A Freezone Bible Supporter



Here is a complete Level 0 Academy pack from the 1970s

being posted in 11 parts.  Contents below following the

FZ Bible mission statement.



Much Love,



Tech Lover





**************************************************



FREEZONE BIBLE MISSION STATEMENT



Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology

Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.



The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of

Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the

copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.



They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be

stamped out as heritics.  By their standards, all Christians, 

Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered

to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.



The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings

of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.



We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according

to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.



But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,

the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old 

testament regardless of any Jewish opinion.  



We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion

as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures

without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.



We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do

not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope

that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose

to aid us for that reason.



Thank You,



The FZ Bible Association



**************************************************





******** LEVEL ZERO ACADEMY COURSE PACK ********



Level 0 Academy Course Packs (2) circa 1974 and 1976,

Almost identical [Ed Note: differences noted like this]



Dark blue soft cardboard cover 

8 1/2 by 14 inch 4 hole punched & held together by 

double retainer clips. As issued by Pubs US.



This is complete including book excerpts but does not include

the complete book "Self Analysis" which is also part of the

level (it was posted to the internet last year).



This does not include transcripts of the level 0 tapes, but

we are working on those and will post them eventually.



Note that in the 1970s, HCOBs not written by Ron were converted

to BTBs (Board Technical Bulletins), resulting in the freequent

"reissued as BTB" designation.



Note that bulletins have a "distribution" near the top stating

where they are to be used.  A common distribution is "remimeo"

which means that the orgs may run copies on their mimeo machines.

Another, older, designation is "CenOcon" which means "Central

Orgs Continental".  Others such as "D of T" (director of training)

refer to posts in the Scientology organization.





********



CONTENTS:



part 1



01. BPL   26 JAN 72R  SCIENTOLOGY LEVEL 0 STANDARD ACADEMY CHECKSHEET

02. HCOPL  7 FEB 65 reiss. 15 JUN 70 Keeping Scientology Working

03. HCOPL 17 JUN 70 Technical Degrades

04. HCOB  11 JUN 64 New Student Data

05. HCOB  25 JUN 71R rev. 25 NOV 74 Barriers To Study

06. HCOPL 31 MAY 68 Auditors

07. BPL   17 MAY 71RA r.13 NOV 72 r.10 JUN 74 Study Points and Conditions

08. HCOPL 27 MAY 65 Processing



part 2



09. HCOPL 15 DEC 65 Student's Guide To Acceptable Behavior

10. HCOPL 14 FEB 65 Safeguarding Technology

11. HCOB  27 SEP 66 The Anti-Social Personality

12. HCOPL 22 NOV 67 Rev. 18 JUL 70 Out Tech

13. HCOPL  8 JUN 70 Student Auditing

14. BPL   25 JUN 70RA Expanded Lower Grades

15. HCOB  25 SEP 71RA rev 4 APR 74 Tone Scale In Full

16. BTB   20 JUL 74 Basic Auditing Drills

17. HCOPL 14 OCT 68R rev 1 JAN 76 The Auditor's Code



part 3



18. BTB    6 NOV 72R rev 25 JUL 74 Admin 14R The Worksheets

19. BTB    6 NOV 72R rev 27 AUG 74 Admin 13R The Auditor Report Form

20. BTB    6 NOV 72R rev 28 JUL 74 Admin 12R The Summary Report Form

21. BTB   20 JUN 70 reiss 21 JUL 74 Summary Report

22. BTB    6 NOV 72RA rev 20 NOV 74 Admin 11RA The Exam Report

23. HCOPL  8 MAR 71 Examiner's Form

24. BTB    5 NOV 72R rev 9 SEP 74 Admin 7R The Folder Summary

25. BTB   24 APR 69R rev 8 SEP 74 Preclear Assessment Sheet

26. HCOPL 23 APR 68 Parent or Guardian Assent Forms

27. HCOB  16 AUG 71 Training Drills Modernized



part 4



28. HCOB  24 OCT 71 False TA

29. HCOB  24 OCT 71 False TA Addition 

30. HCOB  15 FEB 72 False TA Addition 2

31. HCOB  18 FEB 72 False TA Addition 3

32. HCOB  29 FEB 72R rev 23 NOV 73 False TA Checklist

33. HCOB  23 NOV 73 Dry and Wet Hands Make False TA

34. HCOB  21 OCT 68 Floating Needle

35. HCOB  11 FEB 66 Free Needles, How To Get Them On a PC

36. HCOB  21 SEP 66 ARC Break Needle

37. HCOB  20 FEB 70 Floating Needles and End Phenomena

38. HCOB   8 OCT 70 C/S Ser 20 Persistent F/N

39. HCOB  21 MAR 74 End Phenomena

40. HCOB  14 MAR 71R r. 25 JUL 73 F/N Everything

41. HCOB  14 OCT 68 Meter Position

42. BTB   14 JAN 63 Rings Causing "Rock Slams"

43. HCOB  18 MAR 74 E-Meter Sensitivity Errors

44. BTB   16 JUN 71R r. 22 JUL 74 Advanced E-Meter Drills

45. HCOB  11 MAY 69 Meter Trim Check

46. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 11 Metering

47. HCOB  10 DEC 65 E-Meter Drill Coaching



part 5



48. HCOB   7 APR 64 Q And A

49. HCOB   3 AUG 65 Auditing Goofs Blowdown Interruption

50. HCOB   5 FEB 66 Letting The PC Itsa

51. HCOB   7 MAY 69 The Five GAEs

52. HCOB  17 MAY 69 TRs and Dirty Needles

53. BTB    4 JUL 69 r. 6 JUL 74 Auditing of OT 3 Preclears

54. BTB   17 JUL 69 r. 28 JUN 74 Flagrant Auditing Errors

55. HCOB  29 JUL 64 Good Indicators At Lower Levels

56. BTB   26 APR 69 r. 7 JUL 64 Bad Indicators

57. HCOPL  4 APR 72 rev. 7 APR 72 Ethics And Study Tech

58. HCOB  14 NOV 65 Clearing Commands

59. BTB    2 MAY 72R r. 10 JUN 74 Clearing Commands

60. BTB   18 NOV 68R r. 9 JUN 74 Model Session

61. HCOB  12 AUG 69 Flying Ruds

62. HCOB  23 AUG 71 (24 May 70 rev) Auditors Rights

63. HCOB   6 NOV 64 Styles of Auditing



part 6



64. HCOB  30 APR 71 Auditing Comm Cycle

65. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 2R The Two Parts Of Auditing

66. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 3 Three Important Comm Lines

67. HCOB  23 MAY 71R aud ser 4R Comm Cycles Within the Auditing Cycle

68. HCOB  23 MAY 71R aud ser 5R The Comm Cycles In Auditing



part 7



69. HCOB  12 JAN 59 Tone of Voice - Acknowledgement

70. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 6 Auditor Failure To Understand

71. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 7 Premature Acknowledgements

72. HCOPL  1 JUL 65 Comm Cycle Additives

73. HCOB  29 SEP 65 Cyclical and Non-Cyclical Processes

74. HCOB  17 MAR 74 TWC, Using Wrong Questions

75. BOOK  Dianetics 55 Chapter 12 The 6 Basic Processes



part 8



76. HCOB  16 FEB 59 Staff Auditor's Conference



part 9



77. HCOB  20 OCT 59 An Experimental Process

78. HCOB  16 FEB 59 HGC Processes for those trained in Engram Running

79. HCOB   8 APR 58 A Pair Of Processes

80. HCOB   9 MAR 60 Expansion of OT-3A Procedure, Step Two

81. HCOB  20 APR 60 Processes

82. HCOB  27 SEP 68 ARC Straight Wire

83. BTB    9 OCT 71RA r. 28 JUN 74 ARC Straightwire Drills

84. BTB   15 NOV 76 ARC Straightwire Quads

85. BOOK  Creation of Human Ability R2-31

86. PAB    8 JUL 55 PAB 56 Axiom 51 and Comm Processing



part 10



87. PAB   18 JUN 55 PAB 54 Reality Level of Preclear

88. HCOB  17 MAR 60 Standardized Sessions

89. HCOB   4 MAY 59 An Affinity Process

90. HCOB   2 MAR 61 New Pre-Hav Command

91. HCOB  25 SEP 59 HAS Co-Audit

92. HCOB  21 JUL 59 HGC Allowed Processes

93. BOOK   Creation of Human Ability R2-60

94. HCOB  13 OCT 59 D.E.I. Expanded Scale

95. HCOB   7 MAY 59 New Process Theory

96. BOOK   Scn 8-8008 6 Levels of Processing Issue 5

97. HCOB  11 DEC 64 Scientology 0 Processes

98. HCOB  26 DEC 64 Routine 0-A Expanded



part 11



99. BTB    9 OCT 71RA r. 29 JUL 74 Level 0 Drills

100. BTB  15 NOV 76 Grade Zero Processes - Quads



********



69. HCOB  12 JAN 59 Tone of Voice - Acknowledgement





HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

WASHINGTON, D.C.



HCO BULLETIN OF 12 JANUARY 1959



D of T

Acad Admin

Ext Course Dir 

Acad Insts

D of P

Processing Admin

HCO Bd of Renew

ACC World Wide Inst

HCO





TONE OF VOICE - ACKNOWLEDGEMENT



Mood can be expressed by an acknowledgement. Evaluation can

also be accomplished by acknowledgement, depending on the

tone of voice with which it is uttered.



There is nothing bad about expressing mood by acknowledgement, 

except when the acknowledgement expresses criticalness, 

ridicule, or humor.



L. RON HUBBARD



LRH:-jh 

Copyright c 1959

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



********



70. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 6 Auditor Failure To Understand





HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



HCO BULLETIN OF 23 MAY 1971

Issue VI



Remimeo

Auditors

Supervisors

Students 

Tech & Qual



HCOB of 17 Oct 1962, Reissued verbatim as

Basic Auditing Series 6





AUDITOR FAILURE TO UNDERSTAND



If a pc says something and the auditor fails to understand

what the pc said or meant, the correct response is:



"I did not (hear you) (understand what was said) (get that last)."



To do anything else is not only bad form, it can amount to

a heavy ARC Break.





INVALIDATION



To say "You did not speak loud enough____" or any other use

of "you" is an invalidation.



The pc is also thrown out of session by having

responsibility hung on him or her.



The Auditor is responsible for the session. Therefore the

auditor has to assume responsibility for all comm

breakdowns in it.





EVALUATION



Far more serious than Invalidation above, is the accidental

evaluation which may occur when the auditor repeats what

the pc said.



NEVER repeat anything a pc says after him, no matter why.



Repeating not only does not show the pc you heard but makes

him feel you're a circuit.



The highest advance of 19th Century Psychology was a

machine to drive people crazy.



All it did was repeat after the person everything the person said.



Children also do this to annoy.



But that isn't the main reason you do not repeat what the

pc said after the pc. If you say it wrong the pc is thrown

into heavy protest. The pc must correct the wrongness and

hangs up right there. It may take an hour to dig the pc out

of it.



Further, don't gesture to find out. To say, pointing, "You

mean this item, then," is not only an evaluation but a

nearly hypnotic command, and the pc feels he must reject

very strongly.



Don't tell the pc what the pc said and don't gesture to

find what the pc meant.



Just get the pc to say it again or get the pc to point it

out again. That's the correct action.





