

**************************************************



SHSBC-392 14 JUL 64 TRACK AND BANK ANATOMY (confidential)



This tape is omitted from the SHSBC cassettes.



Transcript of Taped Lecture by L. Ron Hubbard

ShSpec 29  -   6407 C 14

(Renumbered SHSBC - 392)

July 14, 1964



 TRACK AND BANK ANATOMY



(applause)



Thank you! Very sorry to keep you waiting. It's not my

fault. It's Reg's clock (laugh). That's correct. It

said... it's wrong, so.... I'll have to turn on the clock

in me head. What's the date? (Audience: 14 July.) 14

July, the 14th - We have a new student, stand up and take

a bow - Tom Morgan And somebody we have seen before,

retreading - Jean Jacques Scalance.



Alright! I'll have to make up for it by being very

interesting having bored you to death sitting there ten or

fifteen minutes with nothing to do. Well, I think I'm just

going to give you right off the cuff, all of you right now,

a rundown on exactly what the track and bank looks like and

here at the lower levels particularly restimulated and

particularly the newcomer on the thing, why the best thing

to do is to turn it off is to just run on through Class VI.

That's the best way to turn all that restimulation off.

And.. (laughing) and, when you're Class VI, go right on

through to OT. That turns all the restimulation off

(laugh).



Now, let's just give you a very rapid fire lecture, and Reg

will be cursing in his beard because he'd want a camera on

this particularly, but I will do it all again with Fillips

and Furbelows. Very interesting doing things with

Furbelows (laugh), and here's the way it sits.



There's a thing called the reactive mind. The total

composition of the reactive mind consists of the following

factors: Are we away? (laugh) Alright, it has locks, it

has secondaries, it has engrams. Got that? Alright, in

addition to those locks, secondaries, and engrams, one of

the most notable facts that it has, which comes to view

once you start, is implants, implant GPMs and then various

forms and varieties and that sort of thing, and they make

little black masses that are quite interesting to collide

with, and they can be run on almost anybody, and actually

comprise, the implant GPM comprises Class V. Old Dianetics

dealt with the locks, secondaries, and engrams and Class V

deals with these implants and their various ramifications.



Implants are interesting in that they very often have

engrams in the midst of them. You run half an implant and

somebody slips off the post and something like that, he's

got an engram and somebody getting him back on the post.

You know, that kind of thing. In other words, there's all

of that still exists in the mind and that ... those, those

implants go along with dating, you can date implants very

easily, go along with other whole track phenomena. And,

there's two branches then to the whole track phenomena

which belongs at Class V, and one of those is implants and

the other one is engrams. And, various types of engrams go

back all the way along the track and there's some rather

unbelievable time spans involved in all this.



It goes very, very long. It ... You can get dates of

trillions to the one thousand three hundred power. That is

a date which you would spend the rest of your life writing.

That ... It's just, cyphers that go on and on and on. I'm

exaggerating when I say the rest of your life, but it would

just go on and on and on and on.



Now, because people have been implanted, and because

implants exist, and so forth, then it is very easy for

someone to get confused about what is called an actual GPM

and the actual reactive bank because he immediately

conceives that it has been done to him, and is all mixed up

on the situation, and he is very likely to believe that a..

an implant and a GPM are the same thing.



Now, if you want to become very ill, several methods of

becoming ill will be covered in today's lecture, if you

want to become very ill, indeed, why just start going

around and saying that actual GPMs are, are implants. If

that's... if you want to get sick, that is the best way I

know of to go about it, and if you want your pc to get good

and sick, why have your pc start arguing around about this

without you suddenly chipping in and saying, "now, when was

the first time you considered this?" You know, and just

run it out as a series of considerations right now, and

he'll come off of this wild kick because he's going to make

himself terribly ill if he says that actual GPMs are simply

implants. Now, we are not interested in whether they were

implanted or not implanted, I'm just telling you one

marvelous method of getting sick. You understand? I'm not

saying even what they are. I'm just saying that's a nice

way of getting sick.



Now, therefore, we get down to Class VI, and we've covered

everything else now except, of course, the fact that what

you're auditing up to Class IV is the destimulation of the

things you erase at Class V and VI. You want to know what

these Classes are all about. What Classes I to IV are

devoted to: auditing which destimulates those things which

are erased at Classes V and VI. You understand? Therefore,

there are only two erasure Classes and those are V and VI,

and there are four destimulation Classes. So, that you

never try to erase anything, actually it's quite incidental

but you really do get erasures accidentally of little odd

bits on Classes I to IV. There is a small amount of

erasure that does take place, but the moment the that the

auditor tries to erase something, while auditing in those

Classes with their processes, he is in immediate trouble.

I'll give you an of idea how this is.  I'll show you the

difference of Classes.



You say to somebody, you say, "You say you don't feel well,

alright, what's the matter?" "Oh, you got a headache,

alright, well now, recall the first time you ever tried to

get this headache cared for" "Recall an earlier time you

tried to get the headache cared for" is a more exact

command, because he won't give you the first time, the

first time. And, he gives you something, and gives you

something, and gives you something, and all of a sudden his

headache disappears. Well now, you've, you've

destimulated. You've destimulated.



Where's the headache? Well it actually isn't out there

lurking, waiting to pounce again, but if it comes back

slightly nobody should be very surprised, because having

done this exercise, of asking him for his considerations

about headaches, or what he's done for headaches, or how

headaches have been handled by him, and so forth, or what

he's done to a headache. We don't care what we ask him or

how we asked him for these considerations.



Don't get this mixed up with OW. I just heard crosswise in

your head that you had. No, it's any recall process, see,

which would lead to a banishment of a headache no matter

what you did, and then you found out that he had banged his

head on the corner of a kitchen sink at the age of five.

He got rid of his headache slightly, see, so then you decided

to really find out where this headache came from and you found

out that he was banging his head on the corner of the

kitchen sink and then you said, "Well now alright, about

banging your head on the corner of the kitchen sink when

you were five, how did the room look at that time?" "What

was said at that time?", and boy, he's got that headache

back with exclamation points. You understand?



Now, you've destimulated that same incident when you simply

asked him for some considerations. You destimulated in

general, the whole subject of headaches, but then you have

come back and try to erase this. You see? Now you're

gonna go through and scrub out what you have assigned the

cause of the headache to be.  You're going to erase that

thing and he's going to get a nice headache back. Now the

funny part of it is, you could go on through and erase it

only to find out that it really wasn't when he banged head

on the kitchen sink at the age of five. It was when he

fell out of the perambulator at the age of three. So, you

have now erased that and this would all be better, and then

you could find out that it wasn't that at all, but in his

last life time he was really shot in the head when he

kicked the bucket. So, that puts you back into the last

immediate past death. Now we're gonna run all this out

from one end to the other. I see some of you have been

over this road ... and there would be an astonishing return

of, of perception and he would feel pretty good about this,

and so forth.



But, either you did a terribly even nice smooth job of

auditing the whole way, and you could keep running this

back... Now, let me point out to you, that the second you

went into that past death you moved into Class V. It was

at that precise instant. It was perfectly alright to

handle banging his head on the corner of the sink in this

life time, you're, you're a perfectly good auditor, but you

moved out of Classes I to IV even on what little you can

erase in those Classes. See, you've moved out of that.

