be moved fast

enough to keep the extreme floating needle on the dial.



This gives a false TA of sorts as it can't be read.



Some auditors seeing it for the first time have even sent

the pc out of the room so they could "adjust" the meter or

get another one!



Thus the very highest state of release can be invalidated

as where is the TA? 





RUSTY CORRODED CANS



You'd think soup was very expensive the way some auditors

hold onto old cans.



Corroded cans can falsify TA. Get new ones now and then.





TIGHT SHOES



And then there was the vain lady who wore shoes too small

for her feet.



She removed them every session. The session went well each time.



Then she put on her agonizing shoes and went to the

Examiner and the C/Ses and auditors all went mad trying to

find out why every Exam had a high TA.



Tight shoes.



-----------



The E-Meter is accurate. It is a lovely instrument.



You have to fit the pc to it.



Good luck.



L. RON HUBBARD

Founder



LRH: nt.rd 

Copyright ©1971 

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



********



29. HCOB  24 OCT 71 False TA Addition 





HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

    Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



       HCO BULLETIN OF 12 NOVEMBER 1971R



  (Revised 6.3.73. Only change is addition

       of the word "cold" - first para.)



Remimeo

Add to E-Meter Books

Studies

Checksheets

       FALSE TA ADDITION



     (Refers and adds to HCO B 24 Oct 1971

  "False TA")



   COLD CANS



    Regardless of can size, cold E-Meter electrodes tend to give a much higher

Tone Arm reading particularly on some pcs.



    Until the cans warm up, the reading is generally false and is false in the

direction of high.



    A chilled pc almost always has a high TA until he or she gets warm. Just

throwing a coat over the pc's shoulders can bring down a TA in a cool room.

But some pcs are "cool blooded" and the shock of ice-cold cans can drive the

TA up and it takes a while to drift down.



    This has a great effect on Examinations where the cans are used very

briefly.



    A practice which gets around this is for the auditor or examiner to hold

the cans briefly until they are warm and then give them to the pc. A variation

is for the auditor or examiner to put the cans under his armpits while setting

up. This warms them.



    There are probably many other ways to warm up cans to body temperature.



   FOOTPLATES



    Tests show that footplates do not give exactly the same read as hand-held

electrodes on pcs who have nothing wrong with their hands.



    This is probably due to body imbalances. Cans held under the armpits or

under knees (not advised as there sometimes is a tiny electrical sting) give

varied reads from hand-held cans.



    Where full weight rests on the footplates the read is also varied.



    To all practical purposes the differences can be neglected unless they

give trouble in getting F/Ns. One should simply be alert in using footplates

and find out the differences in new problems of false TA or no F/Ns develop

and handle any such trouble when it occurs. A person used to going barefoot

for instance would have foot calluses and would give a false footplate TA.



PCS WHO FALSIFY



    Some pcs (rare) take mistaken pride in being able to push the TA up by

straining or tensing.



    By just moving into the body the TA can be sent up by an otherwise

exterior pc.



    Some pcs also take a road out by "getting an F/N at will". They have

various tricks that do this, the main one being to "think of something else"

and get an F/N.



    Any of these (rare) pcs are manifesting out-of-sessionness. They aren't in

session.



    The definition on of In session is "interested in own case and willing to

talk to the auditor". Remedy that and they cease such tricks.



    Usually they aren't being run on what they are interested in or have comm

blocks or withholds or no confidence.



    They are easy to detect and easy to handle.



LRH:nt.

Copyright c 1971, 1973

by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON HUBBARD

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder



[Ed. Note - the above HCOB is in the 1974 pack but is missing

from the 1976 one]





********



30. HCOB  15 FEB 72 False TA Addition 2





HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



HCO BULLETIN OF 15 FEBRUARY 1972



Remimeo

All Tech

Qual Terminals





FALSE TA ADDITION 2



Reference: HCO B 24 Oct 71 False TA



HCO B 12 Nov 71 False TA Addition



C/S Series 53 HI-LO TA Assessment



Int Ext Correction List



There is an infinity of wrong ways to get a pc to read

between 2.0 and 3.0 on an E-Meter.



One method would be to shoot him. Dead bodies read between

2.0 and 3.0.



Another way is to throw the trim knob off.



Yet another wrong way is to use HAND CREAM to make the TA

go lower and call "F/Ns" at 4.0 on an actual read.



An auditor who is not very expert is apt to find strange

ways to do things because the usual is beyond his skill.



A GOOD auditor handles low and high TAs with HCO B 24 Oct

71 and Addition 12 Nov 71 and this HCO B "False TA", C/S

Series 53 and the Hi-Lo TA Assessment.



The commonest sources of high TA are PROTEST, OVERRUN and out

INTERIORIZATION RD and too big or too small cans.



The commonest sources of low TA are overwhelming auditor

TRs or wet sweaty hands.



The subject is not open to experimentation. If a pc's TA is

low or high and you don't correct it with the usual

remedies mentioned above, the pc goes into the soup.



GOOD AUDITORS KNOW THEIR TECH AND USE IT TO REMEDY HIGH AND

LOW TAs. GOOD AUDITORS DO HONEST WORKSHEETS AND HONEST AUDITING.



BE A GOOD AUDITOR.





L. RON HUBBARD

Founder



LRH: ne.rd

Copyright c 1972

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



********



31. HCOB  18 FEB 72 False TA Addition 3





HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE



Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



HCO BULLETIN OF 18 FEBRUARY 1972



Issue I



Remimeo



FALSE TA ADDITION 3



(There are now four False TA HCO Bs including this one.

These were issued as more data was uncovered.)



HCO B 24 Oct 71 False TA



HCO B 12 Nov 71 False TA Addition



HCO B 15 Feb 72 False TA Addition 2



and this one



HCO B 18 Feb 72 False TA Addition 3



A meter is a meter.



Meters are used to measure water, natural gas, and many

other things.



An E meter is used to measure a pc.



If you rig a meter up so as to falsify its reads you get a

wrong result.



You could rig up a water meter so it read that twice as

much water had flowed and then sit around and wonder all

week why the swimming pool never filled up.



The ACCURACY of a meter depends upon its being honestly set

up and honestly used.



The HONESTY of the auditor determines his results.



The whole field of psychotherapy was dishonest from the

days of witch doctors to psychiatry. Falsified data came

from lack of knowledge of the mind. This made its

practitioners DISHONEST.



We do not and must not follow that fatal road.



The technology we have WORKS to definite positive

predictable results.



Results are obtained if the auditor has honestly studied

and understood his materials and honestly applies them.



Falsifying study leads to falsifying meters and this gives

bad results on pcs.



HONEST use of the materials and the meter gives an honest result.



One who does not know his materials and who cannot do his

drills then thinks he has to make a meter cheat.



HONEST use of the meter by an HONEST auditor is the route

to GOOD RESULTS.





LOW TAs



A bad practice has arisen to "beat" the low TA.



This is to have the pc wipe his hands every few minutes to

get the TA up above 2.0.