DRIVING IN ANCHOR POINTS



Also, do not shove things at a pc or throw things to a pc.

Don't gesture toward a pc. It drives in anchor points and

makes the pc reject the auditor.





ROCK SLAMMER



The reason a person who Rock Slams on Scientology or

auditors or the like can't audit well is that they are wary

of a pc and feel they must repeat after the pc, correct the

pc or gesture toward the pc.



But Rock Slammer or not, any new auditor may fall into

these bad habits and they should be broken fast.





SUMMARY



A very high percentage of ARC Breaks occur because of a

failure to understand the pc.



Don't prove you didn't with gestures or erroneous repeats.



Just audit, please.





L. RON HUBBARD

Founder



LRH:nt.rd

Copyright c 1962, 1971



by L. Ron Hubbard



ALL RIGHTS RESERVED





********



71. HCOB  23 MAY 71 aud ser 7 Premature Acknowledgements





HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE



Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



HCO BULLETIN OF 23 MAY 1971



HCOB of 7 Apr AD15, Reissued verbatim as

Basic Auditing Series 7



Issue VII

Remimeo

Supervisors 

Students

Tech & Qual





PREMATURE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS



Here's a new discovery. Imagine my making one on the Comm

Formula after all these years.



Do people ever explain to you long after you have understood?



Do people get cross with you when they are trying to tell

you something? If so, you are suffering from Premature

Acknowledgement.



Like body odor and bad breath, it is not conducive to

social happiness. But you don't use Lifebuoy soap or

Listerine to cure it, you use a proper comm formula.



When you "coax" a person to talk after he has begun with a

nod or a low "yes" you ack, make him forget, then make him

believe you haven't got it and then make him tell you at

GREAT length. He feels bad and doesn't cognite and may ARC

Break.



Try it out. Have somebody tell you about something and then

encourage before he has completely told you all.



THAT'S why pcs Itsa on and on and on and on with no gain.

The auditor prematurely acknowledged. THAT'S why pcs get

cross "for no reason". The auditor has prematurely and

unwittingly acknowledged. THAT'S why one feels dull when

talking to certain people. They prematurely acknowledge.

That's why one thinks another is stupid—that person

prematurely acknowledges.



The quickest way to become a social pariah (dog) is to

prematurely acknowledge. One can do it in many ways.



The quickest way to start the longest conversation is to

prematurely acknowledge for the person believes he has not

been understood and so begins to explain at greater and

greater length.



So this was the hidden ARC Break maker, the cognition

wrecker, the stupidifier, the Itsa prolonger in sessions.



And why some people believe others are stupid or don't understand.



Any habit of agreeable noises and nods can be mistaken for

acknowledgement, ends cycle on the speaker, causes him to

forget, feel dull, believe the listener is stupid, get

cross, get exhausted explaining and ARC Break. The missed

withhold is inadvertent. One didn't get a chance to say

what one was going to say because one was stopped by

premature acknowledgement. Result, missed w/h in the

speaker, with all its consequences.



This can be counted on to make you feel frightened of being

"agreeable with noises or gestures" for a bit and then

you'll get it straight.



What a piece of tech to remain incompletely explained. Fair

scares one it does. And in the Comm Formula too!



L. RON HUBBARD

Founder



LRH nt.rd 

Copyright c 1965, 1971 

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED





********



72. HCOPL  1 JUL 65 Comm Cycle Additives





HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



HCO POLICY LETTER OF 1 JULY 1965

Issue II



Remimeo

Tech Hats HCO Division

Qual Hats Tech Div

Qual Div





COMM CYCLE ADDITIVES





There are no additives permitted on the Auditing Comm Cycle.



Example: Getting the pc to state the problem after the pc

has said what the problem is.



Example: Asking a pc if that is the answer.



Example: Telling pc "it didn't react" on the meter.



Example: Querying the answer.



This is the WORST kind of auditing.



Processes run best MUZZLED. By muzzled is meant using ONLY

TR 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 by the text.



A pc's results will go to HELL on an additive comm cycle.



There are a hundred thousand tricks that could be added to

the Auditing Comm Cycle.



EVERY ONE of them is a GOOF.



The ONLY time you ever ask for a repeat is when you

couldn't hear it.



Since 1950, I've known that all auditors talk too much in a

session. The maximum talk is the standard model session and

the TR 0 to 4 Auditing Comm Cycle ONLY.



It is a serious matter to get a pc to "clarify his answer".

It is in fact an Ethics matter and if done habitually is a

Suppressive Act, for it will wipe out all gains. There are

mannerism additives also.



Example: Waiting for the pc to look at you before you give

the next command. (Pcs who won't look at you are ARC

Broken. You don't then twist this to mean the pc has to

look at you before you give the next command.)



Example: A lifted eyebrow at an answer.



Example: A questioning sort of ack.



The Whole Message is



GOOD AUDITING OCCURS WHEN THE COMM CYCLE ALONE IS USED AND IS

MUZZLED.



Additives on the Auditing Comm Cycle are ANY ACTION,

STATEMENT, QUESTION OR EXPRESSION GIVEN IN ADDITION TO 

TRs 0-4.



They are Gross Auditing Errors. And should be regarded as such.



Auditors who add to the Auditing Comm Cycle never make

Releases. So, that's Suppressive.



Don't do it!





L. RON HUBBARD



LRH:ml.cden 

Copyright c 1965

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED





********



73. HCOB  29 SEP 65 Cyclical and Non-Cyclical Processes





HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



HCO BULLETIN OF 29 SEPTEMBER 1965



Remimeo

All Students

Saint Hill Courses

All staff





CYCLICAL AND NON-CYCLICAL PROCESS



CONCLUSIONS



A Non-Cyclical Process (i.e. a repetitive process which

does not cause the preclear to cycle on the Time Track) is

concluded precisely as stated in HCO Bulletin 3 July 1 965.