You've gone on to whole track. One more life time than

this one and you're on whole track and you're in Class V.

That's the way we classify it these days. Don't you see?



You got no business being there these days because of this

interesting fact. It is absolutely factual that an auditor,

smoothly auditing, can go back and erase enough of those

engrams, we did it in Dianetics, enough of those engrams to

make that headache go away and be good and the fellow not

bothered with it at all further more. This is perfectly

true but the number of incidents, I'm putting you all into

focus with regard to the reactive mind, the number of those

incidents which added up to a headache, may well be in the

billions, which is why we departed from Dianetic into

Scientology technology. And that's the exact reason why

there is a bridge between Dianetics into Scientology.



Whatever else anybody wants to assign to it, whether

historical reasons, or anything else, that is the great big

milestone on the road. The discovery that there could have

been billions of engrams on the track, each one of them

capable of causing a headache. And to get rid of all of

those engrams in times and terms of auditing, in view of

the fact that man is only here for seventy years at a

crack, to get rid of all those in a pc was not feasible.

It wasn't that the technology was not do-able, as a matter

of fact, we recently improved the technology. You could

run an engram now by plotting it's time, and spotting it's

duration, and boy, if you got those two right, pictures

turn up all in 3-D. This poor guy he's never had a picture

before in his life, see. You do that engram technique that

we developed here a year or so ago, I got, I finally got

whipped out, and so on, and boy, he's got visio and he's

got the lot, see. All you have to do is do an accurate

spotting of the time of the engram, find it's exact

duration, and move him up some place toward the beginning

of the thing and on go the lights, see, and you're away.



So, the big problem of erasing engrams, the pc had no visio

or sonic, that was dealt with and there is such a

technology, but it still doesn't solve this other auditing

factor. The auditing factor is, is billions of incidents

exist on the person's track which could cause a headache,

see. Let's say you've got a chronic headache, well also in

running this you find out he also has a chronic foot ache

and it has more billions, you see, so all of this becomes

infeasible. It is not do-able simply because the auditor

hasn't got enough time to handle that many incidents. It

is not, now, that they could not be handled, you

understand. But he hasn't got enough time to do it. You

could take this technology of erasing engrams and take

ninety-eight percent of your pcs and go ahead and run

engrams on those pcs with this technology and they would

very soon begin to fly.



But that is an erasure technique, and to achieve any finite

end within the lifetime of the pc and yourself, due to the

quantity involved, becomes impractical. That's why! And,

that's why the shift in Dianetics and Scientology and

that's why these other approaches. That's erasure! So,

erasure from I to IV, it is not that it couldn't be done,

it's that you haven't got time to do it, and you can do more

for the pc by destimulation that you're simply keying these

things out. In other words, park them over in their proper

area without paying too much attention to them. In other

words, the indirect approach to these billions of engrams

was simply to destimulate the pc on the subject of keying

them in, in this lifetime, and you find, quite remarkably,

that this is highly workable. Destimulation as opposed to

erasure.



Now, there is then the dividing line, between I to IV and V

to VI ... V and VI, is those early ones are, simply because

you can turn off somebody's headache and then if you don't

try to erase anything, that's what I've been trying to

teach you here, if you don't try to erase anything, if you

don't push him back into the bank and you don't crowd him

back into it with some nonsense or gobbledegook of some

kind or another. "Well, I didn't get that, would you go

over it again. That was a what? Well, I didn't quite

understand this, oh, it's a... well, it's alright." But

the auditor is just being too something or other.



He's concentrating the pc's attention on the backtrack,

see, and he says, "Oh well, that happened when you were

five, alright. What did you say you put your head up

against? Oh, your head hit, hit, hit a sink, alright. What

sink? Where were you living at that time?". Well, you've

done the exact approach that has long since been designed

on how to get somebody into an engram. And if... of

course, he'd go into the engram at that time, and your job

is actually to destimulate, not erase. You see that? Now,

oddly enough, you can still destimulate after you've done

all this.



You just pick this session. Now, you've obviously made

locks on the incident and this session. Don't you see?

So, you just ask him, "When was the first time we started

to talk about it in this session?", "What considerations

have you had about it in this session?" You go all over it

again, and magically, if you audited that very smoothly and

destimulated this session, why all of that would fly back

into the background again, and once more, he would be rid

of it.



So, we have two distinct classes of auditing and we have

two distinct things which are handled, and therefore all

auditing between I and IV is the handling of locks,

especially the lock known as a key-in. I won't bother to

go into nomenclature in this lecture. If you don't know

those words, look them up.



So, it's handling locks. So, I to IV isn't handling the raw

meat of life, and we have omitted number V because it now

isn't necessary, and this brings us vis-a-vis staring into

the lion's feted breath. That's VI. So, what you're doing

now is a transition from sweetness and light of one I to

IV.



   The spring sunlight pattering

   on the freshly born leaves,

   pan pipes trilling in the distance.

   The full volume Ride of the Valkyries,

   with no transition,

   done in a dark cave

   with red bloods and spots.



And if this is something of a shock to your steady factors,

well, fine. I would be very happy if it were possible to

put you through the two or three years of training

necessary to come up the whole gradient.



So, it's not necessary to come up to those whole years, so

the thing to do is just brace yourself for a shock, take it

on the chin, and plow on. You understand? So, actually

all of your auditing up to IV is destimulation, handling

the little key-ins and locks, "My momma spanked me and I

considered at that time, that I hated women", you know.

"Ah gee, somehow I feel suddenly better about, about....".

That's not what it's about, see. Do a military drum doing

muffled rums, and he's going off to the executioner's

block.



The somatics with confront required - pretty tall, pretty

tall. Big jump, big jump for a pc. Big jump for an

auditor. I just want to show you there's a section missing

in the training and tech, but it is possible for you to

make that jump and it is possible for the pc to make that

jump, without an awful lot of stuff, providing you do I to

IV well, and that's the area that you got to do well. Now,

what have you got to do in I to IV?  In I to IV you just

got to raise his cause level so when he eventually begins

to confront the real raw meat of the reactive mind, he can

as-is it. If he can't confront it, he can't as-is it. If

his willingness factor is too low, his cause factor is too

low. If his cause factor is too low, he can't look out

enough from where he is to as-is anything in front of him.

We've had other lectures on this particular subject. That

is not new ground.



So, your thing to do there is just raise up his cause level

- then throw him to the lions. Alright! It's something

like the Russians trained their troops for World War II.

They took this fellow and they showed him how to handle a

sub-machine gun, heel strip it, put it back together again,

fire it, and then sent him to the front lines. That was

his total military training, see. And then his survive

became soldiers. (laughing) So, this is heroic, see. No

effort being made at all to do anything very gradient about

this, and this brings us right down, with no more gradient

than that, to the reactive bank basic.



The basic raw meat of a reactive bank is the GPM. And the

GPM is caused of masses and significances, as you will find

in other materials, and has certain forms and sizes, and my

lecture mainly concerns it's patterns, here today.