Not only does this distract the pc and yank him out of

session, but it is by inference putting his attention on

the meter, a thing a good auditor does NOT do in a formal

session. The pc's attention must be on his own case in a

session, not on the meter or his hands.



An answer to low TA because of wet hands is foot plates.



But the best answer is to get the pc up scale so he doesn't

have perspiring hands.



Overwhelming TRs is the commonest reason for low TAs. Not

all the hand wiping in the world will cure poor TRs.



Some auditors "spook" (leap off the road like a horse

frightened by something blowing along) at the very thought

of high or low TAs. This is because they haven't got the

TRs to handle a low TA nor the tech to handle a high one.



Making a meter read falsely low with cream or falsely high

with talcum powder or wiping hands continually will not

handle the pc's CASE.



That is what the auditor is there to do, not make his

session look good! The funniest one I have ever heard was a

Solo auditor who had high TA trouble. So he used to fill up

a bathtub with scalding water, fill the bathroom full of

clouds of steam and then sit in the bath, holding onto his

electrodes "Solo auditing".



It gave him a lower TA but it sure didn't give him any case result.



We maybe ought to have a contest as to who can come up with

the most comical actual instances of falsifying meter reads.



One "auditor" "solved it" by just calling F/Ns whenever she

got tired of the pc regardless of TA position. After a year

or more of this she saw the light and put herself in Ethics.



The funny part is that her co-auditor had been doing the

same thing on her! HONEST TA IS THE BEST POLICY.





L. RON HUBBARD

Founder



LRH: ne.rd

Copyright c 1972

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



********



32. HCOB  29 FEB 72R rev 23 NOV 73 False TA Checklist





HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE



Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



HCO BULLETIN OF 29 FEBRUARY 1972R



REVISED 23 NOVEMBER 1973



Remimeo



All Levels



All Auditors



All Tech Checksheets



FALSE TA CHECKLIST



Ref: 

HCO B 24 Oct 71 False TA

HCO B 12 Nov 71 False TA Addition

HCO B 15 Feb 72 False TA Addition 2

HCO B 18 Feb 72 False TA Addition 3

HCO B 24 Jan 73 Examiner and False TA

HCO B 24 Nov 73 C/S 53RF

HCO B 23 Nov 73 Dry and Wet Hands



Make False TA



The following are the items to be checked by an auditor on

any pc. It need only be done once unless the check itself

is suspected false, or if conditions of the pc's hands, etc

change.



The checklist is kept in the pc folder and is entered on

the folder summary as an action done.



The value of operating with correct can size should not be

underestimated, the reference HCO Bs state why.



The auditor signs and answers the following points on the

checklist, and gets answers from the pc where needed.



_________



R-Factor to pc: "We are going to check the cans and adjust

them to get the best accuracy." 



1. Is the meter charged fully? _________



2. Is the meter trimmed correctly? _________



3. Are the leads connected to the meter and cans? _________



4. Are the cans rusty? _________



5. Are pc's hands excessively dry requiring vanishing

cream? _________



6. Are the pc's hands excessively wet requiring powder? _________



7. The pc is NOT being told continually to wipe his hands?

_________



8. The pc's grip on the cans is NOT being continually

checked by the auditor in a way that interrupts the pc? _________



9. TA position on large cans? _________



Size approx 4 7/8 inches by 2 5/8 inches or 12 1/2 cm by 7 cm



10. TA position on medium cans? _________



Size approx 3 3/4 inches by 2 1/8 inches or 9 cm by 5 cm



11. TA position on small cans? _________



Size approx 2 inches by 1 3/16 inches or 5 cm by 3 cm



12. Are the cans too large for pc? _________



13. Are the cans too small for pc? _________



14. Are the cans just right in size? _________



15. Are the cans cold? _________



16. Are the pc's hands dry or calloused? _________



17. Does the pc have arthritic hands? _________



18. TA position on foot plates? _________



(Foot plates are used and TA checked on them when the answer to

16 & 17 is affirmative.)



19. Are the pc's feet calloused or excessively wet or dry? _________



20. Does the pc loosen his grip on the cans? _________



21. Check the pc's grip, does he hold the cans correctly?

(See E-Meter Drill 5.) _________



22. Is the pc hot? _________



22a. Is the pc well slept? _________



23. Is the pc cold? _________



23a. Is the pc hungry? _________



24. Is it too late at night? _________



25. Is auditing being done not in the pc's normal regular

awake hours? _________ 



26. Are there rings on the pc's hands? _________



27. Is the pc wearing tight shoes? _________



28. Is the pc wearing tight clothes? _________



29. Is it actually chronic High or Low TA case condition? _________



30. Has the pc gone into despair over his TA? _________



The handling of these points is stated in the reference HCO Bs.



The handling of high or low TA after checking these points

is by C/S 53RF, Short Hi-Lo TA Assessment C/S.





The way to be sure of a C/S 53RF or Hi-Lo TA list is by

continued assessment and handling of these lists until an

F/N on assessment is gotten.



So standard tech handles the high and low TA. The C/S

Series gives more data on the subject.



Compiled by Flag XIIs



for



Training & Services Bureau

LRH:BL:JW:clb.rd

Copyright ©1972, 1973 Revised by

by L. Ron Hubbard L. RON HUBBARD

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Founder



[Ed Note: The 1973 revisions, which are in italics, consist

of adding the last 3 references (1973 dates) to the list of

references at the top plus questions number 5, 6, 19, 29,

and 30.]



********



33. HCOB  23 NOV 73 Dry and Wet Hands Make False TA





HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE



Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



HCO BULLETIN OF 23 NOVEMBER 1973



Remimeo



Tech & Qual



All Levels



All Tech Checksheets



DRY AND WET HANDS



MAKE FALSE TA



A couple of years ago some auditors were solving high TA

problems by putting hand cream on the pc's hands when they

were calloused and talcum powder on a pc's hands when they

were too wet. Since no research had been done they were

censured.



Research has now been done on this matter of dry and wet hands.



Apparently when a person has taken certain medicines or

chemicals, or uses detergent soaps or is in contact with

certain chemicals (such as those in some furniture

polishes) the ordinary skin oils vanish. These oils are

needed to make an electrical contact with the cans.



When these oils are absent, there is no adequate electrical

contact and the "TA is High".



When a person is deficient in certain minerals or vitamins

such as magnesium or B complex, his hands can be

excessively wet.



Either of these two conditions in hands or feet can produce

an incorrect TA position.



The dry condition produces a false high TA.



The overly wet condition produces a false low TA.



The TA depends on normally moist hands. This does not mean

the meter works on "sweat". It does mean the meter works

only when there is a correct electrical contact.



Too much and too greasy hand cream could produce too low a TA.



Too much powder or drier could produce too high a TA.



Therefore one must not go to extremes.





DRY HANDS



The excessively "dry" hand is seen as shiny or polished

looking. It feels very dry.



The correct treatment is to use a "vanishing cream"

(obtainable from any cosmetics store) not a greasy hand cream.



The "vanishing cream" is so called because it rubs all the

way into the skin and leaves no excess grease.



This restores normal electrical contact.