A Cyclic Process—a repetitive process which does cause the

preclear to cycle on the Time Track as in Recall type

processes—must be concluded in Model Session as follows

"Where are you now on the Time Track?"



"I will continue this process until you are close to

present time." (After each command ask "When?") When the pc

is in PT, "That was the body of the session."



L. RON HUBBARD



LRH: ml.rd

Copyright c 1965

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED





********



74. HCOB  17 MAR 74 TWC, Using Wrong Questions



[Ed Note: The following was omitted from the 1976 pack but is

in the 1974 pack.  It is referenced on the checksheet]





HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

    Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex



HCO BULLETIN OF 17 MARCH 1974

Remimeo

TWC CHECKSHEETS

   TWC, USING WRONG QUESTIONS



Two Way Comm is not an art. It is a science which has exact rules.



Foremost in the rules is:



DON'T USE A LISTING QUESTION IN TWO WAY COMM.



By a "listing question" is meant any question which directly or

indirectly calls for items in the Pc's answer.



Use of "who", "what", "which" instantly turns a TWC into a listing

question.



Listing questions are governed by the rules of Listing and Nulling.



If you use a listing question accidentally in TWC you can get the same bad

reactions from a pc that you would get on a wrongly done list.



The reason for pc upsets in TWC is hidden as it is not apparently a

listing process, rarely gets the correction a bad list would get.



Asking "who" or "what" or "which" during a TWC after the main question can

also turn it into a Listing and Nulling process.



TWC questions MUST be limited to feelings, reactions, significances. They

must NEVER ask for terminals or locations.



EXAMPLE: "Who upset you?" in TWC causes the pc to give items. This is a

LIST. "What are you upset about?" does the same thing. "Which town were you

happiest in?" is also a LISTING question NOT a TWC question. Any of these

results in the pc giving items. They are not then nulled or correctly

indicated. The pc can get VERY upset just as he would with a wrong list. Yet

the session is not a "listing session" so never gets corrected.



EXAMPLE:  "How are you doing lately?" is an example of a correct TWC

question. It gets off charge and gets no list items. "Are you better these

days than you used to be?" "How have you been since the last session?"



"What happened" is different than "What illness", "What person", "What

town" which are listing questions.



REPAIR



When other things fail to locate the upset of a pc look into TWC

processes in the folder and treat them as L&N processes where the pc has

answered with items. The relief is magical.



L. RON HUBBARD

Founder

LRH: ntm.rd

Copyright $c 1974

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



********



75. BOOK  Dianetics 55 Chapter 12 The 6 Basic Processes





CHAPTER XII



THE SIX BASIC PROCESSES



Exerpt from the Book: Dianetics 55!



Today's auditor must be conversant with six Basic Processes

and must be able to get results with these processes before

he can expect to get results with higher levels of auditing.



These six processes form a roadway for more than the

auditor. We discover that they compose a tone-scale. This

tone-scale is as follows: at its lowest and highest

reaches, whether by mimicry, words, or mock-up, we have

two-way communication. Next above this, occupying a

position from about 1.1 to 1.8 on the Chart of Human

Evaluation as given in "Science of Survival," we have

Elementary Straightwire. Above this we have, from 1.8 to

2.5, Opening Procedure. Above this, from 2.6 to 3.0, we

have Opening Procedure by Duplication.



Above this we have Remedy of Havingness, from 3.1 to 3.5,

and above this, from 3.6 to 4.0, Spotting Spots in Space.



An auditor, in auditing these six basic processes, becomes

sufficiently capable in observing and communicating that he

can handle (or, can bring the preclear up to the point

where he can handle) the "subjective process" which

remedies communication, or the other one which is the

"One-Shot Clear."



The problem of psychosis never rightly belonged in

Dianetics but it has been solved there. Opening Procedure

of 8-C and the Mimicry techniques as given in the PABs

resolve psychosis. They resolve it rapidly and care for it

adequately, and we have no real worry on that score. The

only reason we would enter the field of psychosis at all

would be to find out how far South our techniques worked.



CHART OF PROCESSES



WHERE THEY ARE ON THE ARC TONE SCALE



Exteriorized



4.0



Spotting Spots in Space



3.6



3.5



Remedy of Havingness



3.1



3.0



Op. Pro. by Duplication



2.6



2.5



Opening Procedure 8-C



1.8



1.8



Elementary Straightwire



1.1



1.0



Two-Way Communication



-8.0



As covered much more fully in "The Creation of Human

Ability," available from the Hubbard Scientology

Organization, these Six Basic Processes form the background

to all processes. Through them we find two-way

communication everywhere. It can be said with honesty that

there is no auditing without two-way communication.



The process, Two-way Communication itself, could be

subdivided into verbal and non-verbal processes. The verbal

processes would include questions about the present time

environment and the preclear's life, interests, and so

forth, and would get a direct answer to every question, no

matter how long the communication lag was. In other words,

a two-way communication would be entered upon so as to

actually bring the preclear to talk to the auditor.



In the case of people who have great difficulties in this

line, we have non-verbal techniques such as Mimicry,

wherein the auditor mimics the preclear and persuades the

preclear to mimic the auditor. Various processes are used,

such as passing a ball back and forth between them,

nodding, shaking hands, sitting down, standing up, walking

across the room and back and sitting down, all of which are

effective.



Much of this book, "Dianetics 55!" is on the subject of

two-way communication, and the totality of auditing is

bringing a preclear into excellent two-way communication,

and it is conceived a little difficult by instructors to

relay the "process" called Two-way Communication.



However, it is actually simplicity itself, for all that is

necessary is to get the preclear to actually volunteer

communication and answer the communications volunteered to

him. There is always something the preclear will talk about.