Now, there are people around that tell you, "Naw, Ron must

be wrong, I've never seen any mass in GPMs - oops,

well.....mass...GPM ...(muttering) ... so I wonder why I'm

so hot". Well if you're running straight down instead of

the center of a GPM and you're running dead on, which you

can do now, of course you never see anything. The second

you begin to see anything, you must realize something has

been skipped. The only time anybody ever sees anything,

there's something wrong. You jumped a GPM. Well all of a

sudden you're gonna have visio. You jumped an item. Well,

you're gonna have nice visio on the item you jumped because

it's not going to be behind you, or ahead of you, or to the

left, or the right, or someplace. Do you see this?



Now, in the final analysis, a GPM is composed of mass and

significance, and it's located, and so forth, but you don't

have to worry about it being, too thoroughly, about it

being timed because it really doesn't matter what time it's

timed because it is timed. And one of the reasons why it's

very difficult to find the top of the bank or the bottom of

the bank and so forth, and that sort of thing, is because

it is time itself. So you try to find the top of the bank

and well, that would be the part which was made last. Yes,

how can there be a last when this is the thing which has

made it first and the last.



In other words, the characteristics which you normally

assign to objects in their position, location, and age,

these characteristics are gone when you get into GPMs.

Now, you can say, yes it runs in this order. Oh yes, it

does and you'd better run it in that order and you can say,

well it starts here and it goes there, and so forth. Well

that's simply, sort of on the basis, it's easiest to start

here and go there. Don't you see? Because there was no

start and there was no stop. But, there is a significance

of starting and stopping in it, and if it weren't for any

GPMs, there wouldn't be any significance of starting and

stopping. How do you like that? See?



The thing exists in space, but the GPM is what makes the

space for itself to exist in, see. It has age, but it,

itself, makes it's own age (chuckle). So, therefore we

say, this is the first end-Word. Well, we have said that

this is the first thing about the thing that makes a first,

you see. It wouldn't necessarily be a first engram. See,

there couldn't be a first End-Word, really. This is why

the wits are ... is very difficult to grasp at first glance

because you see everybody trying to grasp it is

tremendously influenced by it, and the considerations

people have of things are caused by these considerations

and significances which are in the GPMs. You see? It's a

snake eating up his own tail. It's that kind of a problem.

The snake ate himself up and disappeared. Well, that's

really what happens when you run a GPM.



Now if ... the consideration then, the consideration of

time, the consideration of space, energy, all the various

things of which a GPM is composed are contained as

significances in a GPM. Very, very puzzling. So, somebody

trying to understand life sitting down on a mountain top

some place in lower Jesus or some place, .. Jerusalem,

excuse me, and he's contemplating his navel or something,

and trying to get the hot dope, he gives you all sorts of

things. If he starts to get close to the truth, then the

things he utters appear to be idiocies, see. If he gets

close to the truth. Like, there really is no universe -

Mary Baker Eddy. There is no universe. All is infinite

mind. Isn't it true? It's very, very, very true but that

doesn't prevent Christian Science from being the leading

religious faith you find on the rosters of insane asylums.

See, it's a truth which isn't quite true enough to save the

bacon of the person's faith.



(continued in part 2)





 TRACK AND BANK ANATOMY



(continued from part 1)



Truth must be truth. It must be all the way truth. Now,

anybody who is studying slowly, and so forth, gets caught

up in this factor: That you can't go part way to truth.

The most suicidal activity that you can engage upon, is to

go part way to the truth. You've got to go all the way to the

truth. There are no half truths. About the most dangerous

thing you can have anything to do with is a half truth.

There are.. people have understood this, that a little

knowledge is dangerous. Well, that's actually not very well

applied, that's not even very well stated, and it certainly

isn't the same sense of what I'm saying here. No truth can

be half way approached. If you got that far and didn't go

any further, you would fall flat on your face and be in

quite a mess. If you set out to shoot the moon, there is

nothing sillier than going into perihelion around it for

the rest of your life (chuckle). You've got to land on the

moon. There is no substitute for totality with regard to

truth. In other words, you've got to know all of it.



And this is ... this I'm trying to field a philosophy. The

Bugdeammerbum.. the famous witch doctor from lower

Scrambula, he puts his foot on this line and he says,

"There really is no time" and he doesn't go any further

than that. He teaches everybody, there really is no time.

He's put himself and everybody around him with one foot on

the banana peel and the other in the grave, see. He hasn't

told them why there is no time, see. He hasn't told them

anything, and all he'll do is ... everybody goes around

saying, well there is no time, so it doesn't matter, but

yet, echoing in around in their skull is the fact that it's

true, there is no time. That is a truth, but it is so

little of the truth. Without somebody going the whole way,

it actually becomes quite dangerous. The whole race would

then simply go in apathy and that would be the end of it.



And that is what has happened in almost all philosophies

that I have ever heard of. See, they get some corner of

some truth and then they don't walk down that road and they

go no further than this. You see? And they sit around on

mountain tops regarding their navels and they do weird odd

ball things, and they wonder why they're not getting any

better if they know so much. Well, the reason they're not

getting any better, even though they know so much, is

because they started on the road to truth and they never

made the passage and they're something like a ship-wrecked

ship. They're high and dry on that reef and they're never

gonna go any further. But having gone that distance, it

wrecked them. Now this in itself is soul chilling.



This pronounces something quite interesting to you. You

can say, well we started into Scientology. Yeah, you

started on a road toward truth, didn't you? The only fatal

thing you can do, if you know this about your pcs, and you

know it about those around you, and you know it about some

of them fallen by the wayside, you instinctively feel it.



Having started, ceasing to go is one of the most fatal

things they could do. Now you look at this with some

sadness because it's actually a very fatal action. But let

me call to your attention something else. It isn't that

Scientology got you started on the road to truth. You

started on the road long time before. You've been on that

road ... When you sat down in the amphitheater, when you sat

down in the amphitheater in Greece and listened to somebody

saying philosophically, yippity yappishly, that something

is the end of the road and Kronos actually devours his own

children and therefore the whole universe is circular and

whatever else is being said. You started on the road to

truth and you can speculate along this particular direction:

what is the truth in this matter? What is the true composition

of this universe? What is my true identity? Who am I?

What do I consist of? Where do I come from?  Of course,

nearly everybody has asked that question of himself since

he's a little child. You started on the road to truth.

That's dangerous, unless you walk the whole road.



That road's got to be walked because the character of the

GPMs themselves admit of no halfway measures. You key in

of one of these GPMs, and you key in a series of GPMs, you

get them all roiled up and then you don't do anything about

them, you're in the soup.  They contain the end all of all

explanations. Contained in the GPMs are the explanation of

the universe in which we live. Their identity, everything

everything is composed of. The impetus. All of these very

things.



In other words, the philosopher busy philosophizing and

having himself a ball on the subject and coming up to some

conclusion. Let's take Einstein. Einstein was walking on

this road. He had finally gotten up to a point where he

was trying to integrate life into his other equations and

he was groping, groping, groping and he left one of the

most remarkable, he left one of the most thoroughly

remarkable messes for ages forward to figure out that you

ever cared to have anything to do with. When he died he

had a bunch of consultations. In other words, he was going

towards the everything of everything. In other words, he

was going towards something that explains everything, and

he hadn't arrived any closer than a bunch of symbols.