There are many such creams. It makes no difference which is

used so long as it vanishes into the skin.



It is doubtful if it would have to be applied more than

once—at session start—as it lasts for a long while.



This would apply to some footplate cases as well (whose

hands are defective or too heavily calloused).



If a cream leaves smears on a can, it is too heavily

applied or too little absorbed.



Vanishing type cream is usually smeared on, rubbed in and

can then be thoroughly wiped off. The hands (or feet) will

usually produce, then, a normal TA and meter response.





WET HANDS



Anti-perspirants can be applied to too wet hands. There are

many brands of these, often a powder or spray.



It can be wiped off after application and should work for

two or three hours.



It can be applied to hands or feet (for footplates).



If the TA then goes too high, use vanishing cream on top of it.





SUMMARY



While much work could be done still, the above is enough

for a practical result.





WARNING



Hi TAs and Lo TAs do not widely F/N. If you are getting

wide persistent F/N with the TA too high (above 3) or too

low (below 2) you have a pc whose hands are too dry or too wet.



Using this HCO B should correct it and in future sessions

you should continue the remedy on that pc.



NOTHING in this HCO B excuses the misreading or falsifying

of a TA. Get the TA in normal range with this HCO B before

you start calling processes ended.



C/S 53 RF and the False TA Checklist HCO B 29 Feb 1 972R,

Revised 23 Nov 73, are your tools for handling too high and

too low TAs.



The only other conditions I know of that make an auditor

mess up a pc's TA are: (a) A discharged meter (registers high).



(b) An incorrectly set meter by trim button.



(c) A "fleeting F/N" where the pc F/Ns so briefly the

auditor misses it and overruns.



(d) Bad TRs.



(e) Unflat processes.



(f) Overrun processes.



(g) Heavy drugs or medicines.



False TA often comes to light when the auditor runs out of

reasons it is high or low and it dawns on him that he is

dealing with false TA. In the latter case he should know

all MATERIALS ON THIS SUBJECT OF FALSE TA (given on HCO B

29 Feb 1972R, Revised 23 Nov 73, as references) AND REMEDY

THE FALSE TA SITUATION AND THEN RESUME NORMAL AUDITING. 

He must not go on calling high or low TA F/Ns just by 

assuming the TA is false.



Given a contact the meter always tells the truth.





L. RON HUBBARD

Founder



LRH:clb.rd 

Copyright c 1973

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



********



34. HCOB  21 OCT 68 Floating Needle





HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE



Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



HCO BULLETIN OF 21 OCTOBER 1968



Remimeo



FLOATING NEEDLE



Floating needles (F/Ns) are the end phenomena for any

process or action with the pc on two cans. It is one of the

most important rediscoveries made in years. It was known

but lost by auditors.



It is the idle uninfluenced movement of the needle on the

dial without any patterns or reactions in it. It can be as

small as 1" or as large as dial wide. It does not fall or

drop to the right of the dial. It moves to the left at the

same speed as it moves to the right. It is observed on a

Mark V E-Meter calibrated with the TA between 2.0 and 3.0

with GIs in on the pc. It can occur after a cognition

blowdown of the TA or just moves into floating. The pc may

or may not voice the cognition.



It, by the nature of the E-Meter reading below the

awareness of the thetan, occurs just before the pc is aware

of it. So to give a "That's it" on the occurrence of the

F/N can prevent the pc from getting the cognition.



A "floating needle" occurring above 3.0 or below 2.0 on a

calibrated Mark V E-Meter with the pc on 2 cans is an ARC

Broken Needle. Watch for the pc's indicators. An ARC Broken

Needle can occur between 2.0 and 3.0 where bad indicators

are apparent.



Pcs and pre-OTs OFTEN signal an F/N with a "POP" to the

left and the needle can actually even describe a pattern

much like a Rock Slam. Meters with lighter movements do

"pop" to the left and R/S wildly for a moment.



One does not sit and study and be sure of an "F/N". It

swings or pops, he lets the pc cognite and then indicates

the F/N to the pc preventing overrun.



When one OVERRUNS an F/N or misses one, the TA will start

to climb. The thing to do is briefly rehabilitate it (rehab

it) by indicating it has been by-passed and so regain it.



The F/N does not last very long in releasing. The thing to

do is end the process off NOW. Don't give another command.



It coincides with other "end phenomena" of processes but is

senior to them.



An F/N can be in normal range and still be an ARC Brk

Needle. The thing which determines a real F/N is Good

Indicators. Bad Indicators always accompany an ARC Break

Needle.



On an ARC Brk Needle, check for an ARC Brk. If the TA then

climbs, it was a real F/N so you rehab it quickly.



A one hand electrode sometimes obscures an F/N and gives

false TA. If used, use higher sensitivity and get the TA

from 2 cans when needed.



L. RON HUBBARD

Founder



LRH:ja.ei.cden 

Copyright c 1968 

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



********



35. HCOB  11 FEB 66 Free Needles, How To Get Them On a PC





HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE



Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



HCO BULLETIN OF 11 FEBRUARY 1966



Remimeo



All Students



All Scn Staff



Franchise



FREE NEEDLES, HOW TO



GET THEM ON A PC



Free needles can be obscured only by overruns and auditor

goofs in the rehab session and ARC Breaks in past auditing.



When a TA goes up or is up it means an overrun in life or

on a process or grade of release.



The only place you can't get an overrun is at Grade VII.

All grades below that are subject to overrun.



Life subjects are subject to overrun before Scientology.

The mechanism is this: one conceived a purpose. He or she

succeeded in it, then kept on and overran it. In auditing

one hits the purpose and the overrun of it and gets a free

needle on it. That doesn't mean the person was a release

then. It means that the spotting of the purpose and the

overrun by auditing produces a free needle today.



It may be necessary to find whole track overruns on some

pcs in rehabilitation of grades.



If a lot of levels have been run past free needle it may be

necessary to take apart the mess like a bundle of yarn to

get the first free needle. In such a case one rehabs any

grade the pc has been run on that the pc can remember. One

handles this briefly until the pc is happy but not

necessarily to free needle. One then finds another overrun,

does the same. One goes on and on looking for moments the

pc felt good about processing at one or another time. If

you keep this up, suddenly you will see a free needle on

the pc! Establish what grade it is free on, then quickly

get the needle free on the remaining overrun grades (but

not grades pc was never run on). It may be necessary to

take into account a whole track overrun of a purpose or

even the purpose to get release, clear or OT.



It is all very quick, deft auditing, very much on procedure

using standard rehab tech—but no repetitive grind.



--------------



You won't see a freeing up of a needle unless you set your

sensitivity on a Mark V to a stiff needle for the pc. You

can increase sensitivity or decrease it as the pc

progresses but by setting the sensitivity so the needle is

pretty still and stiff you will see easily a freeing up of

the needle and then a free needle. Using sensitivity 128

will obscure every free needle as the needle is too loose

already for the auditor to see any change.



