FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST



EXPANDED DIANETICS (XDN) TAPE 3 of 4



**************************************************



The XDN Tapes:



XDN-1 30 Mar 72 Expanded Dianetics

XDN-2 7 Apr 72 Expanded Dianetics and Word Clearing

XDN-3 7 Apr 72 Auditor Administration

XDN-4 7 Apr 72 Illness Breakthrough





**************************************************



STATEMENT OF PURPOSE 



Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology

Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.



The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of

Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists. It misuses the

copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.



They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be

stamped out as heritics. By their standards, all Christians, 

Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered

to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.



The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings

of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.



We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according

to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.



But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,

the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old 

testament regardless of any Jewish opinion. 



We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion

as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures

without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.



We ask for others to help in our fight. Even if you do

not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope

that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose

to aid us for that reason.



Thank You,



The FZ Bible Association





********** TAPE XDN 3 *************



[We don't know the source that was originally scanned,

but we checked these against an original set of reels from

the 1970s and found various omissions which are marked

with ">"]





EXPANDED DIANETICS LECTURE No. 3



To the Flag Dianetic Auditing Team on 7 April 1972



7204C07 SOII XDN-3





AUDITOR ADMINISTRATION





All right. Now, actually your auditing has been very good.

It's been very, very good. And the only thing I'm picking

you up on is just on a, I haven't picked you up as hard as

I could on it, is just the common old garden variety form

of the administrative actions. So I'll go over those.



The form of a folder: it is a folder and it does have the

consecutive sessions and examiner reports and C/Ses, page

by page, from way back at the bottom up to the top of it.

The folder mustn't get too fat. The program is on the

left-hand inside cover. The pc's name is on the edge of the

back; the pc's name is on the top face of the folder. It's

on the edge so that you can pull it out of a stack when

they're lying in packs. Now you know all that sort of

thing. But there's a little bit more to know about it, and

that is, you always check off the step on the program that

you have done. That doesn't seem like much, but actually

that gives, it gives another terminal in the Org the

information he looks for. He wants to know how far the

program is done so he knows when this guy will be finished,

that's the Host. He wants to know when this person will be

finished and he can estimate in some very, very odd fashion

if he looks at the date of the last session, or the last

C/S, which is uppermost, and then looks over on the red

program sheet (the ink written program sheet), and he looks

and sees that's checked off and there's just two more steps

to do. Now, he does have enough sense to know about how

long it takes to do what's left. But he is not a technical

terminal, so therefore, the Folder Summary would be

meaningless to him. It's usually abbreviated and it's this

and that. But all he wants to know is how far does that

program got to go. Now, that's all, actually, a D of P

wants to know. He isn't paying any attention to the folder

summary either. But he is paying attention to that program

sheet.



Now, that program sheet was laid out by the C/S as a

hopeful action. Now, you've just been doing a lot of these,

but it's the hopeful action that these steps will bring

this case back to battery. "Back to battery" artillery

term. A gun after it fires is said to go "out of battery" which

is to say it recoils. And then after it fires is supposed

to go back to battery which is sitting the way you see them

in photographs. And they use the term in slang to indicate

somebody who is now fixed up. All right! So this guy will be all right

for something or what he has had will now be over.



Most of the time when you read these things, the C/S, I

could give you a purer definition and say it is a completed

case for that level. But the C/S normally doesn't think

like that he's looking through there and he sees all of

these mistakes in the FES and he sees all of this and that,

and something or other has happened with the case, and this

or that is wrong with the case and he really doesn't even

think, most of the time, of what he's trying to make right

with the case. But he knows these things have to be

handled. So therefore he writes this program down and the

end of that program should be, well, this guy is safe to go

off on a mission, he's all right to go home, he will do all

right on his post. That's the way they normally think of

this, and so on. And your point of view; it would be a well

person, something of that sort, for such a program.