Having figured out his various equivalents of constants,

and speeds of light, matter, energy, space, and time,

having figured these out, he was trying to squeeze life

into this somehow or other, and he left an awful hodge

podge of figures which everybody worships back where he

was, Princeton I think it was... And they're busy trying

to do something with this now and it's all very complex

and it's all very something or other. In fact, everybody

around there is half way spinning, what the devil were these

last equations that Einstein wrote. He was just trying to

integrate life with the universe. That's, everybody would

say, an over simplification. No, it isn't, that's a more

truthful statement. That's closer to the truth than they

are. He was just trying to integrate life and the universe

and that and that. That's all.



The old Encyclopedia Britannica says in order to understand

space and time, you had better understand the mind because

it's very often, very possible, that space and time are

simply generated by the mind, how do we know. Interesting.

That's in the 1890 edition of Encyclopedia Britannica.

Marvelous insight. Very well put. I noticed it hasn't

been followed by anybody else. You notice that science

today says the mind is so in error, it is so inaccurate, is

so this, that it is just nothing in mechanics at all, but

mass is all and the mind is nothing, see. The universe is

everything, and the material things in existence are this

and then he is just a spontaneous combustion from mud, and

this is all he is, and he's just a lousy bum, and you talk

to one of these boys and their whole orientation is in this

direction. He will say, "Oh a computer, oh well a computer

never makes a mistake.  This is the run, it puts out all

these marvelous things, look at these marvelous things.

Human mind, agh, human being agh .... (muttering). Yeah,

listen to these boys. I've tried once in a while, timidly

for me, to say, "Who feeds the data to this computer?",

"What feeds the data to this computer, and get an answer

out of it and who inspects that answer after it has been

printed but the mind, the being, the person, the

individual." Yagh-yagh-yagh, they can't get this point at

all, see. In other words they've got now, the cake is more

important than the baker, see. You've got an end-all cake

that's self-generated and sprang spontaneously from the

cook pot, but no baker. The cake is greater than the

baker. Don't you see?



So, in studying R-6, the first thing we have to recognize

with vividness, is that we're dealing with the baker, not

the cake. We're dealing with the thing that makes it, not

the thing that is made. We've got to recognize that, and

that'll explain a great many failures auditors have when

they begin to approach R-6 and it's auditing techniques.

They pay all their attention to the mass, the GPM, the

significance, and to hell with the pc. Well in actual

fact, if you don't pay attention to the pc and his reaction

by keeping in a good auditing comm cycle, by doing good ARC

break assessments when you got by-passed charge, by first

and foremost taking care of the pc, by making absolutely

certain the pc doesn't have any PTPs at the time he's being

audited, making sure of all these little points, keeping

that pc in good communication, handling that very nicely,

making sure that all the items read, the pc is satisfied

that they have read, that the pc is cheerful and happy

about this, then you've just got an end-all cake, and you

got no baker. And it's the baker you're trying to handle

and it's the baker you'll be left with after the cake has

been et. So, you take good care of the baker. So a few

pieces of cake get chipped up. Well that's not very

important as long as you take care of the baker.



An individual is an individual and now you find this

inherent in early Scientology teachings where it was taught

more instinctively than factually, you see. It was taught

more on a basis of general knowingness. I knew how these

things were. You'll find that the being, the individual,

had generated the universe and part of that universe is the

GPM, and the GPM in it's generation then restrained him and

compelled him to covertly go on making the rest of the

universe unbeknownst to himself, and compelled him by his

own generation to go on making it, the GPM, see. So you're

not quite sure when you first look at this thing which way

is which. Is the cart drawing the horse or the horse

drawing the cart, you know. When you first look at it you

will say, "Wow - science, modern science has said, well,

it's all cake, and there's no baker", see.



Well let's take it up a little bit further. The first

trouble you're going to have and that is, is the course ...

is, is, is the cart being drawn by the horse or is the

horse being drawn by the cart, or who is running what, and

as the pc begins to look at this he actually can accept

intellectually, he's making this thing that is smacking his

face in but he can't put any part of it into actual

subjective reality. So it's a point you don't force down

his throat. It will eventually begin to dawn on him. He

gets to be further and further on a gradient of cause over

the GPM in spite of the fact that cause itself is an

end-Word.



The point is here, he gets to be, actually, more and more

cause over this GPM. See, everytime you're falling across a

real significant significance or something that is

absolutely necessary to do anything about anything with

you're also colliding, madly, with GPMs. You understand?

You're colliding with the meaningness of a GPM in some way,

shape, or form, in any human action, and in any part of or

action about this universe. It really doesn't matter much

what corner you approach of livingness or life in view of

the fact that livingness and life is created by the

individual through the GPM.



He creates the GPM and it creates it, but he's long since

forgotten he created the GPM. "It looks to me like"...,

you see, he would say, "it looks to me like the cake, you

know, is creatin' the rest of the kitchen." (chuckle) Why,

he will then not be able to very intelligently grasp the

fact that every time he tries to address any corner of

existence, he starts to feel strange or peculiar. Well

naturally, any corner of existence is already capped with a

GPM because if it wasn't, it wouldn't be there.



So, all of a sudden a guy is just thinking a thought, see,

thinking a thought at random. Alright, that is either a

lock on a Root-Word or a lock on an End-Word, see. One or

the other. It's a lock on a Root-Word or a lock on an

End-Word. That's it. I don't care what thought you just

thought, if you thought any at all, So you mustn't get

into some weird, you mustn't get into some weird odd-ball

contest of trying not to think in some way, in such a way

as not to restimulate a GPM. That doesn't happen to be

possible.



There's no particular reason for you ... I already went

over this rolley-coaster here a few weeks ago, it was a

relatively short time ago, I had to decide what this was

all about and I had to get down and work it all out very

carefully, and I did, you see, and that's the conclusion I

came to: That he built a universe through the formation of

a GPM and he couldn't think any thought to amount to

anything. But didn't amount to anything, he couldn't think

any thought that could impinge on one, one way or the

other. I made an actual test. It wasn't intentional.

It's with causation. I was telling you about cause level

and I had this struggle about trying to form a

communication about cause level, and I said, "Well I

don't ... " I knew that cause and so on, was an End-Word

in a GPM. We'll get on to what End Words are, and so forth,

in just a moment.



Well, I knew that it was an End Word and therefore I tried

to get around it by saying causation. Erase the causation

of a pc. And I tried to get around it also by using

causativeness, to increase the causativeness of a being.

And by the time I'd carefully written the bulletin, which

you have, carefully scouting this on causation and

causativeness, I was sick as a pup. It wasn't that I was

restraining anything, or anything, I was simply mis-wording

an End-Word. So I went back, I went back and scrubbed all

that and simply put cause down there well knowing that it

was an End-Word.



You don't want to keep repeating an End-Word at somebody

when you're giving them auditing commands. You can get out

to an outer perimeter lock. And that's what you want to

keep repeating, like "done". Well, that's very nice - done,

done, that's good. "What have you done?". That's good.