--------------



Pcs are most apt to go free needle after a big cog. So

don't be so engrossed in looking at the pc during

cognitions. Keep an eye on that needle. And if it goes

free, don't ask anything else. Just gently give the pc a

"That's it" and without a chop of comm, ease the pc off to

"Declare?" in Qual. (Or if a field auditor, start the next

grade. )



--------------



Gently, gently, smooth TRs get you free needles.



A dirty needle is always caused by auditor chops, flubs,

etc. You can always trace a dirty needle right back to a TR

error by the auditor. If a needle goes dirty in a rehab

session, get the List 1 out right now and quickly find why.

It's always an auditor goof on the TRs or tech procedure.



--------------



Rehabs are not a substitute for processes. If a grade

hasn't been run, you can't rehab it of course.



In rehab, never use a new process to cure an overrun. Rehab

the process that was overrun, not new ruds.



And see HCO Pol Ltr 10 Feb 1966 on this subject.



---------------



You can get free needles on pcs. It just requires standard

TRs, standard tech, standard rehab and wanting to get one

and letting a pc have one.





L. RON HUBBARD



LRH:ml.rd

Copyright c 1966

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



********



36. HCOB  21 SEP 66 ARC Break Needle





HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE



Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



HCO BULLETIN OF 21 SEPTEMBER 1966



Remimeo



ARC BREAK NEEDLE



The needle of a preclear with an ARC Break may be dirty,

stuck or sticky, but may also give the appearance of

FLOATING. This is not a Release point however, as the pc

will be upset and out of comm at the same time. The auditor

must observe the preclear and determine which it is.



L. RON HUBBARD

Founder



LRH:lb-r.cden

Copyright © 1966

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



********



37. HCOB  20 FEB 70 Floating Needles and End Phenomena





HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE



Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



HCO BULLETIN OF 20 FEBRUARY 1970



Remimeo



Dn Checksheet



Class VIII



FLOATING NEEDLES AND END PHENOMENA



Now and then you will get a protest from preclears about

"floating needles".



The preclear feels there is more to be done yet the auditor

says, "Your needle is floating." This is sometimes so bad

that in Scientology Reviews one has to Prepcheck the

subject of "Floating Needles".



A lot of by-passed charge can be stirred up which ARC

Breaks (upsets) the preclear.



The reason this subject of floating needles gets into

trouble is that the auditor has not understood a subject

called END PHENOMENA.



END PHENOMENA is defined as "those indicators m the pc and

meter which show that a chain or process is ended". It

shows in Dianetics that basic on that chain and flow has

been erased, and in Scientology that the pc has been

released on that process being run. A new flow or a new

process can be embarked upon, of course, when the END

PHENOMENA of the previous process is attained.





DIANETICS



Floating needles are only ONE FOURTH OF THE END PHENOMENA

in all Dianetic auditing.



Any Dianetic auditing below Power has FOUR DEFINITE

REACTIONS IN THE PC WHICH SHOW THE PROCESS IS ENDED.



1. Floating needle.



2. Cognition.



3. Very good indicators (pc happy).



4. Erasure of the final picture audited.



Auditors get panicky about overrun. If you go past the End

Phenomena the F/N will pack up (cease) and the TA will rise.



BUT that's if you go past all four parts of the end

phenomena, not past a floating needle.



If you watch a needle with care and say nothing but your

R3R commands, as it begins to float you will find:



1. It starts to float narrowly.



2. The pc cognites (What do you know—so that's . . .) and

the float widens.



3. Very good indicators come in. And the float gets almost

full dial, and 4. The picture, if you inquired, has erased

and the needle goes full dial.



That is the full End Phenomena of Dianetics.



If the auditor sees a float start, as in 1, and says, "I

would like to indicate to you your needle is floating," he

can upset the pc's bank.



There is still charge. The pc has not been permitted to

cognite. VGIs surely won't appear and a piece of the

picture is left.



By being impetuous and fearful of overrun, or just being in

a hurry, the auditor's premature (too soon) indication to

the pc suppresses three quarters of the pc's end phenomena.





SCIENTOLOGY



All this also applies to Scientology auditing.



And all Scientology processes below Power have the same end

phenomena.



The 0 to IV Scientology End Phenomena are:



A. Floating needle.



B. Cognition.



C. Very good indicators.



D. Release.



The pc goes through these four steps without fail IF

PERMITTED TO DO SO.



As Scientology auditing is more delicate than Dianetic

auditing, an overrun (F/N vanished and TA rising, requiring

"rehab") can occur more rapidly. Thus the auditor has to be

more alert. But this is no excuse to chop off three of the

steps of end phenomena.



The same cycle of F/N will occur if the pc is given a

chance. On A you get a beginning F/N, on B slightly wider,

on C wider still and on D the needle really is floating and

widely.



"I would like to indicate to you your needle is floating"

can be a chop. Also it's a false report if it isn't widely

floating and will keep floating.



Pcs who leave session F/N and arrive at Examiner without

F/N, or who eventually do not come to session with an F/N

have been misaudited. The least visible way is the F/N

chop, as described in this session. The most obvious way is

to overrun the process. (Running a pc after he has

exteriorized will also give a high TA at Examiner.)



In Dianetics, one more pass through is often required to

get 1, 2, 3, 4 End Phenomena above.



I know it said in the Auditor's Code not to by-pass an F/N.

Perhaps it should be changed to read "A real wide F/N".

Here it's a question of how wide is an F/N? However, the

problem is NOT difficult.



I follow this rule—I never jolt or interrupt a pc who is

still looking inward. In other words, I don't ever yank his

attention over to the auditor. After all, it's his case we

are handling, not my actions as an auditor.



When I see an F/N begin I listen for the pc's cognition. If

it isn't there, I give the next command due. If it still

isn't there, I give the 2nd command, etc. Then I get the

cognition and shut up. The needle floats more widely, VGIs

come in, the F/N goes dial wide. The real skill is involved

in knowing when to say nothing more.



Then with the pc all bright, all end phenomena in sight

(F/N, Cog, VGIs, Erasure or Release, depending on whether

it's Dn or Scn), I say, as though agreeing with the pc,

"Your needle is floating."





DIANETIC ODDITY



Did you know that you could go through a picture half a

dozen times, the F/N getting wider and wider without the pc

cogniting? This is rare but it can happen once in a

hundred. The picture hasn't been erased yet. Bits of it

seem to keep popping in. Then it erases fully and wow, 2, 3

and 4 occur. This isn't grinding. It's waiting for the F/N

to broaden to cognition.



The pc who complains about F/Ns is really stating the wrong

problem. The actual problem was the auditor distracting the

pc from cognition by calling attention to himself and the

meter a moment too soon.



The pc who is still looking inward gets upset when his

attention is jerked outward.



Charge is then left in the area. A pc who has been denied

his full end phenomena too often will begin to refuse auditing.



Despite all this, one still must not overrun and get the TA

up. But in Dianetics an erasure leaves nothing to get the

TA up with!



The Scientology auditor has a harder problem with this, as

he can overrun more easily.



There is a chance of pulling the bank back in. So the

problem is more applicable to Scientology as a problem than

to Dianetics.



