Subject: FZ BIBLE 2/3 SHSBC-392 TRACK AND BANK ANATOMY

Date: 2 Jul 1998 22:43:14 -0000

From: Secret Squirrel <anon@squirrel.owl.de>

Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net

Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology



FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST (TAPE TRANSCRIPT)



SHSBC-392 14 JUL 64 TRACK AND BANK ANATOMY (confidential) 2/3



Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology

Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.



The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of

Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the

copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.



The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings

of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.



We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according

to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.



But the Christians are not good and obedient Jews and yet

are allowed to have their old testament regardless of any

Jewish opinion.



We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion

as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures

without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.



We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do

not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope

that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose

to aid us for that reason.



Thank You,



The FZ Bible Association



**************************************************



SHSBC-392 14 JUL 64 TRACK AND BANK ANATOMY (confidential) Part 2



This tape is omitted from the SHSBC cassettes.



Transcript of Taped Lecture by L. Ron Hubbard

ShSpec 29  -   6407 C 14

(Renumbered SHSBC - 392)

July 14, 1964



 TRACK AND BANK ANATOMY



(continued from part 1)



Truth must be truth. It must be all the way truth. Now,

anybody who is studying slowly, and so forth, gets caught

up in this factor: That you can't go part way to truth.

The most suicidal activity that you can engage upon, is to

go part way to the truth. You've got to go all the way to the

truth. There are no half truths. About the most dangerous

thing you can have anything to do with is a half truth.

There are.. people have understood this, that a little

knowledge is dangerous. Well, that's actually not very well

applied, that's not even very well stated, and it certainly

isn't the same sense of what I'm saying here. No truth can

be half way approached. If you got that far and didn't go

any further, you would fall flat on your face and be in

quite a mess. If you set out to shoot the moon, there is

nothing sillier than going into perihelion around it for

the rest of your life (chuckle). You've got to land on the

moon. There is no substitute for totality with regard to

truth. In other words, you've got to know all of it.



And this is ... this I'm trying to field a philosophy. The

Bugdeammerbum.. the famous witch doctor from lower

Scrambula, he puts his foot on this line and he says,

"There really is no time" and he doesn't go any further

than that. He teaches everybody, there really is no time.

He's put himself and everybody around him with one foot on

the banana peel and the other in the grave, see. He hasn't

told them why there is no time, see. He hasn't told them

anything, and all he'll do is ... everybody goes around

saying, well there is no time, so it doesn't matter, but

yet, echoing in around in their skull is the fact that it's

true, there is no time. That is a truth, but it is so

little of the truth. Without somebody going the whole way,

it actually becomes quite dangerous. The whole race would

then simply go in apathy and that would be the end of it.



And that is what has happened in almost all philosophies

that I have ever heard of. See, they get some corner of

some truth and then they don't walk down that road and they

go no further than this. You see? And they sit around on

mountain tops regarding their navels and they do weird odd

ball things, and they wonder why they're not getting any

better if they know so much. Well, the reason they're not

getting any better, even though they know so much, is

because they started on the road to truth and they never

made the passage and they're something like a ship-wrecked

ship. They're high and dry on that reef and they're never

gonna go any further. But having gone that distance, it

wrecked them. Now this in itself is soul chilling.



This pronounces something quite interesting to you. You

can say, well we started into Scientology. Yeah, you

started on a road toward truth, didn't you? The only fatal

thing you can do, if you know this about your pcs, and you

know it about those around you, and you know it about some

of them fallen by the wayside, you instinctively feel it.



Having started, ceasing to go is one of the most fatal

things they could do. Now you look at this with some

sadness because it's actually a very fatal action. But let

me call to your attention something else. It isn't that

Scientology got you started on the road to truth. You

started on the road long time before. You've been on that

road ... When you sat down in the amphitheater, when you sat

down in the amphitheater in Greece and listened to somebody

saying philosophically, yippity yappishly, that something

is the end of the road and Kronos actually devours his own

children and therefore the whole universe is circular and

whatever else is being said. You started on the road to

truth and you can speculate along this particular direction:

what is the truth in this matter? What is the true composition

of this universe? What is my true identity? Who am I?

What do I consist of? Where do I come from?  Of course,

nearly everybody has asked that question of himself since

he's a little child. You started on the road to truth.

That's dangerous, unless you walk the whole road.