Withhold - no, that's a Root-Word because every time you

say withhold you're going to key-in directly and

immediately some other portion. You're gonna key-in

somebody faster than you're easing him up. Don't you see?

So, it's best in an auditing command to use an indirect

action. But in the discussion of communication of

anything, if you try to escape the significance of an

End-Word or the significance of a Root-Word, if you try to

escape these things and not mention them, all you do is

suppress them and the final result is, is you're

practically around the bend. So, the best answer is, the

hell with it. Say 'em. Do them. Not with a repetitive

auditing command. Not in a constant hammer pound of an

auditing command.



But a careful review shows that you can't escape this

particular thing and it shows, that when you're trying to

be technical, that a departure from the exact statement is

liable to make you sicker than an approach to the exact

statement. Then that says where you sit and where you

think. Now the number of Root-Words and End-Words which

you hear battered about every day, laid end to end, would

be longer than the Queen Elizabeth's passage from New York

to London. Every cocktail party on there, all they do is

bat about large numbers of Root-Words and End-Words.



Now, the worse off a person is, in actual fact, the more he

will talk in Root-Words and End-Words. Sanity, if it is

anything at all, would be the gradient scale of

destimulated Root-Words and End-Words, and insanity, would

be the command value of the Root-Words and End-Words over

the individual. Not their restimulation, but their command

value - that would be insanity. If Root-Words and

End-Words have a disproportionate command value over the

individual, you can say he's insane. Now that's ... That's

interesting too because insane, of course, is an End-Word.

But you have to step outside the basic considerations.



But quite in addition to adding both the universe and

personalities and reactions and so forth, the individual is

still quite capable of independent thought. And the reason

you have Dianetics and Scientology is totally attributable

to the fact that I've been walking, to a very marked

degree, outside the perimeter of reactive thought while

considering these various things. Now that's very

interesting. We got some place, you see, and didn't get

detoured into it even though we were dealing with and very

often using it.



Now take the very step with which you work - ARC. Affinity

is an End-Word - Reality is an End-Word - Communication is

an End-Word. There are three End-Words in a row, all the

way down early on the track and, theoretically, it should

make everybody sick as pups because it's so early. You

know, you destimulate the charge of them. Now, you're

living right in the middle of the fourth lightning if you

live in this universe and you're actually further from it

in Scientology than you are if you were out digging a ditch

somewhere because, believe me, that foreman when he comes

down the line is going to speak nothing but Root-Words and

End-Words. He's going to be pretty batty on the subject.



This little jazz musician, "Is that something!" "Boy

that's nowhere!" All in expletives. But they're ... you

get the idea? There's a vast difference here. They're

dead on dramatizing. They're completely unwitting. It

would be quite another thing for you, a Scientologist, to

be dead on wittingly. I know when I'm using Root Words and

when I'm using End Words to a very, very marked degree. If

I hadn't been aware of one before, if I ponder one too

hard, I'll get warm. When I notice that I'm getting rather

warm, I say, "Well what do you know, I wonder if that's a

Root Word, I wonder if that's an End-Word?" "Alright, it's

a Root Word. What do you know, must be a Root-Word

because it wouldn't add up any other way."



I found out that the resistance to and the flinch from

these things is what does the damage, not the use. That's

a very subtle point for you to know in Class VI. Very

subtile, so get that point down very well. It's the flinch

from, you see. It's the suppression of; it causes you to

feel dizzy and woggy and sick at your stomach. And

invalidation of, is what causes pain. Invalidation, of

course too, is an End-Word, but that causes pain. If you

want to make somebody hurt like crazy just get him to get

down, and say that it isn't true that there is a goal of

something or other, something or other, which is a real

goal, you see; or say it isn't true there is such an End

Word, and he's getting real excited about it, and the next

confounded thing you know, he'll feel like he's being sawed

up by a butcher's powered beef saw. What happened? Well,

the liabilities then are the liabilities of contest with

and dramatization of.



Contest with, is your greatest liability as a student.

Even though you're afraid of something you're still in

contest with it. It is that, and you are you. Afraid to

do these things. Walking the chalk line about them. Being

careful in consideration of them and those sort of things.

Well that's, that's where the damage comes. Then you say,

"Oh brother that's nowhere, that's really nowhere", you

know. "That's no..... I wonder what the hell I'm thinking

nowhere for, you know, what's all this nowhere. Tah, must

be an End Word. Ah, it's nowhere". You know, get the, get

the delicate shift here, see.



Alright, so you're gonna keep saying nowhere and make

yourself sick at the stomach and so forth and restimulate

the End-word "nowhere". Alright, that isn't going to worry

you until you suddenly realize you are saying "nowhere" and

to that degree dramatizing the thing, and then say you

mustn't because it is an End-Word. Now, you get that

subtle one? Because that's where you go over Niagara Falls

in a barrel. It's right at that point, see. You say,

"Well, I shouldn't be saying that because ...". Don't you

see?



Now, I've taken a new look at all this. So, you find out

after a conversation with somebody or other that you're

absolutely reeling. You've been talking about these things

and the room goes out of plumb, and so forth. So it does.

So what? Now, you really want to make it go out of plumb?

"Well I mustn't really discuss this anymore". Well, you've

knocked it all out of plumb with your locks. You see that?



Now, you find yourself dramatizing these things every once

in a while but it's only a sin not to eventually catch

yourself. I don't expect you not to dramatize them.

They're only still here, so you're dramatizing something

about space and matter, that's for sure, and time is

passing, so you must be dramatizing collectively, something

about time.



Alright! Well, let's figure this little other tiny nuance.

You all of a sudden find that you're sitting there saying,

"Tsk, problems, problems, problems, problems, now wait a

minute, I must have an End Word or something in

restimulation", see. Even though it's next week before you

find that out, see, and then not make the mistake of

saying, "Well, I mustn't say problems any more to myself",

see. Because the recognition of it is enough. You don't

have to prevent the future, because that's an End-Word too.

(laugh) So the gist of the situation is that you're

surrounded with these things and all you've done to date,

until you collide with them in study, is simply dramatize

them.



Now what's happening to you is you're finding out what

you've been dramatizing. Your face, every once in a while,

will be rather red on this subject. I, myself, pushed

myself away from an auditing session. Just very mildly

pushed myself from an auditing session and walked around

the room for a little while once, and I came back and I sat

down and I went over ... there wasn't anything wrong. I

was getting reads, everything was just fine. And I went

over everything under the sun, moon, and stars that I could

go over, and tried to compare everything that I had done

and everything I hadn't done and I was looking for this and

that and all of a sudden it occurred to me, I wonder what

I'm trying to do here. Why am I reviewing everything that

has happened here, you see. And then it suddenly struck me

that the next goal up that I was about to run was "To create

problems". I had simply been sitting there fearing

problems. I laughed at myself and ran the next pair. That

was the next one coming up. And I was - I was creating

problems - LIKE MAD. (laughing) You know what I mean?

You can't actually expect not to do it. If you didn't do

it, you wouldn't be part of the universe. Don't you see?