But ALL auditors must realize that the END PHENOMENA of

successful auditing is not just an F/N but has 3 more

requisites. And an auditor can chop these off.



The mark of the real VIRTUOSO (master) in auditing is his

skilled handling of the floating needle.



L. RON HUBBARD

Founder



LRH.jz.ei.rd

Copyright c 1970

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



********



38. HCOB   8 OCT 70 C/S Ser 20 Persistent F/N





HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE



Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



HCO BULLETIN OF 8 OCTOBER 1970



Remimeo

C/Ses

All Auditors

Level 0 C/S Series 20

HGC Checksheet





PERSISTENT F/N



A FLOATING NEEDLE can persist.



This fact tells you at once why you cannot do three major

actions in a row in the same ten minutes.



This was the bug behind "Quickie Grades" (0 to IV in one

session. This also occurred in Power when it was run all in

one day). The auditor would attain a bona fide full dial

F/N. The pc was still cogniting, still in a big win. The

auditor would "clear the next process command", he would

see an F/N. He would "clear the next process command", and

see an F/N.



BUT IT WAS THE SAME F/N!



Result was that processes 2 and 3 WERE NEVER RUN ON THE CASE.



This is really what is meant by "Quickie Grades".



In 1958 we got real Releases. You could not kill the F/N

for days, weeks.



Several processes had this effect. Today's real Clear also

goes this way. You couldn't kill the F/N with an axe.



By running a lot of Level Zero processes, for instance, you

can get a real swinging unkillable F/N.



It not only gets to the Examiner, it comes in at the start

of the next day's session! Now if in one session you ran

all of Level Zero and went on up to Level One, you would

just be auditing a persistent F/N. The pc would get no

benefit at all from Level One. He's still going "Wow" on

Level Zero.



If you ran Level Zero with one process that got a big wide

floating F/N and then "ran" Level I, II, III and IV, you

would have just a Level Zero Release. The pc's bank was

nowhere to be found. So next week he has problems (Level I)

or a Service Fac (Level IV) and he is only a Grade Zero yet

it says right there in Certs and Awards log he's a Grade

IV. So now we have a "Grade IV" who has Level I, II, III

and IV troubles!



A session that tries to go beyond a big dial-wide drifting

floating F/N only distracts the pc from his win. BIG WIN.



Any big win (F/N dial-wide, Cog, VGIs) gives you this kind

of persistent F/N.



You at least have to let it go until tomorrow and let the

pc have his win.



That is what is meant by letting the pc have his win. When

you get one of these dial-wide F/Ns, Cog, VGIs WOW you may

as well pack it up for the day.





GRADUAL WIDENING



In running a Dianetic chain to basic in triple you will

sometimes see in one session a half dial on Flow 1, 3/4 of

a dial on Flow 2, a full dial on Flow 3.



Or you may have 4 subjects to two-way comm or prepcheck in

one session. First action 1/3 dial F/N. Then no F/N, TA up.

Second action l/2 dial F/N. Then no F/N. Third action 3/4

dial F/N. Fourth action full dial-wide floating swinging

idling F/N.



You will also notice in the same session-long time for 1st

action, shorter, shorter, shorter for the next three actions.



Now you have an F/N that anything you try to clear and run

will just F/N WITHOUT AFFECTING THE CASE AT ALL.



If you audit past that you are wasting your time and processes.



You have hit an "unkillable F/N", properly called a

persistent F/N. It's persistent at least for that day. Do

any more and it's wasted.



If an auditor has never seen this he had better get his TR0

bullbait flat for 2 hours at one unflunked go and his other

TRs in and drill out his flubs. For that's what's supposed

to happen.



F/Ns on pcs audited up to (for that session) a persistent

F/N always get to the Examiner.



If you only have a "small F/N" it won't get to the

Examiner. However, on some pcs maybe that's good enough.

May take him several sessions, each one getting a final

session F/N a bit wider. Then he gets an F/N that gets to

the Examiner. After that, well audited on a continuing

basis, the F/N lasts longer and longer.



One day the pc comes into session with a dial-wide floating

swinging F/N and anything you say or do does nothing

whatever to disturb that F/N.



It's a real Release man. It may last weeks, months, years.



Tell him to come back when he feels he needs some auditing

and chalk up the remaining hours (if sold by the hour) as

undelivered. Or if sold by result, chalk up the result.



If the F/N is truly persistent he will have no objections.

If it isn't, he will object. So have him come back tomorrow

and carry on whatever you were doing.





SUMMARY



The technical bug back of Quickie Grades or Quickie Power

was the Persistent F/N.



This is not to be confused with a Stage 4 (sweep, stick,

sweep, stick) or an ARC Broke needle (pc Bad Indicators

while F/Ning).



This is not to be used to refuse all further auditing to a pc.



It is to be used to determine when to end a series of major

actions in a session.



L. RON HUBBARD

Founder



LRH: rr.rd 

Copyright c 1970 

by L. Ron Hubbard



ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



********



39. HCOB  21 MAR 74 End Phenomena





HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE



Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



HCO BULLETIN OF 21 MARCH 1974



Remimeo

AO Auditors

Class VIII





END PHENOMENA



(Ref: HCO B 20 Feb 1970, "Floating Needles and End Phenomena")



Different types of auditing call for different handlings of

End Phenomena.



End Phenomena will also vary depending on what you're running.



The definition of END PHENOMENA is "those indicators in the

pc and meter which show that a chain or process is ended".

Misapplication of this definition can result in underrun

and overrun processes or actions and the pc snarled up with

BPC.





TYPES OF EPs



In Power Processing the auditor waits for a specific EP and

does not indicate an F/N until he has gotten the specific

EP for the process. To miss on this in Power is disastrous,

thus Power auditors are drilled and drilled on the handling

of Power EPs.



In Dianetics, the EP of a chain is erasure, accompanied by

an F/N, cognition and good indicators. You wouldn't

necessarily expect rave indicators on a pc in the middle of

an assist, under emotional or physical stress until the

full assist was completed though. What you would expect is

the chain blown with an F/N. Those two things themselves

are good indicators. The cognition could simply be "the

chain blew".



In Scientology, End Phenomena vary with what you're

auditing. An ARC Broken pc on an L-1C will peel off charge

and come uptone gradually as each reading line is handled.



Sometimes it comes in a spectacular huge cog and VVGIs and

dial F/N, but that's usually after charge has been taken

off on a gradient. What's expected is an F/N as that charge

being handled moves off.



In Ruds it's the same idea. When you've got your F/N and

that charge has moved off, indicate it. Don't push the pc

on and on for some "EP". You've got it.



Now a major grade process will run to F/N, Cog, VGIs and

release. You'll have an ability regained. But that's a

grade process on a set up flying pc.





F/N ABUSE



Mistakenly applying the Power EP rule to Ruds will have the

pc messed up by overrun. It invalidates the pc's wins and

keys the charge back in. The pc will start thinking he

hasn't blown the charge and can't do anything about it.