Now, technically speaking, when you are doing something to

bring a case back up to where the case ought to he on his

Grade Chart, that is to say, the big Grade Chart, that is a

Progress Program. You're not putting him through another

grade. Now, we've got a little split in Specialist

Dianetics because, actually, we're writing these things up

on a Red Sheet when they're really Expanded Dianetics and

are a grade really in themselves. So, we've written all

those on Red Sheets, but actually they ought to be two

sheets. They ought to be the actions necessary to get 

them up to Expanded Dianetics would be the

repair, and then when you start running Expanded Dianetics

it should be on a Green Sheet because in actual fact is a

grade.



Now, it wouldn't much matter where this fellow was, he is

still getting a grade. It doesn't matter whether this grade

fits on his grade chart now, it's going to fit clear up

there after OT III. It doesn't matter if it fits before

he's going to have any Dianetics at all. It doesn't

matter if it fits after Dianetics, it's an entirely

separate grade. And what it's going to-do is fix him up, as

a Grade, to make a well person out of him. Now, you will

find then, that these sheets will start, and they look like

a repair of Dianetics, but it isn't really a repair of

Dianetics, he just couldn't run it. So, they didn't run

Dianetics He didn't like engrams or something. He didn't

understand the words. So, therefore, you're really doing a

specialist action which would permit him to run Dianetics.

But, in doing that, you're going to cure him.



Now, you see, Dianetics isn't just a health action. It can

do two more things. One of those products is a person who

will continue to be well for a long time. And the other one

is, it will increase his abilities. Now, when you bridge

over to the point where he's well you're really just doing

Dianetics. So what you're really working is for a well

person. Not a person who will continue to he physically

well for a long time. Because that would be Dianetics.



So, you'll find out that interns, others, will say, "Well,

this Expanded Dianetics that we're running actually is just

like Dianetics and we've got to clear the lists anyhow, and

so on . Well, the trouble with that is, the length of time

it would take to make a Dianetic Auditor who was capable of

doing Expanded Dianetics would interrupt the whole show

right there. Because there are a lot of people that can run

Dianetics. It's quite successful in lots of peoples' hands

on lots of pcs. So, now we're going to teach him all of

Dianetics and with no experience with running Dianetics

whatsoever, we're going to launch him off into very, being

very fancy at handling Dianetics. Oh yeah! Oh, we won't

make it. So, this influences your programming.



So, you really have two green sheets. You've got your

repair to get him up there. Now, where you have drawn a

line here and there, and have marked in (printed in)

Expanded Dianetics, if you want to he very stylized about

it all. That is over, that repair is over, that is it.

That's the red sheet, finished. We're going to give him,

let us say, a Primary Rundown and we're going to, and so

on, we're going to send him to the doctor to get his

epiglottis cured. That's a fictitious term. And so, you've

probably noticed it, that your people are sort of out of phase.



You don't know quite where you're starting on them and

where you're not starting on them and so forth, because

there are some beginning steps every now and then. They're

supposed to get Word Clearing Number One and that sort of

thing. They're supposed to get this, that or the other

thing and then they're going to have, so on. Well, now, if

they bog down on Word Clearing you're going to have to

handle that and finish up their Word Clearing Number One.



Right? That's a repair



You shouldn't start out and pick up somebody and do a Word

Clearing Number One and say that you're starting Expanded

Dianetics. There's nothing wrong with his Word Clearing,

you're just going to clear, give him Word Clearing Number

One and then you're going to start Expanded Dianetics. It's

actually the waste of a specialist.



So, all of these prior actions that you have to take to get

the person up there might or might not be by the Dianetic

Specialist but certainly Expanded Dianetics will be by the

Dianetic Specialist.