That road's got to be walked because the character of the

GPMs themselves admit of no halfway measures. You key in

of one of these GPMs, and you key in a series of GPMs, you

get them all roiled up and then you don't do anything about

them, you're in the soup.  They contain the end all of all

explanations. Contained in the GPMs are the explanation of

the universe in which we live. Their identity, everything

everything is composed of. The impetus. All of these very

things.



In other words, the philosopher busy philosophizing and

having himself a ball on the subject and coming up to some

conclusion. Let's take Einstein. Einstein was walking on

this road. He had finally gotten up to a point where he

was trying to integrate life into his other equations and

he was groping, groping, groping and he left one of the

most remarkable, he left one of the most thoroughly

remarkable messes for ages forward to figure out that you

ever cared to have anything to do with. When he died he

had a bunch of consultations. In other words, he was going

towards the everything of everything. In other words, he

was going towards something that explains everything, and

he hadn't arrived any closer than a bunch of symbols.

Having figured out his various equivalents of constants,

and speeds of light, matter, energy, space, and time,

having figured these out, he was trying to squeeze life

into this somehow or other, and he left an awful hodge

podge of figures which everybody worships back where he

was, Princeton I think it was... And they're busy trying

to do something with this now and it's all very complex

and it's all very something or other. In fact, everybody

around there is half way spinning, what the devil were these

last equations that Einstein wrote. He was just trying to

integrate life with the universe. That's, everybody would

say, an over simplification. No, it isn't, that's a more

truthful statement. That's closer to the truth than they

are. He was just trying to integrate life and the universe

and that and that. That's all.



The old Encyclopedia Britannica says in order to understand

space and time, you had better understand the mind because

it's very often, very possible, that space and time are

simply generated by the mind, how do we know. Interesting.

That's in the 1890 edition of Encyclopedia Britannica.

Marvelous insight. Very well put. I noticed it hasn't

been followed by anybody else. You notice that science

today says the mind is so in error, it is so inaccurate, is

so this, that it is just nothing in mechanics at all, but

mass is all and the mind is nothing, see. The universe is

everything, and the material things in existence are this

and then he is just a spontaneous combustion from mud, and

this is all he is, and he's just a lousy bum, and you talk

to one of these boys and their whole orientation is in this

direction. He will say, "Oh a computer, oh well a computer

never makes a mistake.  This is the run, it puts out all

these marvelous things, look at these marvelous things.

Human mind, agh, human being agh .... (muttering). Yeah,

listen to these boys. I've tried once in a while, timidly

for me, to say, "Who feeds the data to this computer?",

"What feeds the data to this computer, and get an answer

out of it and who inspects that answer after it has been

printed but the mind, the being, the person, the

individual." Yagh-yagh-yagh, they can't get this point at

all, see. In other words they've got now, the cake is more

important than the baker, see. You've got an end-all cake

that's self-generated and sprang spontaneously from the

cook pot, but no baker. The cake is greater than the

baker. Don't you see?



So, in studying R-6, the first thing we have to recognize

with vividness, is that we're dealing with the baker, not

the cake. We're dealing with the thing that makes it, not

the thing that is made. We've got to recognize that, and

that'll explain a great many failures auditors have when

they begin to approach R-6 and it's auditing techniques.

They pay all their attention to the mass, the GPM, the

significance, and to hell with the pc. Well in actual

fact, if you don't pay attention to the pc and his reaction

by keeping in a good auditing comm cycle, by doing good ARC

break assessments when you got by-passed charge, by first

and foremost taking care of the pc, by making absolutely

certain the pc doesn't have any PTPs at the time he's being

audited, making sure of all these little points, keeping

that pc in good communication, handling that very nicely,

making sure that all the items read, the pc is satisfied

that they have read, that the pc is cheerful and happy

about this, then you've just got an end-all cake, and you

got no baker. And it's the baker you're trying to handle

and it's the baker you'll be left with after the cake has

been et. So, you take good care of the baker. So a few

pieces of cake get chipped up. Well that's not very

important as long as you take care of the baker.



An individual is an individual and now you find this

inherent in early Scientology teachings where it was taught

more instinctively than factually, you see. It was taught

more on a basis of general knowingness. I knew how these

things were. You'll find that the being, the individual,

had generated the universe and part of that universe is the

GPM, and the GPM in it's generation then restrained him and

compelled him to covertly go on making the rest of the

universe unbeknownst to himself, and compelled him by his

own generation to go on making it, the GPM, see. So you're

not quite sure when you first look at this thing which way

is which. Is the cart drawing the horse or the horse

drawing the cart, you know. When you first look at it you

will say, "Wow - science, modern science has said, well,

it's all cake, and there's no baker", see.