In 1970 I had to write the HCO B "F/Ns and End Phenomena"

to cure auditors of chopping pc EPs on major actions by

indicating F/Ns too soon. This is one type of F/N abuse

which has largely been handled.



That bulletin and Power EP handling have been in some

instances misapplied in the direction of overrun. "The pc

isn't getting EP on these chains as there's no cognition,

just - it erased'," is one example. Obviously the C/S didn't

understand the definition of cognition or what an EP is.

Another example is the pc spots what it is and F/Ns and the

auditor carries on, expecting an "EP".





OTs AND EPs



An OT is particularly subject to F/N abuse as he can blow

things quite rapidly. If the auditor misses the F/N due to

too high a sensitivity setting or doesn't call it as he's

waiting for an "EP", overrun occurs. It invalidates an OT's

ability to as-is and causes severe upsets.



This error can also stem from auditor speed. The auditor,

used to auditing lower level pcs or never trained to audit

OTs, can't keep up with the OT and misses his F/Ns or reads.



Thus overruns occur and charged areas are bypassed.



This could account for those cases who were flying then

fell on their heads with the same problems that blew back

again.





REMEDY



The remedy of this problem begins with thoroughly clearing

all terms connected with EPs. This is basically Word

Clearing Method 6, Key Words.



The next action is to get my HCO Bs on the subject of EPs

and also related metering HCO Bs fully understood and

starrated. This would be followed by clay demos of various

EPs of processes and actions showing the mechanics of the

bank and what happens with the pc and meter.



TRs and meter drills on spotting F/Ns would follow,

including any needed obnosis drills and correction of meter

position so that the auditor could see the pc, meter and

his admin at a glance.



Then, the auditor would be gradiently drilled on handling

the pc, meter and admin at increasing rates of speed

including recognizing and indicating EPs when they

occurred. When the auditor could do all of this smoothly at

the high rate of speed of an OT blowing things by

inspection without fumbling, the last action would be

bullbaited drills like TRs 103 and 104, on a gradient to a

level of competence whereby the auditor could handle

anything that came up at speed and do so smoothly.



Then you'd really have an OT auditor. And that's what

you'll have to do to make them.



SUMMARY



Overrun and underrun alike mess up cases.



Both stem from an auditor inability to recognize and handle

different types of EPs and inexpertness in handling the

tools of auditing at speed.



Don't overrun pcs and have to repair them.



Let the pc have his wins.





L. RON HUBBARD

Founder



LRH:ams.rd 

Copyright c 1974 

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



********



40. HCOB  14 MAR 71R r. 25 JUL 73 F/N Everything





HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE



Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



HCO BULLETIN OF 14 MARCH 1971R



CORRECTED & REISSUED 25 JULY 1973



(Only change being word "by" in para 4 changed to "but".)



Remimeo

All Levels





F/N EVERYTHING



Whenever an auditor gets a read on an item from Ruds or a

prepared list (LIB, L3A, L4B, etc, etc) IT MUST BE CARRIED

TO AN F/N.



To fail to do so is to leave the pc with by-passed charge.



When a pc has had several reads on various lists which were

none of them carried to F/N, it can occur that he will

become upset or depressed without any other apparent

reason. As one has DONE the lists without F/Ning each item,

one now has the mystery of what is wrong? The error is

reading items from Ruds or prepared lists cleaned to no

read but not carried to F/N.



This action (amongst many such refinements) is what makes

Flag auditing so smooth and indeed makes it Flag Auditing.



When an auditor first tries this he may well think it is

impossible.



Yet it is simplicity itself. If you know bank structure you

know it is necessary to find an earlier item if something

does not release. What has been found as a read on a

prepared list would F/N if it were the basic lock. So if it

doesn't F/N, then there is an earlier (or an earlier or an

earlier) lock which is preventing it from F/Ning.



So the RULE:



NEVER WALK OFF FROM A READING ITEM ON A RUDIMENT OR A

PREPARED REPAIR LIST BEFORE YOU CARRY IT DOWN (EARLIER SIMILAR) 

TO AN F/N.



Example: ARC Brk reads. Pc says what it is, Auditor does

ARCU CDEI. If no F/N, Auditor asks for an earlier similar

ARC Brk, gets it, ARCU CDEI, etc until he gets an F/N.



Example: PTP reads. Carry it E/S (earlier similar) until a

PTP F/Ns.



Example: L4B: Has an item been denied you? Reads. Answered.

No F/N. Is there an earlier similar denied item? Answered.

F/N. Go on to next reading item on the list.



Example: GF assessed once through for reads. The next C/S

must take every item on it that read, by 2wc or other

process, to an F/N.



So there is a much more general rule:



EVERY ITEM THAT READS MUST F/N.



In Dianetics you get the F/N when you run E/S secondaries

or engrams to an erasure, F/N, Cog, VGIs.



In Rudiments, every out rud you get a read on is run E/S to F/N.



On a prepared list you take each read to an F/N or E/S to F/N.



On an LX list you run each flow chain to an F/N.



On GF you get by whatever process an F/N.



On Listing by the Laws of Listing and Nulling, your

eventual item listed must F/N.



So another rule:



EVERY MAJOR AND MINOR ACTION MUST BE CARRIED TO AN F/N.



There are NO exceptions.



Any exception leaves by-passed charge on the pc.



Also, every F/N is indicated at the conclusion of the

action when cog is obtained.



You take too soon an F/N (first twitch) you cut the

cognition and leave by-passed charge (a withheld cognition).



I could take any folder and simply write out the ruds and

prepared list reading items and then audit the pc and carry

each one to F/N and correct every list so disclosed and

wind up with a very shining, cool calm pc.



So "Have reading items been left charged?" would be a key

question on a case.



Using lists or ruds on high or low TAs that are not meant

for high or low TAs will get you reading items that won't F/N.



So, another rule:



NEVER TRY TO FLY RUDS OR DO L1B ON A HIGH OR LOW TA.



One can talk the TA down (see HCO B on Talking the TA Down).



Or one can assess L4B.



About the only prepared lists one can assess are the new

Hi-Lo TA HCO B 13 Mar 71 and possibly a GF+40 once through

for biggest read. The biggest read will have a blowdown on

it and can possibly be brought to F/N. If this occurs then

one also handles all other items that read.



The most frequent errors in all this are:



Not taking a read earlier similar but just checking it and

leaving it as "clean".



Not using suppress and false on items.



And of course leaving a pc thinking things are still

charged by failing to indicate the F/N.



Indicating an F/N before Cog.



Not going back through the folder to handle ruds and items

that read but were called "clean" or were simply abandoned.



A pc audited under tension of poor TRs has a hard time and

does not F/N sometimes, inviting overrun.



The rules then to happy pcs are:



GOOD TRs.



F/N EVERYTHING FOUND ON RUDS AND LISTS.



AUDIT WITH TA IN NORMAL RANGE OR REPAIR IT SO IT IS IN NORMAL

RANGE.