And it would be up to judgment on who'd repair it. Well, a

frequent change of auditors upsets people like mad. So if

these are not very extensive, well, I'd go ahead and do a

Word Clearing Correction List or something like that. But

particularly if it's a Word Clearing Correction List or

something like that, yeah, well, you'd want to do that

yourself. But you're going to start this fellow out and

you're going to give him Word Clearing Number One and then

you're going to take all the things that he has ever read

up to date, and you're going to clear those with Word

Clearing Number Two. And then you're going to get him

entirely through the Primary Correction Rundown of Study

Tapes and finding his "why" and you're going to do all

this, huh? No Wrong hat.



Now, if you start adding those things in, and if you don't

have a good idea of exactly where you belong on the Grade

Chart or your action, then you're going to go adrift.

Because all of a sudden, you'll start inheriting all the

bits and pieces and odds and ends that nobody can figure

out where to go. Now you just inherited one. Girl came in

here, auditing her, I just had her folder. You did a Word

Clearing Correction List on her, something like that and

WHAM, she was incomplete, middle of the rundown, read like

mad. On Advanced Courses! She had no more business under

gods green earth being any place but over on Advanced Courses

because if you ran anything else on her until she finished

that up she would still he getting audited in the middle of

another rundown. You can't perpetuate the error, that is

continue the error forever.



She didn't belong to you at all. They goofed. And what do

you know, just got through goofing again. The auditor

looked over the list after the session, found out she still

had a reading item on the list she'd forgotten to handle,

so decided she would get her back into session next time,

handle that.



The time the person got ill, she was rather chronically ill

for a long period of time, but the time the person really

got ill, currently, is she was declared complete on an AO

rundown, promptly got ill. The A0, the Advanced Courses

Unit lost the pc off the lines, that is all. It didn't call

the pc back in, didn't review the pc, didn't at that time,

which is why that was reorganized at that time early

February. Had no slightest idea of who was on the lines,

just let them, just lost them all over the place. So a guy

would go out and give himself a solo session, fall on his

head, red tabbed, never be called back into the Advanced

Courses, didn't have a review auditor . So it was an untidy

scene, to say the least.



And here, all of a sudden, you've got this folder. Now you

want to know what to do with this.



So, routing, you see, is important to you. What do you do

with this guy? All right, you're perfectly willing to go on

and do it. I marked it, because I didn't know whether

Advanced Courses would repair the person or not. I marked

it that you could do it if you wanted to, if they didn't.

No reason to just stall the pc and again lose the pc off

the lines.



But it 's just been done and what happened was, is repair

actions continuously were taking place on this pc in the

middle of an AO rundown since 1968 and it's now '72. And

then the person finally said, in some off hand way that she

thought she was finished. They put another C/S in that

folder and - it might have been there in the review folder

where it shouldn't have been -but, I don't think there was

any declare? They even lost the folder. And she promptly

afterwards got sick and the AO didn't route any exam report

into the folder and they never kept track in Advanced

Course line of their pre-OT's, what business have you got

to do with that? None, none whatsoever.



Now, if at some time, when that action, which is a red, red

sheet action, don't you see, but Advanced Courses, when

they finish that up and the person is still falling on

their head and that sort of thing, and etcetera. But when

that level is completed why that is the time to come over.



Actually, the Review Auditor at this particular time

doesn't want to be there. You normally find people who were

doing a bad job aren't quite on the post. They either have'nt

gotten onto the post, not that they aren't hatted, they

just don't, haven't gotten onto the post yet, or they're

leaving the post, or they want to leave the post, or they

are somebody else while holding that title, or they have a

wrong product which is changing their post hat but they

don't ever notice it, which can be very interesting.



You know, that the D of P can have completed programs as

his product and he's of course the C/S. I want you to take

a look at that. Now, let's exaggerate it. Let's exaggerate

it, so you can really see it. Supposing the Folder Page had

"well pcs", as a product. Now, the Folder Page of course is

not even in connection with the pcs or the auditors but is

only with the C/S. It was interesting, I had a couple of my

Messengers the other day trying to work out their product,

on folder paging. We found out that it didn't really

describe it. I think they came up with finally, the action

was "feeding folders to the Senior C/S and routing them to

tech", which gave, of course, the product would he "a

folder fed to the Senior C/S and routed to Tech." And that

was what these messengers were doing up there. By ''fed" we

mean put on the deck, opened, so that it could be handled

and taken off the deck and routed and so on. Soon as we

cleared that they went, whizz-whizz-whizz-whizz-whizz-whizz-

whizz-whizz, a whole great big stack of folders went down

bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzmmm. Up to that time, I would have them, I

was having to yell for them for each folder, they didn't

have a product.