Your advance, is to some degree measured by your

recognition of what you, yourself, are doing. And a real

recognition comes about when you realize that you're making

these things up and of course about that time they will

cease to. Now there's a trap in all this of the tremendous

quantitativeness of them. There appear to be so many that

you become exhausted. The figures on this are variable.

There's a slight variation in these figures but the best

figures I have is 268 Roots and 268 End-Words. That makes

it square. There are 18 RIs in a GPM - proper line plot -

268 Root-Words in one series and 268 End-Words, or 268

serieses. Now if you multiply this one times the other,

you'll find then, there are in excess of 23,000 GPMs.



Now that, of course, is so staggering, there's such an

astonishing number that it makes you feel rather quivery on

a subject of, "I've got to audit all these out and it's

taking us a session, or in some cases it's taking us two

sessions to run out a GPM, and we're doing turn about type

auditing and I actually am only getting three sessions a

week and I'm running one and one half GPMs a week and there

are 23,000 of them to run out. So I can expect to be OT,

of course, at the end of, something on the order of 33,000

weeks, or something like this. And 33,000 weeks divided by

52 gives you the nu.... Oh my God!"



Well, of course, it's not the way it goes. This would be

good pedantic mathematics but it doesn't happen to be an

accurate situation. Once you've got your plot well oiled

in, you're spending less and less time in trying to find

your way down the bank. Don't you see? Once you've got

.. ninety percent of this work, by the way .. well I'm not

quite ... yes, I'd say ninety percent of the work has been

done on the organization of this. The consecutive adjacent

Goals and the consecutive adjacent End-Words are, are still

in a state of polish. They're mostly known, don't you see,

but they could be wiggled or wobbled to be here or be

there, or be something of the sort, don't you see, but the

trick was to get the pattern. Of course, the biggest trick

was to find out it was there at all. But to get the

pattern of this thing took me over a year and a half of

some of the wildest most troublesome stuff I have ever been

through. Very gruesome.



I look now on an auditor who can't find a few synonyms.

He's got one, he's got one to spit, you know. He can't

find the next goal which is to expectorate. I rather look

at this as being rather poor because the next goal to spit

is to, of course, - this is not a proper Root-Word - the

next goal to spit would of course be to expectorate, see.

It's to spit cats, the next goal is to expectorate cats,

you see, and the next goal to it would be to spitee cats.

Very imaginative. You've got "to run" is next to "to gallop",

you see. To travel fast, to speed. They're just all tied

together, the same word. Same word, and it's got to be

checked out and the best thing to do this with is one of

these New Rodell Word Finders. They're only available in

the United States and they're very, very fancy. They've

had a lot of college professors working on the thing and

they were nicely keyed-in and they practically laid the

bank out in this thing unwittingly and unknowingly and you

look up a list of synonyms, brother it will find the next

door cousin in most of the cases.



(continued in part 3)





 TRACK AND BANK ANATOMY



(continued from part 2)



What gives you trouble is you sometimes have prepositions

and conjunctions in the goal. Usually just prepositions

and you have to bend your wits around a little bit. You

get a goal like - this is not a proper one but I'll just

give you a form - "to run away from cats", see.



So what is the basic, the basic rundown here is the

pattern. The pattern has been found and that is the most

important part of any of this, is the pattern, because, you

see, there could have been trillions of patterns possible.

The bank is so charged. It is so full of locks that almost

anything runs, almost anything reads. It's the woof and

warp of life. You can walk your way through to what is the

central pattern of all this, - forms auditing research

papers which if stacked up here on this platform, would

reach from the very far end of that platform to a height of

about two feet, or three feet, all the way over to the

other end of the platform. Just single sheets of paper,

notes and records of running possible combinations. And it

is actually quite agonizing to run these things backwards

and upside down and wreck yourself like a fire drill. So,

it's very difficult to find this pattern. You're being

punished all the time for trying to find the right pattern.

Don't you see?



There is no half way road to truth. Don't you see? A GPM,

of which you have all of the items, which is properly

worded, and so forth, runs like hot butter, providing you

haven't skipped too many, or something. That's, that's

that easy. But the GPM of which you have one word missing,

or one preposition missing, runs with pure agony, see.

This is no good. You have to be dead on. We're getting us

to a point where we could be dead on, but it's very

difficult, and that bridge has been very well crossed and

we're very glad to be back. The listing the auditors are

being asked to do at the present moment is just sign the

adjacent consecutive GPM wording, see, that he's got there.



Now, they don't vary. Everybody has the same pattern.

They all start in the same place and they all end in the

same place and they all have the same wording. Some people

have some holes in the track, however, where ages past they

have tried to chew up a GPM and get free. And there'll be

little holes, where just half of a GPM here and there is

badly chewed up, and your most greatest liability there is

running into an ARC break that occurred maybe thirteen

trillion years ago. The greatest liability is the ARC

break with the bank thirteen thousand years ago.



You all of a sudden are running down the track - this is

rather rare but I'm just telling you what the score is -

You get half way through this thing, the GPM, everything's

running fine and all of a sudden it's all running bad and

you wonder what's going on and you trace it up and the guy

is looking at this or that and he can see things and he's

upset about something or other and you find out that

thirteen trillion years ago in an enthusiastic ambitious

moment he decided to ... he found this one, to bite this

one in half, and tried to do something about it and chew it

up and of course, he had the wrong goal and the wrong

items.



Sometimes you get a read on an ARC break assessment

- wrong goal, wrong item and you find out it was in

yesteryear they were a wrong goal, wrong item. It had

nothing to do with your auditing. It was some little self

auditing this boy had done thirteen trillion years ago or

more. You got the idea? You occasionally run into this.

So, you've been trying to buck these things for a long

time. Of course, in several thousand of them there's maybe

one half of one GPM chewed up, so this doesn't compose much

of a problem but you can run into them.



So people have been at it and trying to do things about

these things for a long time. They haven't gotten any

place, they've gotten themselves stuck in trying to list

something without a meter and without auditing discipline

and without knowing the pattern, and so forth. They just

pull in a lot of End-Words on themselves and they've been

unhappy ever since. The most recent incident I know of was

about 139 years ago, sitting on the side of Mount Pernasus,

cussin' these dam things. Messed them all up, pulled them

all out of sequence, just cussin' them. Finally saw that

there were these masses so I couldn't see the escape from

the masses, so I couldn't properly exteriorize. I started

cussin' them.



You'll find out this sort of thing has occurred. A person,

of course, gets into this state. He doesn't know what

these are, he doesn't know what they're all about. He

doesn't know what they're composed of and he's already been

bit two or three times when he's collided with these things

so he doesn't want to know too much about them. Well, he

has to know them dead right before they are completely

painless and safe to live with. You have to go the whole

road to truth.