L. RON HUBBARD

Founder



LRH:mes.nt.rd

Copyright c 1971, 1973

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



********



41. HCOB  14 OCT 68 Meter Position





HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE



Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



HCO BULLETIN OF 14 OCTOBER 1968



Remimeo





METER POSITION





YOU MUST NEVER NEVER NEVER HAVE YOUR METER IN A POSITION

WHERE THE PRECLEAR CAN READ THE TA.



To do so can cause the pc worry about his TA position and

take his attention off his case.



It violates Clause 17 of the Auditor's Code.



L. RON HUBBARD

Founder



LRH :jp.ei.rd

Copyright c 1968

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



[Ed. Note: This HCOB is untitled in the 1974 pack and appears

on the checksheet in both packs as  "You must never never . . .".

The later pack has a copy with the "Meter Position" title

added but otherwise there is no difference.  Even the initials

line is the same]





********



42. BTB   14 JAN 63 Rings Causing "Rock Slams"





B O A R D T E C H N I C A L B U L L E T I N



14 JANUARY 1963

REISSUED 25 JULY 1974 AS BTB



CANCELS

HCO BULLETIN OF 14 JANUARY 1963

SAME TITLE





Remimeo 

All Auditors 





RINGS CAUSING "ROCK SLAMS"



NOTE: This datum was already known to me about rings but

this is the most severe case I've heard of.



L. RON HUBBARD



The following dispatch, sent in by Terry Milner and Joe

Fortner, staff members of Los Angeles, describes a

phenomenon which can be caused by a PC wearing rings: 



"A dispatch on a matter which I consider quite urgent. Since

being audited quite a few rock slams have been observed on

me. In the rudimentss, on lists, between comm lags, button

checks, in fact any method of auditing which required the

use of an E-Meter. With the advent of R2-12 I had many

lists, all chock full of items that had rock slammed at one

time or another.



The supposedly phantom rock slam served to hang up many

sessions and auditing became quite a drag even though one

true package was found in spite of the rock slams that went

on forever.



Recently I was sent to get HGC auditing and the rock slams

were ever present until my Auditor, Joe Fortner, got a

little suspicious and had me take off the two rings I wore,

one on either hand.



They disappeared. Hundreds of things that had rock slammed

no longer rock slammed.



Hundreds of almost, not quite reliable items are dead now

and in all truth, most them have no meaning to me anyway.



Perhaps you know of this condition set up by the PC wearing

rings.......the thing is most audititors do not, nor do

most PCs.



Revised by

Training & Services Aide



Approved by

L. RON HUBBARD

FOUNDER



for the

BOARDS OF DIRECTOTRS

of the

CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY



BDCS:LRH:RS:rs 

Copyright c 1963, 1974 

by L. Ron Hubbard 

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 



[Ed Note: The identical BTB in the 1974 pack has a different

signature which is -



Issued by Peter Hemery

Reissued as BTB

by Flag Mission 1234

I/C: CPO Andrea Lewis

2nd: Molly Harlow

Authorized by AVU



for the

BOARDS OF DIRECTOTRS

of the

CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY



BDCS:SW:AL:MH:TN:PH:mh 

Copyright c 1963, 1974 

by L. Ron Hubbard 

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 







********



43. HCOB   18 MAR 74 E-Meter Sensitivity Errors





HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE



Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



HCO BULLETIN OF 18 MARCH 1974



Remimeo



E-METERS



SENSITIVITY ERRORS



An auditor must set the Sensitivity of an E-Meter exactly

right for each pc.



The setting is different for almost every pc.





TOO LOW



Too low a Sensitivity on some pcs (like Sens 5-32) will

obscure reads and make them look like ticks. It will

obscure an F/N. Whereas a Sens 16-128 will show reads and F/Ns.



A pc can be hindered by the auditor not setting the

Sensitivity high enough to show reads and F/Ns. Items are

missed as well as F/Ns.





TOO HIGH



When auditing a flying pc or a Clear or OT the auditor who

sets the Sensitivity too high gets weird impressions of the

case.



"Latent reads" on such a case are common. They aren't

latent at all. What happens is that the F/N is more than a

dial wide at high Sensitivity and a started F/N looks like

a read as its sweep is stopped by the pin on the right of

the dial.



In this way uncharged items are taken up, the case is

slowed, overrun and general upsets requiring repairs occur.



On one hand electrode an OT VII sometimes has a 3/4 dial

wide F/N at Sens 5-32.



This would mean a 3/4 dial F/N at Sens 2-32 with two cans.



A Clear sometimes has a floating TA at Sens 32-32 instead

of an F/N. He would have to be run at Sens 3-32 two cans to

keep him on a dial or detect F/Ns.



This is a very important matter as the auditor will miss

F/Ns, think beginning F/Ns are reads and as the Pre-OT is

off the dial, miss reads.



Thus uncharged areas are run and charged ones are missed.



The result is very chaotic to repair.



Some lower level pcs also have a need for lower Sensitivity

settings.





SUMMARY



Sometimes an easy pc looks very difficult just because of

wrong Sensitivity settings.



Set the Sensitivity for the pc for a half dial F/N maximum

or minimum.



Don't get repairs.



Get wins.



L. RON HUBBARD

Founder



LRH:ntm.rd 

Copyright © 1974 

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



********



44. BTB   16 JUN 71R r. 22 JUL 74 Advanced E-Meter Drills





B O A R D T E C H N I C A L B U L L E T I N



16 JUNE 1971 R

ISSUE I

REVISED 30 MAY 1973

REISSUED 22 JULY 1974 AS BTB



CANCELS

HCO BULLETIN OF 16 JUNE 1971R

ISSUE II

SAME TITLE



Remimeo 

Cramming 





ADVANCED E- METER DRILLS



CROOOO-3



NAME: CONFRONT THE E- METER.



PURPOSE: To train an Auditor to confront an E-Meter.



POSITION: Student with E-Meter on a table in front of him.



COMMANDS: None.



TRAINING STRESS:



If a student has difficulty doing the preceding E-Meter

drills, this drill is done. It is a gradient step towards

greater session control!



The student confronts the E-Meter and does nothing else for

two hours. The Supervisor keeps a close eye on the student

and sees that he does the drill continuously for two hours.

If the student has difficulty, the Supervisor should get

him to clear up misunderstoods on the E-Meter and then

return him to the drill.



The drill is completed when the student has completed at

least two hours of the drill, and is doing it comfortably.



HISTORY: Developed by L. Ron Hubbard in 1971 at Flag to

provide a gradient for more difficult E-Meter Drills.





CROOOO-4



NAME: SEE THE SESSION.



PURPOSE: To train an Auditor to be able to see the PC, the

PC's hands on the cans, the Meter plus any reads, and the

worksheets without having to look at any one of them.



POSITION: Coach and Auditor on opposite sides of the table.

Table set up for a standard session.



COMMANDS:TRs 1 to 4 with admin (as per HCOB 16 August

71Training drills Modernised).