Mimicry, particularly when used on psychotics, is a

precision subject. Mimicry is not a new process, it is

almost as old as psycho-therapy, but it is spotty when used

without an intimate knowledge of validation. It can be said

that that which one validates comes true. The only force or

strength Life has is that which derives directly from the

upper echelon of Understanding. When Life gets down to a

point where it is incomprehensible it cannot relay any

understanding.Understanding this is essential for an

auditor. He must realize that he gives power to everything

he validates. We made some thing important out of the

engram, and by validating engrams, we actually, where they

were audited poorly, gave force and power to engrams. Thus

it is with the psychotic. To mimic the strange, peculiar,

bizarre and unusual things he does is to give force and

strength to those things. It cannot be said with sufficient

emphasis that the auditor must never mimic the strange,

bizarre and unusual manifestations of the psychotic. The

only way that the auditor can make mimicry work

consistently and continually and rapidly, is by validating

what the environment considers the agreed-upon, the usual,

the routine, the ordinary. Perhaps the psychotic is

twisting his hands madly, and occasionally nodding

slightly. The auditor, to mimic him, would not twist his

hands, but would nod slightly, since a nod is the

agreed-upon manifestation in the environment, not the

twisting of hands. If the auditor does this, the preclear

will begin to nod more and twist his hands less. If the

auditor were to begin to mimic the psychotic by twisting

hands, he would discover that the psychotic would probably

stop twisting his hands, but would do something else more

bizarre. And if the auditor mimics this much more bizarre

thing, the psychotic will simply go on to something even

wilder or might become entirely motionless, for the one

fear the psychotic has is becoming predictable. The

psychotic is under the control of entities, demon-circuits.

He does have a grain of sanity present, otherwise he would

not be able to function at all. Therefore, those things

which he does which are sane must be mimicked and so

reinforced. If an auditor knows this thoroughly and

practices it smartly he will discover that psychotics can

be brought into two-way communication and moved immediately

into Opening Procedure of 8-C, the proper process for

psychotics. 8-C, while not a psychotic process, does work

on psychotics. However, in working Opening Procedure of 8-C

on the psychotic, the auditor must be very careful not to

go beyond part "a" for a long, long time.



From the process known as "Two-way Communication" we move

on to the process known as "Elementary Straightwire."

Elementary Straightwire has two basic commands. One of

these commands is used continually, over, and over, and

over, and over, until the communication lag is entirely

flat on it and then the other command is used over, and

over, and over until the communication lag is entirely

flat, at which time it will be discovered that the first

command will now give communication lag. And so it is used

over, and over, and over, and then the second one is used

over, and over, and over. In other words, what we do here

is to use this process of Elementary Straightwire with just

two commands, continually, one command at a time,

flattening each communication lag encountered. While one is

doing this, of course, one maintains two-way communication.

He acknowledges the fact that the preclear has recalled

something and is in general alert to receive from the

preclear an originated communication, answer it, and give

further orders. The two commands of Elementary Straightwire

are: "Give me something you wouldn't mind remembering,"

"Give me something you wouldn't mind forgetting." This can

be varied with: "Tell me something you wouldn't mind

remembering," "Tell me something you wouldn't mind

forgetting." This Elementary Straightwire is a standard

form. If it is varied it should be varied towards

simplicity. A simple form of straightwire is "Remember

something," over and over, again, and again, and again, and

again, and again. Do not use, however, "Forget something,"

since this is far too rough for the preclear. Another even

simpler form is to apply "Remember something" to the

Dynamics, such as "Remember a man," "Remember a group." The

only error that can be made in Elementary Straightwire is

to get too fancy, for one does not believe that an auditor

who has advanced this far in auditing would make an error

in communication. There is an entire gamut which we call

"The next to the last list in Self-Analysis" published in

the original edition of "Self-Analysis" which has many

times been known to break a person from a neurotic to a

sane state. This is: "Can you recall a time that is really

real to you?" "Can you recall a time when you were

communicating well to someone?" "Can you recall a time when

someone was communicating well to you?" "Can you recall a

time when you felt Affinity for someone?" "Can you recall a

time when someone felt Affinity for you?" By keeping this

in the Understanding or Affinity line a case advances more

rapidly than if mis-emotion and other factors are addressed.



Opening Procedure of 8-C is one of the most effective and

powerful processes ever developed and should be recognized

and used as such. The main error which is made in the

Opening Procedure of 8-C is not to do it long enough. It

takes about 15 hours of Opening Procedure of 8-C in order

to bring a person into a completely relaxed and

Self-Determined state of mind regarding orders. Opening

Procedure of 8-C is a precision process. Step "a" of

Opening Procedure of 8-C is "Do you see that object?" the

auditor pointing. When the preclear signifies that he does,

the auditor says, "Walk over to it." When the preclear has

walked over to it, the auditor says, "Touch it." When the

preclear does, the auditor says, "Let go," and designates

another object -- a wall, a lamp -- calls it by name or

not, and goes through the same procedure once more. It is

important that the auditor specifically acknowledge each

time the preclear has executed the command given. When the

preclear has seen the object, when he has walked over to

it, when he has touched it, when he has let go -- each time

the auditor signifies that he has perceived and does

acknowledge this action on the part of the preclear. This

Step "a" is used until the preclear does it easily,

smoothly, without the slightest variation or introduction

of any physical communication lag, and has demonstrated

completely that he has no upset feeling about the auditor

or objects in the room.



When "a" has been run for a length of time necessary to

bring the case up tone, Part "b" is run. Part "b"

introduces the idea of decision. It is notable that the

"One-Shot Clear" must be very strong on this power of

decision. It is also notable that a person in extremely bad

condition has no power of decision. The commands of Part

"b" are: "Pick a spot in this room," and when the preclear

has: "Walk over to it," and when the preclear does: "Put

your finger on it," and when the preclear has: "Let go."