Now, they are very, very simple in essence, the whole

pattern is extremely simple. I can tell you in a very

brief space of time. I'll write it down here. A Root word

.. let's, let's, let's be happy about the thing, the

End-Word, although it sometimes doesn't sound very normal,

is always a noun and a Root-Word is always a verb of some

kind or another. So, we've got something like this. We've

got a complete GPM and this is what you know as own Goal

and that sort of thing. Let's go over this. And, it's To

Eat Cats. Let's, let's get this now. To Eat Cats. We

notice here that we are on the end of this thing - Cats -

and that is an End-Word, and because that is an End-Word,

there are going to be 268, or there abouts, GPMs all ending

in Cats in a row. You may not be at the beginning of it,

you may not be at the end of it but you know that they're

all in a row. There's 268 Root Words which end in Cats and

they're all consecutive and in sequence, see. We got, to

eat Cats - to dine on Cats, you see - to consume Cats - to

digest Cats, it'll probably be your next type of thing.

Just a tiny bit of shift, you see, goes from eat to digest,

and there's gonna be three like to digest Cats, you see.



But they're all gonna be Cats, Cats, Cats, Cats and it's

gonna be out there for 268 GPMs. Now a GPM consists of 18

RIs. Those RIs in 2 rows of 9 in each row and they begin

with the Goal as an RI at the bottom and they run on

to the top. And I'm not gonna bother to tell you the line

plot right now, but the line plot is posted in the theory

room. 18 RIs in this line plot and one of the main

difficulties you get into, is the line plot is itself and

the End-Words are themselves and the Root-Words are

themselves and they don't much cross. So, if you had in

the line plot Edible Cats, which we don't have, you see,

but if you had in the basic line plot Edible blanks, see,

you would then get, To Eat Cats would read as a Goal,

because it reads off the line plot as a lock.



But it would check out as a lock if you're smart and clever

and work hard and ask several times. Most of the reasons

you fail to check is you ... you fail on checking, you

don't ask the second time, you don't ask what it is and you

don't ask where it is. Ask if you've missed anything - you

don't add that to your checkouts and that's when you miss

on a checkout and then you find out there's four hundred

and sixty-five dozen reasons why you shouldn't have run

that GPM that you were busy running, but you, you just

didn't ask the question. So, of course, now the pc's in

trouble and so forth. It wasn't consecutive, it was

improperly worded.



"Is this an actual Goal?", you ask; you get a read.

Well if you get a read once, the pc might have just

breathed, you see, hard or he might have had a heat

wave hitting at that particular moment, or something

like that. So, one read, oh puff. One read, phooey. You

don't buy anything on one read. The question is, can you

make it read again. Then you say, "Is this a correctly

worded actual GPM?" Sometimes you got some knuckle-headed

pc that insists, well you found out once, why should you be

asking again. You find out that all of your repeat

questions, and so forth, are being suppressed. So, you just

have to handle that as an auditing problem. He's got

duplication, or something like that, stuck as an End-Word.

Don't you see? He doesn't want any duplication in his

vicinity.



So, what's this, what's this Cats? That's a ... an

End-Word, that's an End-Word. There are approximately,

apparently, 268 of these things and they go plus - minus.

And it would be something like - Cats and Catlessnesses -

or something like that, see, or it would be something

opposite to Cats. We don't much care what's opposite to

Cats. It's what is opposite to Cats that would appear on

the end plot. But it's something that's definitely opposed

- not, not dogs, you understand. Dogs as a beingness is

opposed to Cats. No, this is, this is the End-Word. But

it would be an absence of Cats. Don't you see? The

End-Word isn't an absence of Cats, but that's what the

End-Word would mean and you would express something like -

Catlessness - or something, you see. It's the opposite and

.. but what makes it difficult, is that it's only the

End-Words which go positive - negative and that gets very

confusing and that's very upsetting, but they go plus -

minus in groups.



Now if you have something to do with positions or

locations, and so forth, this just runs on endlessly.

You've got all kinds of pluses and minuses with regard to,

to positions and locations. And since the most assessable,

accessable End-Words that you will collide with on a pc,

the most ... the best End-Words you collide with on a pc,

are according to what I've seen anyway, is HERE. H-E-R-E -

not plural, but H-E-R-E - and that, of course, has just

above it - THERE - which is the opposite to HERE. Don't

you see? And those are your pair of actuals, and go this

way.



Now, there's these 268 of these End-Words and they go to

the middle of track and then the sequence of plus and minus

reverses on the word - NOW - which is in the middle of

track. Here's the beginning of track, up this end, if you

wanna have this end. It's at this end, and NOW is in the

middle of the track and the PRESENT is at the furthest end

of the track. Now the present just beyond it has the

ABSENT. That makes life more interesting. You'd never

find anything. HERE has several more toward PT but they

all have to do with this kind of thing, you see. Most of

them do ... have to do with this kind of thing, they're

plus and minus. But, what I'm trying to show you is, that

the middle of track of NOW has got an earlier on one side

and a later on the other side of it, so it's actually

used twice as a positive, which switches the order, which

switches the order of positive - negative. So that BEFORE

pair to this NOW, the earlier half of the End-Word series.

Just don't consider anything but this End-Word, see.



The earlier half of this End-Word series has the negative

further away from the top of the bank. The negative is

further away from the top of the bank, and the positive is

nearer the top of the bank, by one, you see. But the NOW,

up here to here, the negative ... this causes tremendous

grief, that's why I didn't find it at first ... the

negative is closer to the top of the bank than the

positive. The positive is further away from the top of the

bank. You understand? In other words, they do a switch

because the center End-Word uses a double. It's double

used positive. NOW, you see, has two negatives. So, if

you work that out, you'll see that's very simple, that's

very simple if you just write down plus as the middle of

the track and then minus closer to PT and then a minus

further from PT and then alternate pluses and minuses both

directions. Then you'll find out that, of course, the

first half of the track is opposite the other half of the

track as far as the plus - minuses are concerned. You got

that? Alright!



That is the way the End-Words lie and what's difficult

about it, particularly difficult about it, is the fact that

the track is really basically circular. But, you'll find

out that there is a thing which answers up to being the top

of the bank and you can get the pc into a lot of trouble if

you run the "quote" beginning of the bank before you run

this end of the bank. You understand me now? But there

really isn't any. You got it? For some particular reason

when time was finally plowed into it, and so forth, why

HERE operates as top, or first thing to run. NOW, of

course, operates as the middle of the bank. Something you

won't get to until you're half done, and the PRESENT is the

last thing you will run out. And, of course, those three

things tend to lock up on each other which keep the bank

with you all the time.  Adroit, isn't it?  And, of

course, you don't find these negatives because of the

obvious. See, you found HERE so, of course, you don't have

THERE, see. Then you get things like EVERYWHERE and

ELSEWHERE, see. That's another pair. So, it's pretty hard

to navigate through these End-Words if you don't know the

pattern.



But that is the pattern of these End-Words and it's, it's

pretty easy to do. It's a positive - negative proposition.

There is no numerical repeats. It doesn't go twenty-one

earlier as the negative, or so forth, that trick isn't

there. It's just ... it's common just as I've given it to

you. It's rather ordinary. You could sketch it out on a

piece of paper. There's just middle of the track and the

negative on each side of that plus word, comes on out to

the ends and, of course, there's half of 268 End-Words

this way from NOW and half of them the other way from NOW.