So a product can be very, very, very important. It can be

so important that the slowness that you are trying to get

handled can simply be something is wrong about the product.

They either don't have one at all, they haven't named the

product, they're really, mentally, working for the wrong

product, never having straightened it out. Am I making my

point now? So that if you, as a Dianetic Specialist, are

working for an AO product - ahhh, the bell begins to toll,

huh? So, the second that you find yourself off product by

reason of programs you know you're handling something that

doesn't belong to you.



Now, I'll tell you something very funny. The pending

basket, the center pending basket of the three tiers of

baskets top is the ''IN", center is "PENDlNG", bottom

"OUT", all right. Very good Or, they were reversed if I

remember rightly. The stuff in that center basket, if you

go into an executive's office, will be found not to belong

to him, and that's why it's in pending.

And you can go into that middle pending basket and just

take all the stuff out and sit down with the executive, if

you're a communicator, and you can just take them one by

one and say, "who does this belong to?" And all of a

sudden, the bulk of all that stuff he's been holding onto,

one belongs to Address, somebody else belongs to something

else, somebody belongs to something else and so on. They're

all parts of the, see. Not the wrong parts of the, they're

all in the parts of the org that he isn't having anything to do

with.



So, this tells you, just on that example that you could

accumulate a tremendous number of pcs that nothing would

happen with if you continued to work on the wrong product

and that they belong to somebody else for some reason. And

when you get backlogs, let me give you this very sound

advice, look over and see that those pcs belong to you. Now

that is why you have the programs very, very well sharply

done, particularly as the Dianetics Specialist. That top

one is red, you don't have to change all of your stuff,

making you redo your programs, you're going on down through

the line fine, you did very good programs. That top one,

that top red one, that's to get him up to a place where you

can work on him. Now it might be that the repairs are so

slight or something like that, like Word Clearing, so on.

Well, fine, correction list. Got to correct his Word

Clearing, nobody else is going to. But you should realize

at that moment that you're really working on another

product, see. It's almost worth a chit. "FMAA, person word

cleared, such and such a time, place, according to the

folder, such and such an auditor, found out."



Now we sent one out the other day, we sent one to the AOLA

Rap-rap-rap, couple of nice, juicy conditions. They sent a

guy in here, after his Word Clearing he had a horrible

headache so they ran a couple of Class VI processes that

have very little to do with headaches. And it didn't occur

to a single soul that he had just had Word Clearing and he

should have a Word Clearing Correction List run on him.

He's running like a hot bomb now because we ran a Word

Clearing Correction List on him. But we also sent a chit

and that isn't being mean, that's just trying to keep the

lines policed. If you don't ever make any effort to keep

the lines policed they'll cave in on you. It isn't even of

great concern to you that this gets handled by the MAA or

something. You just write it down, who it was, and where,

and what you got, and you can go ahead and handle it. But

that makes you aware of the fact that you're handling

somebody else's product of one kind or another and keeps

you from scrambling up your products. And that's the only

thing I'm trying to ask you not to do.



Now, if you're going to make this person well and you're

going to use Expanded Dianetics on, well, you have to do a

little bit of repair to get him up to that point. But your

Expanded Dianetics is an action and it is a grade in its

own right. Really, the AMA would jump me for saying it, and

I think California has laws that nobody can cure cancer.