Each time, the auditor acknowledges the completion of the

command by the preclear, signifying "All right," "O.K.," or

"Fine," making it very plain that he has noticed and

approves of and is acknowledging the preclear in following

each specific command. He approves of these one at a time

in this fashion. The preclear is run on this until 

he demonstrates no physical communication lag of

any kind in making up his mind what to touch, how to touch

it, and so forth.



Part "c" of Opening Procedure of 8-C introduces further

decision. It goes as follows: the auditor says, "Pick a

spot in this room," and when the preclear has, the auditor

says "Walk over to it." When the preclear does, the auditor

says, "Make up your mind when you are going to place your

finger on it, and do so." When the preclear has, the

auditor says, "Make up your mind when you are going to let

go, and let go." The auditor each time acknowledges the

completion of one of these orders to the preclear.



In doing Opening Procedure of 8-C the preclear must not be

permitted to execute a command before it is given, and a

two-way communication must be maintained. As I have said,

Opening Procedure of 8-C is a very powerful process. If all

auditors knew how to do this Opening Procedure of 8-C and

could do this very well, we would right there have

psycho-therapy licked. But we are not trying to lick

psycho-therapy. It has never been a major problem to us. We

are trying to bring people a long way further North than

psycho-therapy ever dreamed of, and Dianetics and

Scientology are not psycho-therapies, they are processes

which increase the abilities of people.



Opening Procedure by Duplication has as its goal the

separating of time, moment from moment. This is done by

getting a preclear to duplicate the same action over and

over again with two dissimilar objects. In England this

process is called "Book and Bottle," probably because these

two familiar objects are the most used in doing Opening

Procedure by Duplication.



The first step in Opening Procedure by Duplication is to

familiarize the preclear with beth objects, as to their

reality and his ability to own them. One makes himself

handle them, and feel them, and acquaint himself with them,

makes him describe them as objects he is experiencing in

present time, not as something related into the past. A

little time spent on this can be quite beneficial.



The auditor then begins what will become to the preclear

before he is through with this some of the most hated

phrases anyone could conceive, but which, by the time the

preclear is finished with this, become just like any other

phrases. Many people believe that opening Procedure by

Duplication induces hypnosis. This is because in running it

hypnotism runs off: the preclear, while the hypnotism is

running off, may feel quite hypnotized. It is the exact

reverse of hypnotism. Hypnotism is an effort to persuade

the individual to do nothing, to sit still, and to accept

fully the inflow. Opening Procedure by Duplication contains

two-way communication, and indeed does not work unless

two-way communication is done with it. The main liability

in doing two-way communication on Opening Procedure by

Duplication is that the auditor, in introducing two-way

communication to it, may stray considerably from the

pattern laid down. He must not do this. Although he is

maintaining two-way communication he must adhere very

sharply to the process. He can make the preclear tell more

about them, he can make the preclear describe various

things which are manifesting themselves to the preclear he

can be insistent the preclear really knows he has just

picked this up, but he must stay with this sequence of

auditing commands, and may not vary from them even vaguely.

He can interject other conversation, but not other auditing

commands, into Opening Procedure by Duplication.



The auditing commands are: "Do you see that book?" says the

auditor, pointing. When the preclear signifies that he has,

the auditor says, "Walk over to it." When the preclear

does, the auditor says, "Pick it up." When the preclear

does, the auditor says, "Look at it." When the preclear

does (usually he was looking at it but now looks at it more

closely) the auditor says, "Give me its color." When the

preclear does, the auditor says, "Give me its weight." When

the preclear does, the auditor says, "Give me its

temperature." When the preclear has, the auditor says, "Put

it back exactly as you found it." This action sequence

having been completed, the auditor points to the bottle.

"Do you see that bottle?" When the preclear does, the

auditor says, "Walk over to it." When the preclear does,

the auditor says, "Pick it up." When the preclear has, the

auditor says, "Look at it." When the preclear does, the

auditor says, "Give me its color." When the preclear has, 

the auditor says, "Give me its weight." When the 

preclear has, the auditor says, "Give me its temperature." 

When the preclear has, the auditor says, "Put it back 

exactly as you found it." Then the auditor says, pointing 

out the book, "Do you see that book?" and so on, back 

and forth, using this exact sequence of commands. 

The auditor can interject "Describe it more fully." 

The auditor can sometimes, but not oftener than

once every 15 minutes, point to the book, have the preclear

go through the full sequence with the book, and then point

to the book again, and have the preclear once more go

through the full sequence with the book. This will break

down the automatic machinery a preclear is bound to set up

to compensate for this process. We want to keep the

preclear doing it, not his machines. By asking the preclear

to describe the object, or describe its temperature more

fully in its proper sequence in these commands, machines

are also broken down and the alertness and the awareness of

the preclear is increased.



The auditor must not omit letting the preclear give him the

preclear's reaction. The preclear will pause, seem to be

confused. It is up to the auditor at that moment to say,

"What happened?" and to find out what happened, and then to

continue with the process, having acknowledged the

communication of the preclear. An auditor must never be

afraid to let a preclear emanate a communication, and an

auditor must never fail to acknowledge the completion of an

auditing action, no matter how minute.



The Remedy of Havingness is an extremely effective process

for it remedies the ability of the preclear to have or not

have at will. Sometimes auditors interpret this process as

inflow, only. That is because the physical universe is an

inflow universe, and it is all too easy for an auditor to

assign to auditing and all other actions inflow

characteristics only.



The modus operandi of the Remedy of Havingness is to have

the preclear mock up something, pull it in, or mock up

something and throw it away. It does not matter what you

have him mock up. The item can have significance or not as

the case may be. Preclears who are low in tone, if this is

run on them, have a tendency to make everything they mock

very significant. It is not the significance, it is the

mass that counts. However, to keep the preclear interested,

or to assist his mocking up, an auditor may designate

specific things, and does so.