So, it's elementary. Then they they tend to curve around

and lock up and it makes the track look truncated at Goals

because Goals, that's the big obsessive one, see. And it

makes the track look truncated at that point, and the track

will answer up as truncated and is runnable at that point

but it isn't necessary to run it that way, see.



It doesn't really matter a cotton pickin', confounded,

doggone where you run any of this as long as you don't run

it blind. In other words you say, "We're running the

fifteenth End-Word in sequence from the top of the bank"

and telling the pc that it IS the top of the bank will turn

on a somatic because you've misplaced it. Don't you see?

Because that restimulates placement and you get the somatic

from placement. Don't you see? But if you just sawed into

it and then you found out how many End-Words there were

above it, and you said, "Well, we're running the fifteenth

End-Word", the pc would say, "Alright" and you go on and

run it and you do run it. You got the idea? It's nice to

run it all in order but if you can't run it all in order,

don't run it blind. Know what you're missing, see. Know

what you're missing in order to run it.



So anyway, the net gain of that is, that is the pattern of

the End-Words and then these are the Root-Words - TO EAT -

EAT here we call the second word, just for lack of

something because it's needed in the line plot as the

second word, and the TO is just gratuitous, but TO EAT, you

see, TO EAT is the Root, what we call the Root. And we did

say Root-Word. Who cares whether we use Word or not, see.

That's the Root and there's 268 of these Roots and you get

one End-Word, it's got 268 Roots. Pocketa-pocketa-pocketa-pocketa,

268 Roots. And they all go in the same order and they have

the same sequence of Roots and they're in the same consecutive

order for every End-Word. So if you've got CATS, you got

these same 268 words for CATS. If you've got DOGS it's the

same 268 words in that same exact order for dogs, don't you see.



This makes all kinds of interesting mathematical

computations and so forth. You can take any random End-Word

almost and add these Root-Words to it and it sounds very,

very significant indeed. You see that? So, there's always

this same sequence of Roots. Always the same, and that is

the same 268, see. The only thing that changes then in

essence ... a series is this 268 Roots with one End-Word,

and the only thing that really changes in GPMs then, since

the line plot is the same for every GPM, all 23,000 plus,

or whatever the figure is, well, the only thing that ever

changes in the GPM is the End-Word, and that only changes

every 268 Roots. So, it's a sort of slow freight, see,

slow shift.



Now, the line plot is the independent items which fit TO

EAT CATS. Now we've gotten it down to TO EAT CATS and that

itself is a little bunch of mass and significance which is

composed of 18 separate items, two columns of 9 each which

are in opposition to each other and bring each other about.

And those 18 items, each one ALWAYS has the same form and

it changes just with the Goal you are using. So if you had

.. just as a ... an incorrect example but nevertheless an

example of it, you have EDIBLE BLANKS, see, why in the line

plot, why this simply transposes into EDIBLE CATS. If you

had an End-Word, ELSEWHERE, it would be EDIBLE ELSEWHERES.

It would become plural if it's not already plural as an

End-Word. The plurals are all taken care of in this. It's

not difficult. So you have EDIBLE ELSEWHERES, see. And

this line plot simply repeats in every one of the 23,000

GPMs.



It's just a substitution, you know, of what Goal it does

have itself and it's always the same, and it's always in

the same sequence, and it always comes together that way,

and it brings each other about, and locks each other in.

And that line plot is so composed as to lock together GPM A

and GPM B. In other words, GPM B is expressed in GPM A's

bottom pair and in GPM B the bottom items of GPM A are

expressed in it's top pair. In other words, these are

nicely intermingling.



So we have an item at the top and an item at the bottom

which directly refer to the adjacent GPM, see. So that's

what keeps it, keeps it gripped together, see. And then

those End-Words in sequence, they don't really grip

together beyond shutting off from one and getting the

idea, the next one and approaching it, and that's where

they grip together. It's a sort of travel thing, see.

A guy decides for GPM after GPM, "well we're gonna

leave here now, we're gonna shove off, we're gonna

skip it, we're gonna get out of here, we're gonna depart;

yeah, I better, I better, I better scram", and so forth and

then eventually, magnitudinously thinks of the next one and

it's first GPMs are just getting the idea there might be

another one and considering this for a while and pondering

and looking at it for a while, and deciding he would do

something toward it and then approaching it and then

getting near it and then eventually walking around, and

arriving at it. You get the idea? And eventually he's

there and there might be some trick interlocked between

them, but ... I wouldn't rule it out totally, but I haven't

found one. I've just found these two adjacent GPMs go

smoothly together. That is entirely, the total pattern of

the bank. There is nothing more in the reactive bank than

that.



These things run by the discipline of Scientology and you

have to take very good care of the baker because the

baker's making all this, and you never have to run out

23,000 GPMs for the excellent reason, sooner or later he's

going to cognite he's doing it, and that's the end of it.



He can give you a false cognition that he's doing it and

still have his head knocked off by the masses. He can sit

back and decide to decide he's doing it, you see, so

therefore, it'll all go away. Won't do him any good. It

happens when it happens, not before. And actually it's a

pretty long, gruesome, arduous run and it's run today by

platens. It can be run easily by platens. Nothing to it.

Just cut pieces of cardboard with the pattern of the GPM

written on the tops of the cardboard and just fill in one

word. Cut 'em out with a razor blade. And a platen is an

L-shaped hole. Nine L-shaped holes in series, with the ...

your bottom part of the hole is what you write your data

in. You just put 'em on an 8 x 13 sheet of paper and you

don't even have to write all items. You go

pocketa-pocketa-pocketa. When you first start in, you

better write out the items.



But there's the, there's the whole composition of the

track, there's the GPM, the auditing technology which

runs it. It's very, very smooth auditing and draws it

to an exact drain of charge of each one of these things

in turn and the charge goes away very fast. Usually in

one or two big reads and you position it one way or

the other and eventually, why, you get in your X step.

It's very rapid and frankly, running with a platen

and so forth, you can dispense with one of these things

about one a minute. If you got up to one a minute, and so

forth, that's 23,000 minutes to OT, at the absolute outside

because you never get to the 23,000 minutes. Sooner or

later the guy's gonna say, well the hell with that, I'm

making it all up. At that point he's gotta fly out of his

body and straighten up the auditing room chairs by taking

him out of his state.



But don't let anybody get away with the idea, "Well I

realize I'm causing all these ..caugh,caugh.. things and...

you'll see that, by the way, that'll be very frequent. I

know, I know people. So any how.  Know 'em and love 'em,

live with them, and straighten them out for the various

reasons, but they do have their foibles, and they will

crowd it (garbled). They will push it, they will get

anxious.



Alright! And that is the total composition of the bank.

And there isn't anything else in the bank that you need to

worry about because there isn't anything else in the bank

because all engrams, locks, secondaries, and this is why we

don't run them, implants and all other such bric-a-bracs,

theta traps, all the rest of these things. Of course,

they're all sitting as locks on the GPMs. Now you say,

well we can expect to go on and find the GPMs, they're

sitting on locks someplace. Yes, they're sitting ...

they're all locks, on a thing called a Thetan.



Thank you very much.



           ******************************



(end of lecture)