And they've just disobeyed that law in England because a

doctor up there, who is a Dianetic Auditor, has just cured

somebody of totally proven cancer. Has taken him over to

the medical association and a big conference and so on, and

displayed him complete with the X-rays and so forth. So,

gee it's a good thing he didn't do that in California.



We had all auditor, in 1950s, who was actually arrested for

the fact of ... proven conclusively, because he'd audited

somebody and they had gotten well and it was against the

law to cure that disease. He got off, there wasn't anything

happened to him at all, somebody was just making a push on

it locally. Pretty crazy, huh? Proved it conclusively.

Against the law to heal it and he'd done it. Man. Man

unaimed sometimes is idiocy.



Anyway, I'm not warning you not to cure things but saying

that this product of "a cured person" can't be stated that

way, it has to be stated as "a well person," ...illegal. I've

worked it out one time, I think it's because the

undertaker's percentage to the AMA, and so forth, would

lose and drop as a stat if you - That's the only reason I

could find for it. I'm sure they get ten or twenty percent

of all the funeral fees. Anyhow, it must be.



But in this field, in this field, that's the product,

that's your product, it's a well person. All right, fine,

but if the other actions have to be taken, like sending him

to a medical doctor or getting their head sewn up or

something like this why that is quite another action. That

is quite another action than what you're supposed to be

doing. Well, you can send him to the medical doctor, 

that's beside the point. But it's not the product you are 

working for. They won't get well anyhow but, it's not 

what you're working for. But there has to he a certain 

number of actions that bring you up to where you are 

going to do this Expanded Dianetics, and then that should 

be on a Green Sheet. And then if you're going to do Dianetics, 

why that ought to be included. Sooner or later this

guy is going to be well, see. Well, you're not going to

audit him forever. That's it. Turn him over to the HSDC.

You get the point? So, that has a lot to do with what it is.



All right. Now, always mark in a folder summary, mark in

your session, and your admin time, and approximately

whether it ran and what, approximately what was run, and

what happened with the Exam report. Now, you know all those

things, but do you know they get omitted? And all you got

to do is omit one of those things and you've had it. Now,

there's something else, it sounds so petty and so little

and so tiny. Number your pages back and front The first

page of the Work Sheet is number one, and the second page

of the work sheet is number two, and the third page of the

work sheet is the next sheet. Now why all that? Well,

you've possibly haven't been working with a meticulous,

meaning a very precise, C/S and it makes a difference. You

want to be able to say, "it's page twenty-six" or "page

twenty-five" "Now the R/S which occurred on page

twenty-five,'' in writing this, your C/S, up. And it just

saves more time than you ever cared to look at. And

furthermore, it gives you the proper number of pages that

the session went It doesn't matter whether you write big or

small. Now, if you write big, that's fine, but write

legibly. I mean readable.



So a work sheet is fixed up at the end of the session. Go

through it and glance through it and see whether or not

there are any words that nobody could make out. And if they

are, put it in BLOCK PRINT. Now you can overdo this to an

extent, that it's almost sarcasm. At the most it'd just run

one or two corrections to a page or something like that.

But if you're having to correct a pages like that, then the

auditor should learn how to write rapidly, legibly, and

people can do that.



A newspaper reporter, by the way, of 1898, could write

faster than a man could talk, longhand, beautifully. And I

have seen notes taken by the Columbian College Association,

George Washington University. I wrote their Historical

Supplement. I didn't go there by the way, you know, I

merely was a - that's what they tell people - that's very

funny. Before they lie like that they ought to go in and

look at some of their things I used to, I used to write

their supplements, like their magazine supplements, and

that sort of thing. I always was on the front page. And you

go in and find out who was the President of the American

Society of Civil Engineers and that sort of thing, in such

and such a year, and I got my name up in gold on the wall.

They're not clever, and so on.



But actually, that is an organization that was dominated by

a fellow named Oberholzer. They were dominated there

through their psychology department. And he's World

Federation of Mental Health, (SMERSH) I shouldn't speak

harshly of the World Federation of Mental Health

at this particular time because you never speak of those

that are dying. But that's where all that came from. Hasn't

anything to do with anything else. I expect in another 50

years they'll probably have a gold plaque out in front of

the building, you know. So I tell everybody I didn't go

there, that fixes them.