It will be found that the acceptance level and expectance

level of the preclear very definitely monitor what he mocks

up, and what he can pull in and what he can throw away. As

covered in the Professional Auditor's Bulletins, acceptance

level processes can be combined with the Remedy of Havingness.



The commands of Remedy of Havingness are as follows: "Mock

up a (planet, man, brick)." "Make a copy of it." "Make a

copy of it." "Make a copy of it." And when the preclear has

from five to 15 copies, "Push them all together." "Now pull

them in on you." When the preclear has done this for some

time, the last command is varied by saying, "Throw them

away and have them disappear in the distance." In other

words, we have the preclear mock up something, and when he

has we have him make a copy of it, make another copy, and

another copy, and another copy, one at a time, push them

together and pull them in or throw them away.



We keep up this process for some time until we are very

certain that he can actually throw things away or pull them

in on himself at will. This is the Remedy of Havingness.



Remedy of Havingness does not mean stuffing the preclear

with energy. It means remedying his ability to have or not

have energy. Run with particular significances such as

money, women, et cetera, one could remedy specific

scarcities on the part of the preclear. But remember that

at first they may be so scarce that at first he may have to

waste a large quantity of them before he can have one.



On an awareness of awareness unit exteriorized we run

Remedy of Havingness, but a little differently. We say,

"Put up eight anchor points." We describe to him how we

want these put up. We want them put up in such a way as to

form the corners of a cube. In other words, these eight

anchor points are not put in a group in front of or behind

the preclear, they are to be distributed around him. 

When the preclear has done this we say, "Pull them into 

you." We keep this up for a long time.  We also have the 

preclear exteriorized mock up eight anchor points and 

send them away from him. A preclear exteriorized

can be very unhappy about his lack of havingness and this

last process is used to remedy this upset.



Remedy of Havingness is an exteriorization technique. If it

is run on an individual long enough, say eight or ten

hours, he will probably exteriorize at the end of that

time. If you kept on running it as an exteriorized process,

given in the second part above, he would then have his

visio clear up, and he would finally get into very

excellent condition. This is quite a process.



However, remember this process depends upon the preclear

following the auditor's orders.



Unless the auditor has guaranteed this by Opening Procedure

of 8-C and Opening Procedure by Duplication, the chances of

the preclear's actually following his orders (although

pretending to do so) are very slim. We discovered in

old-time Dianetics that the breakdown was in the preclear

failing to follow the auditor's orders. Preclears would

pretend to follow an auditor's orders but actually would not.



The process known as Spotting Spots in Space is not to be

attempted on somebody who is having a difficult time, and

when it is attempted it should be accompanied with Remedy

of Havingness. One makes a person spot spots in space for a

short time, then remedies Havingness, makes them spot spots

in space, then remedies Havingness, then spot spots in

space. These two processes, Remedying Havingness and Spot

Spots in Space actually belong together, however the

preclear eventually emerges up in a higher band where he

can spot spots in space without remedying Havingness.



The auditing commands are: "Spot a spot in the space of

this room." When the preclear has, the auditor says, "Spot

another spot," etc. When the preclear gets well into the

process in this fashion we say, "Spot a spot in the space

of this room." "Walk over to it," and when he has, "Put

your finger on it." When he does, "Let go."



The auditor should ask the preclear when he starts this

process if the spot has any mass, color, temperature, or

any other characteristics, or "How big is it?" The auditor

asks this to make sure that the preclear is actually

spotting a spot, a simple location, not a spot that has a

mass, temperature, or characteristics. A location is simply

a location, it does not have mass, it does not have color,

it does not have any temperature. When we ask the preclear

to spot a spot at first his spots are liable to have mass

and temperature. We do not object to this, we simply ask

him frequently, once we have discovered that his spots do

have this, how his spots are getting along, and we

remember, on such a preclear, that we must remedy havingness.



Eventually he will move out to a point where he is simply

spotting locations.



These are the Six Basic Processes that an auditor must

know. They are all of them very powerful processes, and

each and any one of them can accomplish the goals which

were envisioned in "Dianetics:The Modern Science of Mental

Health." The essence of these processes is to do them as

given, to do them "purely," all the while maintaining a

two-way communication with the preclear. Auditors get into

minor variations on this set of processes, but these

processes were evolved first in theory by myself, were

developed in practice by myself, and were then given to

many auditors to do, and many auditors were trained in

them, and then these processes were refined and inspected

until they represent a very broad agreement, and we have

found that these commands, as you have them here, are the

best commands which can be used in processing a preclear.

The failure of an auditor to duplicate, his unwillingness

to duplicate, his upset about duplication in general will

quite often lead him up the blind alley of varying a

process compulsively or obsessively. When he does he can

expect to lessen the results. Auditing today, by the

experience of a very large number of auditors, is a very

severe discipline on the individual. It is not an art, and

it never will be an art.



It is a precision science. In the old days, all this talk

about art and intuition and instinctiveness cost a lot of

preclears the benefit of auditing. Auditing in the long ago

was tremendously complicated but it was none the less

precise. Now that it is very simple it is still very precise.



Amongst these processes an understanding of communication

lag and Opening Procedure of 8-C were chose as the two

processes to be taught to a very large area which

contained a large number of auditors. This area had been

noteworthy, heretofore, for the strange results "obtained"

by auditors and the strange techniques which were used in

it. A couple of auditors were sent into this area to teach

everybody communication lag and Opening Procedure of 8-C.

Actually these two auditors were originally from this area.