Well let's take it up a little bit further. The first

trouble you're going to have and that is, is the course ...

is, is, is the cart being drawn by the horse or is the

horse being drawn by the cart, or who is running what, and

as the pc begins to look at this he actually can accept

intellectually, he's making this thing that is smacking his

face in but he can't put any part of it into actual

subjective reality. So it's a point you don't force down

his throat. It will eventually begin to dawn on him. He

gets to be further and further on a gradient of cause over

the GPM in spite of the fact that cause itself is an

end-Word.



The point is here, he gets to be, actually, more and more

cause over this GPM. See, everytime you're falling across a

real significant significance or something that is

absolutely necessary to do anything about anything with

you're also colliding, madly, with GPMs. You understand?

You're colliding with the meaningness of a GPM in some way,

shape, or form, in any human action, and in any part of or

action about this universe. It really doesn't matter much

what corner you approach of livingness or life in view of

the fact that livingness and life is created by the

individual through the GPM.



He creates the GPM and it creates it, but he's long since

forgotten he created the GPM. "It looks to me like"...,

you see, he would say, "it looks to me like the cake, you

know, is creatin' the rest of the kitchen." (chuckle) Why,

he will then not be able to very intelligently grasp the

fact that every time he tries to address any corner of

existence, he starts to feel strange or peculiar. Well

naturally, any corner of existence is already capped with a

GPM because if it wasn't, it wouldn't be there.



So, all of a sudden a guy is just thinking a thought, see,

thinking a thought at random. Alright, that is either a

lock on a Root-Word or a lock on an End-Word, see. One or

the other. It's a lock on a Root-Word or a lock on an

End-Word. That's it. I don't care what thought you just

thought, if you thought any at all, So you mustn't get

into some weird, you mustn't get into some weird odd-ball

contest of trying not to think in some way, in such a way

as not to restimulate a GPM. That doesn't happen to be

possible.



There's no particular reason for you ... I already went

over this rolley-coaster here a few weeks ago, it was a

relatively short time ago, I had to decide what this was

all about and I had to get down and work it all out very

carefully, and I did, you see, and that's the conclusion I

came to: That he built a universe through the formation of

a GPM and he couldn't think any thought to amount to

anything. But didn't amount to anything, he couldn't think

any thought that could impinge on one, one way or the

other. I made an actual test. It wasn't intentional.

It's with causation. I was telling you about cause level

and I had this struggle about trying to form a

communication about cause level, and I said, "Well I

don't ... " I knew that cause and so on, was an End-Word

in a GPM. We'll get on to what End Words are, and so forth,

in just a moment.



Well, I knew that it was an End Word and therefore I tried

to get around it by saying causation. Erase the causation

of a pc. And I tried to get around it also by using

causativeness, to increase the causativeness of a being.

And by the time I'd carefully written the bulletin, which

you have, carefully scouting this on causation and

causativeness, I was sick as a pup. It wasn't that I was

restraining anything, or anything, I was simply mis-wording

an End-Word. So I went back, I went back and scrubbed all

that and simply put cause down there well knowing that it

was an End-Word.



You don't want to keep repeating an End-Word at somebody

when you're giving them auditing commands. You can get out

to an outer perimeter lock. And that's what you want to

keep repeating, like "done". Well, that's very nice - done,

done, that's good. "What have you done?". That's good.

Withhold - no, that's a Root-Word because every time you

say withhold you're going to key-in directly and

immediately some other portion. You're gonna key-in

somebody faster than you're easing him up. Don't you see?

So, it's best in an auditing command to use an indirect

action. But in the discussion of communication of

anything, if you try to escape the significance of an

End-Word or the significance of a Root-Word, if you try to

escape these things and not mention them, all you do is

suppress them and the final result is, is you're

practically around the bend. So, the best answer is, the

hell with it. Say 'em. Do them. Not with a repetitive

auditing command. Not in a constant hammer pound of an

auditing command.



But a careful review shows that you can't escape this

particular thing and it shows, that when you're trying to

be technical, that a departure from the exact statement is

liable to make you sicker than an approach to the exact

statement. Then that says where you sit and where you

think. Now the number of Root-Words and End-Words which

you hear battered about every day, laid end to end, would

be longer than the Queen Elizabeth's passage from New York

to London. Every cocktail party on there, all they do is

bat about large numbers of Root-Words and End-Words.