Well, now, when you find an Ethics situation in a folder

you mark it. You don't necessarily turn it in because you

can't try a guy on his work sheets in his auditing, it's

illegal. But you, for heaven's sakes, at least make mention

of it on your Auditor's C/S. And if he R/Ses you make

mention of it. "R/S on page 21" And when you're doing that

and you're doing, your administration, you pick up that

R/S, circle it with a red pencil.



Now if an Evil Purpose suddenly leaps into view with a

crash and a bang or a very very juicy item leaps up with a

crash and a bang, it's a little bit dramatic to pick up a

red pencil in the session and circle it, but you can put a

bar along side of it to be circled. Now when an Evil

Purpose jumps up you mark it over on the side of the

program. And when this person is suddenly found to be

R/Sing you mark it over on the edge, the left-hand edge of

the program, the topmost program, "R/Ses " That's all you

have to say. But on your work sheet and so on, why, you

should say what page it's on. Now if you wanted to be very

fancy on the thing, you would say date and work sheet page

on the program. And you should do that for an Evil Purpose

because somebody up the line is going to want to date and

locate that thing and he doesn't want to go through

seventeen feet of folders just to find one lousy evil

purpose. You got it?



So, the upshot of this is that it's information. Now, that

for sure is marked on your Folder Summary, and it's usually

marked in red, and the evil purpose is similarly marked.

Your Dianetic items are for sure marked, "ran so and so and

so and so "Well, you know that and you're doing that, but

that evil purpose there, mark that in red with a bit of a

circle on it also, back there on the Folder Summary because

somebody else up the line is going to mark "I hate

everybody" or whatever the evil purpose is, that isn't one.

He's going to mark that, that it was dated and located, so

you can check a Folder Summary and find out whether things

were handled.



A lot of things wrong with an FES is that they've already

been handled. And it's very very difficult to track whether

or not they've been handled. So, the mark down of handling

and so forth is correct.



Now, when you correct a list, a list is brought forward and

corrected and so on, why, it should be marked as corrected.

Otherwise, somebody will be correcting it again, somebody's

TA will go up and they'll wonder what in the hell is going

on. Now, we're just talking about common little old garden

variety admin that makes the lines flow smoothly. They are

otherwise; the auditor writes out his C/S and the C/S gives

the session grade and all that. You know these things,

these are fine. But I'm just giving you just these little

tiny fine points that make it a lot easier to run. Now,

when you get those things in you'll find it is.



Now, I notice you're putting a slip on the outside of your

folder, totally unnecessary. But you could put some

Christmas tape on it. That marks the folder as being on

Expanded Dianetics. I don't care what color tape you use.

Usually they're marked, when you're marking a folder, mark

it around the back, that is, from the cover around the back

of the bind, so it can be picked out of a folder stack Now,

they use green as advanced courses, but we've, more of

less, ceased to use red, so you might as well use red. And

that is enough.



Now, they know those folders are coming up and there's no

reason to mark a routing slip on them. It is that stack and

you should have a place to put that stack of folders "GO

TO" or you bring them up. And then there is, should be an

arrangement of that stack of folders, goes back and appears

in this place and then you won't be into a horrible

scramble. The folder, completely aside from the pc has its

own routing lines. And people sometimes don't recognize

that they're routing a folder, they're routing an auditor,

they're routing a pc. And that's why they have a scramble

and confusion, because they've just got one of the items,

like the auditor.



They don't get the auditor something. It's one of these

things that's left out and you get an omitted datum

continuously and that messes up the scene.



All right. Now, all of that's well and good. How many

misunderstood words have you picked up now? Have you picked

up any or anything, speak up if you have? All right, thank

you very much.



END OF TAPE

============