They did so, and several lives have been reported saved to

date, and a great many cases have been salvaged, and the

entire science is looking up in that particular area simply

because the area was taught nothing but communication lag

and the Opening Procedure of 8-C and did nothing thereafter

but this. Out in the outskirts of this area a couple of

auditors varied Opening Procedure by Duplication and were

reported to be having very good luck with the variation,

but these two auditors were not part of the crew who were

taught Opening Procedure of 8-C and communication lag, and

the results they are obtaining are very junior to the

results obtained by their own fellows very close by.



It could be said that the only real danger in auditing was

failure. Auditing is the start, change and stop of

aberration, or the creation of ability. Today creation of

ability takes prominence to a point where aberration drops

out of sight and is forgotten. But the auditor who does not

obtain results is demonstrating to himself that he cannot

control human aberration and human ability, and a

demonstration of his failure to himself is sufficient to

make him slightly incapable in handling his own

difficulties. Thus it is a tremendously important thing

that we have processes which, when used exactly as given,

and used with skill, produce uniformly good results on

preclears. An auditor using these on preclears gets better,

and better, and better, and better even when he doesn't

have any auditing himself -- a thing which was not the

story in 1950. When you can control aberration in others,

when you can increase the ability of others, you certainly

do not worry about your own. An auditor who has consistent

failures will eventually drop back to self-auditing, but

these processes will cure even that. Self-auditing, of

course, is the manifestation of going around running

concepts or processes on one's self. One is doing this

because he has been made afraid, through his failure on

others, of his ability to control his own engrams,

facsimiles, thoughts and concepts, and he seeks to control

them through auditing. It is not necessary for an

individual to audit himself in order to control his own

machinery.



Before anyone should adventure in the direction of testing

the "One-Shot-Clear" or doing anything about exteriorizing

the awareness of awareness unit and so making a Clear, he

should be entirely conversant with these processes.

Actually, any of these processes run long enough would

probably result in an exteriorization. There are faster

ways to achieve an exteriorization than these processes,

but these processes are preliminary to them. The preclear

who cannot follow the auditor's orders will not sit there

and do a subjective -- which is to say, an out-of-sight, in

his own mind -- process without varying it. The trouble

with the preclear is that he cannot duplicate, he cannot

follow the orders of the auditor, and when the auditor

tells him to run a concept or a thought, the preclear

probably pays token nod to this and runs entirely something

else. A very close E-Meter review of a number of preclears

who were not advancing under "subjective processes"

disclosed that each and every one of them had never run

what the auditor told them to run. They were afraid of

obeying the auditor, they were afraid of what the auditor

was doing, they were afraid of his skill. Opening Procedure

of 8-C remedies this fear and brings the inability and

unwillingness of the preclear out into the open where it

belongs.



In Opening Procedure by Duplication we very often get a

preclear "blowing the session" where the auditor has run an

insufficient quantity of Opening Procedure of 8-C. When a

preclear "blows the session" on Opening Procedure by

Duplication, the auditor has missed.



He has not run enough Opening Procedure of 8-C. How much is

enough Opening Procedure of 8-C? Until the person is in

very good condition as homo sapiens.



Remember that whether the command is physical or mental,

the auditor must observe communication lag. In Opening

Procedure of 8-C he simply repeats the process command all

the way through, and then again, and again and again and in

such a way flattens any lag that shows up. He does not

repeat the command on which the preclear got the lag. It is

easier to do this way, it is a more orderly process when it

is done this way. By very close theory, the actual command

on which the preclear lagged should be repeated again, but

this is not done.



These are the six basic processes which we must know before

we can constitute ourselves auditors. These are the

processes which are getting results. These are the

processes which are making able men and able women.



These processes can be varied into specific uses where

ability is concerned. One of the uses of these, for

instance, would be to raise the ability of a pilot to fly a

plane, or a person to drive a car, simply by having him

approach, touch, and let go of various parts of the object

to be controlled. The exact procedure as given above of

Opening Procedure is run, except that the object to be

controlled is used. Typists have learned to type better,

people have learned to drive cars better, and many other

abilities have been recovered simply by running 8-C. One

could envision a pianist who was getting tired, run-down,

or upset by his music, coming into full awareness of it

once more simply by running 8-C on his instrument or

instruments.



If we wanted to increase the ability of a salesman, it

would only be necessary to run any of the above processes

in their proper position on the tone scale to increase his

ability. Abilities increase, in general, when these are run.



When does one run what process? One should have a copy of

the Chart of Human Evaluation from "Science of Survival"

and know that chart well in order to understand exactly

where one starts. In general practice, however, an auditor

simply starts with two-way communication, and when he is

getting answers to his questions and is taking rather

freely with his preclear he goes into Elementary

Straightwire, and from Elementary Straightwire he goes into

Opening Procedure of 8-C.



There is a variation on two-way communication. If you have

a difficulty in getting a preclear started in two-way

communication it is a very easy thing to get him talking on

problems, and from problems to run this one, "What problem

could you be to yourself?" "What problem could you be to

others?" running one and then the other each time until the

preclear understood he could be an infinity of problems.

Many people are so thoroughly scarce on problems that they

will not let any go until they know that they can create

problems for themselves. When a case is stalling, he is

generally finding it very hard to give up a pet problem

because he knows he can't have any more. Of course, all

this is basically situated on answers. He can't have any

answers so he has to have problems, then from problems he

finally gets to a point where he can't even have these.



Anyone desiring to be a good auditor should follow this

chapter very closely, should provide himself with a copy of

"The Creation of Human Ability," and should also procure

"Science of Survival" and study them. The best way to

become an auditor is to be trained as an auditor. We have

found this so much the case that while we offered an

examination to anyone who wished to take it to the grade of

Hubbard Certified Auditor, or Hubbard Dianetic Auditor, we

never expected them to pass it -- for they never had, even

though it was on the most simple elements as you see before

you. There is no substitute for good training.





******** 