Now, the worse off a person is, in actual fact, the more he

will talk in Root-Words and End-Words. Sanity, if it is

anything at all, would be the gradient scale of

destimulated Root-Words and End-Words, and insanity, would

be the command value of the Root-Words and End-Words over

the individual. Not their restimulation, but their command

value - that would be insanity. If Root-Words and

End-Words have a disproportionate command value over the

individual, you can say he's insane. Now that's ... That's

interesting too because insane, of course, is an End-Word.

But you have to step outside the basic considerations.



But quite in addition to adding both the universe and

personalities and reactions and so forth, the individual is

still quite capable of independent thought. And the reason

you have Dianetics and Scientology is totally attributable

to the fact that I've been walking, to a very marked

degree, outside the perimeter of reactive thought while

considering these various things. Now that's very

interesting. We got some place, you see, and didn't get

detoured into it even though we were dealing with and very

often using it.



Now take the very step with which you work - ARC. Affinity

is an End-Word - Reality is an End-Word - Communication is

an End-Word. There are three End-Words in a row, all the

way down early on the track and, theoretically, it should

make everybody sick as pups because it's so early. You

know, you destimulate the charge of them. Now, you're

living right in the middle of the fourth lightning if you

live in this universe and you're actually further from it

in Scientology than you are if you were out digging a ditch

somewhere because, believe me, that foreman when he comes

down the line is going to speak nothing but Root-Words and

End-Words. He's going to be pretty batty on the subject.



This little jazz musician, "Is that something!" "Boy

that's nowhere!" All in expletives. But they're ... you

get the idea? There's a vast difference here. They're

dead on dramatizing. They're completely unwitting. It

would be quite another thing for you, a Scientologist, to

be dead on wittingly. I know when I'm using Root Words and

when I'm using End Words to a very, very marked degree. If

I hadn't been aware of one before, if I ponder one too

hard, I'll get warm. When I notice that I'm getting rather

warm, I say, "Well what do you know, I wonder if that's a

Root Word, I wonder if that's an End-Word?" "Alright, it's

a Root Word. What do you know, must be a Root-Word

because it wouldn't add up any other way."



I found out that the resistance to and the flinch from

these things is what does the damage, not the use. That's

a very subtle point for you to know in Class VI. Very

subtile, so get that point down very well. It's the flinch

from, you see. It's the suppression of; it causes you to

feel dizzy and woggy and sick at your stomach. And

invalidation of, is what causes pain. Invalidation, of

course too, is an End-Word, but that causes pain. If you

want to make somebody hurt like crazy just get him to get

down, and say that it isn't true that there is a goal of

something or other, something or other, which is a real

goal, you see; or say it isn't true there is such an End

Word, and he's getting real excited about it, and the next

confounded thing you know, he'll feel like he's being sawed

up by a butcher's powered beef saw. What happened? Well,

the liabilities then are the liabilities of contest with

and dramatization of.



Contest with, is your greatest liability as a student.

Even though you're afraid of something you're still in

contest with it. It is that, and you are you. Afraid to

do these things. Walking the chalk line about them. Being

careful in consideration of them and those sort of things.

Well that's, that's where the damage comes. Then you say,

"Oh brother that's nowhere, that's really nowhere", you

know. "That's no..... I wonder what the hell I'm thinking

nowhere for, you know, what's all this nowhere. Tah, must

be an End Word. Ah, it's nowhere". You know, get the, get

the delicate shift here, see.



Alright, so you're gonna keep saying nowhere and make

yourself sick at the stomach and so forth and restimulate

the End-word "nowhere". Alright, that isn't going to worry

you until you suddenly realize you are saying "nowhere" and

to that degree dramatizing the thing, and then say you

mustn't because it is an End-Word. Now, you get that

subtle one? Because that's where you go over Niagara Falls

in a barrel. It's right at that point, see. You say,

"Well, I shouldn't be saying that because ...". Don't you

see?



Now, I've taken a new look at all this. So, you find out

after a conversation with somebody or other that you're

absolutely reeling. You've been talking about these things

and the room goes out of plumb, and so forth. So it does.

So what? Now, you really want to make it go out of plumb?

"Well I mustn't really discuss this anymore". Well, you've

knocked it all out of plumb with your locks. You see that?



Now, you find yourself dramatizing these things every once

in a while but it's only a sin not to eventually catch

yourself. I don't expect you not to dramatize them.

They're only still here, so you're dramatizing something

about space and matter, that's for sure, and time is

passing, so you must be dramatizing collectively, something

about time.