TRAINING STRESS:



The Auditor is trained to widen his/her field of vision

until the Auditor can see the Meter, the PC, the PC's hands

on the cans, and the worksheets effortlessly. The student is 

flunked for any weakness in earlier TRs, and returned to do 

them if needed. The student is flunked for a non-standard or

peculiar setting up of the equipment for a session which

may make it impossible to see the Meter, the PC and the

worksheets simultaneously. If the student is having

difficulty, the coach should handle the Auditor on a

gradient, ie see the Meter and the PC perfectly, then the

Meter and the worksheets and so bring the Auditor up to

doing the drill. The drill is passed when the Auditor can

do the drill effortlessly.



HISTORY: Developed in 1971 by L. Ron Hubbard to help

Auditors to gain smoother session co-ordination and control.





CROOOO-5



NAME: E- METER TRIM CHECK.



PURPOSE: To train an Auditor to be able to do a trim check

effortlessly in a session without distracting the PC in any

way.



POSITION: Coach and Auditor on opposite sides of the table.

Table set up for a standard session.



COMMANDS:TRs 1 to 4 patter.



TRAINING STRESS:



The Auditor is trained to do the steps of a trim check

while doing TRs 1 to 4 with admin until he can do a trim

check smoothly and efficiently, without the coach seeing

any movement or hearing any clicks or noises. The Auditor

is flunked for any hesitation, confusion, observable

movements or attention going onto the plug or trim knob.

The drill is ended when the Auditor can do the drill

silently and efficiently with his hands whilst doing TRs 1

to 4 with admin.



During any and all E-Meter Drills a copy of "E-Meter

Essentials" by L. Ron Hubbard should be handy.

Misunderstoods are



cleared up with the use of this handbook, and an extensive

use of Word Clearing technology is made.



These drills and any other Meter drills also need a copy of

"E-Meter Drills" to be on the table, and confusions on the

drill can often be traced back through this book.



The old rule that only constant reference to Source

maintains 100% results is to be adhered to on these drills

just as much. Verbal Q&A between coach and student is OUT.



HISTORY: Developed in 1971 by L.Ron Hubbard to help

Auditors to handle a trim check in session flawlessly.



Revised by

Training & Services Aide



Approved by

L. RON HUBBARD

FOUNDER



for the

BOARDS OF DIRECTOTRS

of the

CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY



BDCS:LRH:RS:rs 

Copyright © 1971, 1974 

by L. Ron Hubbard 

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 



[Ed Note: The 1974 pack has the identical BTB except that

the signature is different as follows -



CS-5

From and LRH Tape Lecture



Reissued as BTB

by Flag Mission 1234

IC: CPO Andrea Lewis

2nd: Molly Harlow

Authorized by AVU



for the

BOARDS OF DIRECTOTRS

of the

CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY



BDCS:SW:AL:MH:JZ:mh

Copyright c 1971, 1974 

by L. Ron Hubbard 

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 



********



45. HCOB  11 MAY 69 Meter Trim Check





HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE



Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



HCO BULLETIN OF 11 MAY 1969

(Tech Div) (Qual Div)

(Replaces HCO B of 27 July 1966, same name)



Remimeo

Exec Secs

Tech Sec 

All Tech Hats 

All Qual Hats

Dianetic Course





METER TRIM CHECK



E-Meters can go out of trim during a session because of

temperature changes.



Thus even if the meter is properly calibrated and reads at

2.0 with a 5,000 ohm resistor across the leads and 3.0 with

12,500 ohms, by the end of the session a pc can be

apparently reading below 2.0 because the meter is off trim.



The following meter procedure is therefore to be followed

AT THE END OF EACH SESSION (AFTER GIVING "THAT'S IT"):



1. DON'T MOVE THE TRIM KNOB



2. PULL OUT THE JACK PLUG



3. MOVE THE TA UNTIL THE NEEDLE IS ON "SET" AT THE

SENSITIVITY YOU WERE USING IN THE SESSION



4. RECORD THE TA POSITION AT THE BOTTOM OF THE AUDITOR'S

REPORT FORM AS: "Trim Check - TA = ..."



5. IF YOUR METER IS KNOWN TO BE OUT OF CALIBRATION (as in Para

2 above) RECORD ALSO: "Calibration error— on meter = 2.0

actual" at the bottom of the form.



L. RON HUBBARD

Founder



LRH:lb-r.cs.an.ei.rd 

copyright c 1969 

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



********



46. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 11 Metering





HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE



Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



HCO BULLETIN OF 23 MAY 1971

Issue IX

Basic Auditing Series 11



Remimeo 

Auditors

Supervisors

Students 

Tech and Qual Staff

Checksheets of all courses

teaching metering





METERING



One does NOT tell the pc anything about the meter or its

reads ever, except to indicate an F/N.



Steering a pc with "That—That—That" on something reading is

allowable. But that isn't putting attention on the meter

but on his bank.



Definition of "In Session" is "Pc interested in own case

and willing to talk to the auditor".



Saying "That reads", "That didn't read", "That blew down"

is illegal. It is no substitute for TR 2. It violates the

In Session definition by putting pc's attention on the

meter and can make him very unwilling to talk to the auditor!



L. RON HUBBARD

Founder



LRH:act.rd 

Copyright c 1971 

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



********



47. HCOB  10 DEC 65 E-Meter Drill Coaching





HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE



Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



HCO BULLETIN OF 10 DECEMBER 1965



Remimeo

Academy Tech Division

Students





E-METER DRILL COACHING



The following was submitted by Malcolm Cheminais,

Supervisor on the Saint Hill Special Briefing Course.



Here are some observations I have made on the coaching of

E-Meter drills, which I feel could be of use:



1. The coach's needle is dirty. The student's out comm

cycle has cut his comm in some way, but PRIOR to that the

coach failed to flunk the part of the comm cycle that went

out. Correct flunking by coaches equals students with no

dirty needles.



2. If a coach's TA starts climbing on a drill and the

needle gets sticky, it means that the student's comm cycle

has dispersed him and pushed him out of PT. The coach is

either ( 1 ) not flunking at all (2) flunking the incorrect

thing.



3. The correct flunking by the coach of an out comm cycle,

which has dispersed him and pushed his TA up, will always

result in a TA blowdown. If there is no blowdown, the coach

has flunked the wrong thing.



4. Needle not responding well and sensitively on assessment

drills, although the needle clean. Coach has failed to

flunk TR 1 (or TR0) for lack of impingement and reach.



5. Coach reaching forward and leaning on the table, means

TR 1 is out with the student.



6. Student asking coach for considerations to get TA down,

but TA climbing on the considerations—the coach is cleaning

a clean, instead of flunking the out comm cycle, which

occurred earlier and pushed his TA up.



7. Student getting coach's considerations off to clean the

needle, but needle remaining dirty—student is cutting the

coach's comm while getting the considerations off and the

coach is not picking this up.



8. Students shouting or talking very loudly on assessment

drills to try and get the Meter to read by overwhelm. The

reason for this is invariably—"but I'm assessing the bank!"

They haven't realized that banks don't read, only thetans

impinged upon by the bank—therefore the TR1 must be

addressed to the thetan. The meter responds proportionately

to the amount of ARC in the Session.



L. RON HUBBARD



LRH:emp.rd

Copyright c 1965

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



********