Alright! Well, let's figure this little other tiny nuance.

You all of a sudden find that you're sitting there saying,

"Tsk, problems, problems, problems, problems, now wait a

minute, I must have an End Word or something in

restimulation", see. Even though it's next week before you

find that out, see, and then not make the mistake of

saying, "Well, I mustn't say problems any more to myself",

see. Because the recognition of it is enough. You don't

have to prevent the future, because that's an End-Word too.

(laugh) So the gist of the situation is that you're

surrounded with these things and all you've done to date,

until you collide with them in study, is simply dramatize

them.



Now what's happening to you is you're finding out what

you've been dramatizing. Your face, every once in a while,

will be rather red on this subject. I, myself, pushed

myself away from an auditing session. Just very mildly

pushed myself from an auditing session and walked around

the room for a little while once, and I came back and I sat

down and I went over ... there wasn't anything wrong. I

was getting reads, everything was just fine. And I went

over everything under the sun, moon, and stars that I could

go over, and tried to compare everything that I had done

and everything I hadn't done and I was looking for this and

that and all of a sudden it occurred to me, I wonder what

I'm trying to do here. Why am I reviewing everything that

has happened here, you see. And then it suddenly struck me

that the next goal up that I was about to run was "To create

problems". I had simply been sitting there fearing

problems. I laughed at myself and ran the next pair. That

was the next one coming up. And I was - I was creating

problems - LIKE MAD. (laughing) You know what I mean?

You can't actually expect not to do it. If you didn't do

it, you wouldn't be part of the universe. Don't you see?



Your advance, is to some degree measured by your

recognition of what you, yourself, are doing. And a real

recognition comes about when you realize that you're making

these things up and of course about that time they will

cease to. Now there's a trap in all this of the tremendous

quantitativeness of them. There appear to be so many that

you become exhausted. The figures on this are variable.

There's a slight variation in these figures but the best

figures I have is 268 Roots and 268 End-Words. That makes

it square. There are 18 RIs in a GPM - proper line plot -

268 Root-Words in one series and 268 End-Words, or 268

serieses. Now if you multiply this one times the other,

you'll find then, there are in excess of 23,000 GPMs.



Now that, of course, is so staggering, there's such an

astonishing number that it makes you feel rather quivery on

a subject of, "I've got to audit all these out and it's

taking us a session, or in some cases it's taking us two

sessions to run out a GPM, and we're doing turn about type

auditing and I actually am only getting three sessions a

week and I'm running one and one half GPMs a week and there

are 23,000 of them to run out. So I can expect to be OT,

of course, at the end of, something on the order of 33,000

weeks, or something like this. And 33,000 weeks divided by

52 gives you the nu.... Oh my God!"



Well, of course, it's not the way it goes. This would be

good pedantic mathematics but it doesn't happen to be an

accurate situation. Once you've got your plot well oiled

in, you're spending less and less time in trying to find

your way down the bank. Don't you see? Once you've got

.. ninety percent of this work, by the way .. well I'm not

quite ... yes, I'd say ninety percent of the work has been

done on the organization of this. The consecutive adjacent

Goals and the consecutive adjacent End-Words are, are still

in a state of polish. They're mostly known, don't you see,

but they could be wiggled or wobbled to be here or be

there, or be something of the sort, don't you see, but the

trick was to get the pattern. Of course, the biggest trick

was to find out it was there at all. But to get the

pattern of this thing took me over a year and a half of

some of the wildest most troublesome stuff I have ever been

through. Very gruesome.



I look now on an auditor who can't find a few synonyms.

He's got one, he's got one to spit, you know. He can't

find the next goal which is to expectorate. I rather look

at this as being rather poor because the next goal to spit

is to, of course, - this is not a proper Root-Word - the

next goal to spit would of course be to expectorate, see.

It's to spit cats, the next goal is to expectorate cats,

you see, and the next goal to it would be to spitee cats.

Very imaginative. You've got "to run" is next to "to gallop",

you see. To travel fast, to speed. They're just all tied

together, the same word. Same word, and it's got to be

checked out and the best thing to do this with is one of

these New Rodell Word Finders. They're only available in

the United States and they're very, very fancy. They've

had a lot of college professors working on the thing and

they were nicely keyed-in and they practically laid the

bank out in this thing unwittingly and unknowingly and you

look up a list of synonyms, brother it will find the next

door cousin in most of the cases.



(continued in part 3)



